Formal and informal CALL preparation and teacher attitude toward technology

Computer Assisted Language Learning

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 173-188

  Kessler, Greg ^a  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249656886     PISSN: 09588221     EISSN: 17443210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09588220701331394     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Atkins, N., & Vasu, E. (2000). Measuring knowledge of technology usage and stages of concern about computing: A study of middle school teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 279-302.
2. Bax, S. (2003). CALL - Past, present and future. System, 31, 13-28.
3. Becker, H. J., & Riel, M. M. (2000). Teacher professional engagement and constructivist-compatible computer use. Retrieved from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/report_7/
4. Chapelle, C. (2005). Interactionist SLA Theory in CALL research. In J. L. Egbert & G. M. Petrie (Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 53-64). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Egbert, J., Paulus, T. M., & Nakamichi, Y. (2002). The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language, Learning & Technology, 6(3), 108-126.
6. Halttunen, L. G. (2002). Palomar College: A technological transformation. Community College Journal, 75(2), 26-31.
7. Harrington, H. (1991). Using technology in teacher education: Facilitating development or maintaining the status quo? In D. Carey, R. Carey, D. Willis, & J. Willis (Eds.), Technology and teacher education annual (pp. 338-343). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
8. Kadel, R. (2005). How teacher attitudes affect technology integration. Learning and Leading with Technology, 32(5), 34-35.
9. Kern, R. (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 183-210.
10. Kessler, G. (2006). Assessing CALL teacher training: What are we doing and what could we do better? In P. Hubbard, & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
11. Kinzie, M. B., & Delcourt, M. B. (1993). Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27(1), 35-41.
12. Milbrath, Y., & Kinzie, M. (2000). Computer technology training for prospective teachers: Computer attitudes and perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 5(4), 373-396.
13. Moore, K., Hopkins, S., & Tullis, R. (1993). NCATE accreditation: Visions of excellence. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27(1), 28-35.
14. Northrup, P., & Little, W. (1996). Establishing instructional technology benchmarks for teacher preparation programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 213-222.
15. Race, K. (2001, June). Development of an attitude survey to gauge teacher attitudes toward instructional strategies and classroom pedagogy in support of a larger outcomes-based evaluation effort. Paper presented at the 2001 American Evaluation Association National Meeting, St. Louis, MO.
16. Robb, T. (2006). CALL training expectations and the reality of skills attainment among CALL practitioners. In P. Hubbard, & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
17. Vodanovich, S. J., & Piotrowski, C. (2004-2005). Faculty attitudes toward web-based instruction may not be enough: Limited use and obstacles to implementation. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 33, 309-318.