Methods for quantitative image quality evaluation of MRI parallel reconstructions: detection and perceptual difference model

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 712-721

  Jiang, Yuhao ^a,b   Huo, Donglai ^b   Wilson, David L ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b Case Western Reserve University   (United States)

^c CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Channelized Hotelling observer; Detection; Parallel reconstruction; Perceptual difference model

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CATTLE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY);

BOVINAE;

EID: 34249325873     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.10.019     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. van Vaals J.J., Brummer M.E., Dixon W.T., Tuithof H.H., Engels H., Nelson R.C., et al. "Keyhole" method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging 3 (1993) 671-675
2. Shankaranarayanan A., Wendt M., Aschoff A.J., Lewin J.S., and Duerk J.L. Radial keyhole sequences for low field projection reconstruction interventional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 13 (2001) 142-151
3. Meyer C.H., Hu B.S., Nishimura D.G., and Macovski A. Fast spiral coronary artery imaging. Magn Reson Med 28 (1992) 202-213
4. Blaimer M., Breuer F., Mueller M., Heidemann R.M., Griswold M.A., and Jakob P.M. SMASH, SENSE, PILS, GRAPPA. How to choose the optimal method. Top Magn Reson Imaging 15 (2004) 223-236
5. Burgess A.E. The Rose model, revisited. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 16 (1999) 633-646
6. Spraggins T.A. Simulation of spatial and contrast distortions in keyhole imaging. Magn Reson Med 31 (1994) 320-322
7. Duerk J.L., Lewin J.S., and Wu D.H. Application of keyhole imaging to interventional MRI: a simulation study to predict sequence requirements. J Magn Reson Imaging 6 (1996) 918-924
8. Lewin J.S., Connell C.F., Duerk J.L., Chung Y.C., Clampitt M.E., Spisak J., et al. Interactive MRI-guided radiofrequency interstitial ablation of abdominal tumors: clinical trial for evaluation of safety and feasibility. J Magn Reson Imaging 8 (1998) 40-47
9. Moriguchi H., Wendt M., and Duerk J.L. Applying the uniform resampling (URS) algorithm to a Lissajous trajectory: fast image reconstruction with optimal gridding. Magn Reson Med 44 (2000) 766-781
10. Duerk J.L., Wu D.H., Chung Y.C., Liang Z.P., and Lewin J.S. A simulation study to assess SVD encoding for interventional MRI: effect of object rotation and needle insertion. J Magn Reson Imaging 6 (1996) 957-960
11. Salem K.A., Lewin J.S., Aschoff A.J., Duerk J.L., and Wilson D.L. Validation of a human vision model for image quality evaluation of fast interventional magnetic resonance imaging. J Electron Imaging 11 (2002) 224-235
12. Huo D., Xu D., Liang Z.P., and Wilson D.L. Application of perceptual difference model on regularization techniques of parallel MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 24 (2006) 123-132
13. Burgess A.E. Visual signal detection with two-component noise: low-pass spectrum effects. J Opt Soc Am A 16 (1999) 694-704
14. Xue P., Thomas C.W., Gilmore G.C., and Wilson D.L. An adaptive reference/test paradigm with applications to pulsed fluoroscopy perception. Behav Res Meth Instrum Comput 30 (1998) 332-348
15. Myers K.J., and Barrett H.H. Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. J Opt Soc Am A 4 (1987) 2447-2457
16. Abbey C.K., and Bennett R. Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. J Opt Soc Am A 18 (2001) 473-488
17. Jiang Y., and Wilson D.L. Optimization of detector pixel size for stent visualization in X-ray fluoroscopy. Med Phys 33 (2006) 668-678
18. Srinivas Y., and Wilson D.L. Quantitative image quality evaluation of pixel binning in a flat panel detector for X-ray fluoroscopy. Med Phys 31 (2004) 131-141
19. Ying L., Xu D., and Liang Z.P. On Tikhonov regularization for image reconstruction in parallel MRI. Proc IEEE EMBS (2004) 1056-1059
20. Pruessmann K.P., Weiger M., Scheidegger M.B., and Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42 (1999) 952-962
21. Lin F.H., Kwong K.K., Belliveau J.W., and Wald L.L. Parallel imaging reconstruction using automatic regularization. Magn Reson Med 51 (2004) 559-567
22. King K.F., and Angelos L. SENSE image quality improvement using matrix regularization. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Meeting of ISMRM (2001)
23. Liang Z.P., Stenger A., Ji J.X., Ma J., and Boada F. Parallel generalized series imaging. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of ISMRM (2003)
24. Pruessmann K.P., Weiger M., Bornert P., and Boesiger P. Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k-space trajectories. Magn Reson Med 46 (2001) 638-651
25. Sekuler R., and Blake R. Perception (2001), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
26. Kelly D.H. Retinal inhomogeneity: I. Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity. J Opt Soc Am A 1 (1984) 107-113
27. Eckstein M.P., Abbey C.K., and Whiting J.S. Human vs. model observers in anatomic backgrounds. Proceedings of the SPIE Medical Imaging: Image Perception (1998), SPIE, Bellingham (Wash) 15-26
28. Mannos J.L., and Sakrison D.J. The effects of a visual fidelity criterion on the encoding of images. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 20 (1974) 525-536
29. Watson A.B. The Cortex Transform: rapid computation of simulated neural images. Comput Vis Graph Image Process 39 (1987) 311-327
30. Peli E. Contrast in complex images. J Opt Soc Am A 7 (1990) 2032-2040
31. Daly S. The Visual Differences Predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. In: Watson A.B. (Ed). Digital images and human vision (1993), MIT Press, Cambridge (MA) 179-206
32. Hubel D.H., and Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields, binocular integration and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Phys 160 (1962) 106-154
33. Stromeyer C.F., and Julesz B. Spatial-frequency masking in vision: critical bands and spread of masking. J Opt Soc Am A 62 (1972) 1221-1232
34. Lubin J. A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation. In: Peli E. (Ed). Vision models for target detection and recognition (1995), World Scientific, River Edge (NJ) 245-283
35. Green D., and Swetsm J.A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics (1974), Krieger, New York
36. Otto L.R. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis (1993), Duxbury Press, Belmont (CA)
37. Burgess A.E., Li X., and Abbey C.K. Visual signal detectability with two noise components: anomalous masking effects. J Opt Soc Am A 14 (1997) 2420-2442
38. Jackson W.B., Said M.R., Jared D.A., Larimer J.O., Gille J.L., and Lubin J.L. Evaluation of human vision models for predicting human-observer performance. Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging: Image Perception (1997), SPIE, Bellingham (WA) 64-73
39. Chakraborty D.P. Predicting detection task performance using a visual discrimination model. Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging 2004: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, Belliham, WA (2004) 53-61
40. Chakraborty D.P. Predicting detection task performance using a visual discrimination model II. Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging 2005: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, Belliham, WA (2005) 191-198
41. Eckstein M.P., Zhang Y., and Pham B.T. Metrics of medical image quality: task-based model observers vs. image discrimination/perceptual difference models. Proceedings of SPIE, Medical Imaging 2004: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment (2004) 42-52
42. Siddiqui K.M., Johnson J.P., Reiner B.I., and Siegel E.L. Discrete cosine transform JPEG compression vs. 2D JPEG2000 compression: JND matrix visual discrimination model image quality analysis. Proceedings of SPIE, Medical Imaging 2005: PACS and Imaging Informatics (2005) 202-207