Predicting detection task performance using a visual discrimination model - II

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 5749, Issue , 2005, Pages 191-198

  Chakraborty, Dev P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Detection; Discrimination; Image quality; Model observers; VDM

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; IMAGE QUALITY; LAW ENFORCEMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING; VISION;

DETECTION; DETECTION TASKS; DISCRIMINATION; INPUT IMAGES; LEVEL SETTINGS; MODEL OBSERVERS; OBSERVER PERFORMANCES; QUALITY OPTIMIZATIONS; ROC STUDIES; TARGET DETECTABILITY; VDM; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION MODELS;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 24644453843     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.594609     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. W. B. Jackson, P. Beebee, D. A. Jared, D. K. Biegelsen, J. O. Larimer, J. Lubin, and J. Gille, "X-ray image system design using a human visual model", Proc. SPIE, 2708, 29-40, (1996).
2. W. B. Jackson, M. R. Said, D. A. Jared, J. O. Larimer, J. Gille, and J. Lubin "Evaluation of human vision models for predicting human observer performance", Proc. SPIE, 3036, 64-73, (1997).
3. B. Li, G. W. Meyer, and R. V. Klassen, "A Comparison of Two Image Quality Models", Proc. SPIE, 3299, 98-109, (1998).
4. J. P. Johnson, J. Lubin, E. A. Krupinski, H. A. Peterson, H. Roehrig, and A. Baysinger, "Visual discrimination model for digital mammography", Proc. SPIE, 3663, 253-263, (1999).
5. E. A. Krupinski, J. P. Johnson, H. Roehrig, and J. Lubin, "Optimizing soft copy mammography displays using a human visual system model: influence of display phosphor", Proc. SPIE, 4686, 331-337, (2002).
6. J. P. Johnson, E. A. Krupinski, J. S. Nafziger, J. Lubin, J. P. Wus, and H. Roehrig, "Perceptually optimized compression of mammograms", Proc. SPIE, 4686, 252-262, (2002).
7. E. A. Krupinski, J. Johnson, H. Roehrig, and J. Lubin. Using observer models to predict softcopy performance with digital mammography. in Sixth International Workshop on Digital Mammography. 2002. Bremen, Germany.
8. J. P. Johnson, J. S. Nafziger, E. A. Krupinski, J. Lubin, and H. Roehrig "Effects of grayscale window/level parameters on breast lesion detectability", Proc. SPIE, 5034, 462-473, (2003).
9. E. A. Krupinski, J. P. Johnson, H. Roehrig, J. Lubin, and M. Engstrom "Human vision model to predict observer performance: detection of microcalcifications as a function of monitor phosphor", Proc. SPIE, 5034, 20-24, (2003).
10. E. A. Krupinski, H. Roehrig, M. Engstrom, J. P. Johnson, and J. Lubin, "MTF correction for optimizing softcopy display of digital mammograms: use of a vision model for predicting observer performance", Proc. SPIE, 5034, 323-327, (2003).
11. E. A. Krupinski, J. Johnson, H. Roehrig, M. Engstrom, J. Fan, J. Nafziger, J. Lubin, and W. J. Dallas, "Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of MTF compensation", Academic Radiology, 10, 1030-1035., (2003).
12. E. Krupinski, J. Johnson, H. Roehrig, and J. Lubin, "Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of display phosphor", Academic Radiology, 10, 161-166., (2003).
13. E. A. Krupinski, J. Johnson, H. Roehrig, and J. Lubin, Using observer models to predict softcopy performance with digital mammography, in Digital Mammography 2002, H.O. Peitgen, Editor. 2003, Springer Verlag,: New York, NY. p. 463-467.
14. E. A. Krupinski, J. Johnson, H. Roehrig, J. Nafziger, J. Fan, and J. Lubin "Use of a human visual system model to predict the effects of display veiling glare on observer performance", Proc. SPIE, 5372, 423-429, (2004).
15. J. Johnson, J. Nafziger, J. Lubin, E. A. Krupinski, and H. Roehrig. Human visual system model for selecting the optimal display, in 18th International Computer Assisted Radiology & Surgery Conference. 2004. Chicago, IL.
16. M. Trevino, "Mathematical model approximates human visual perception of compressed images", Diagnostic Imaging Webcasts, http://www. diagnosticimaging.com/webcast04/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=54201047. (2004).
17. D. P. Chakraborty, "Predicting medical detection task performance using a visual discrimination model (VDM)", Medical Physics (under consideration), see http://jafroc.radiology.pitt.edu. (2005).
18. D. P. Chakraborty, "Predicting detection task performance using a visual discrimination model", Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging 2004: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 5372, 53-61, (2004).
19. H. H. Barrett and K. Myers Foundations of Image Science, ed. B.E.A. Saleh. 2003, Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley and Sons.
20. J. Ahumada, Albert J. and B. L. Beard, "Image Discrimination Models Predict Detection in Fixed but not Random Noise", Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 14, 2471-2476, (1997).
21. J. Ahumada, Albert J. and B. L. Beard, "Image Discrimination Models: Detection in Fixed and Random Noise", SPIE Proc, 3016, 34-43, (1997).
22. A. J. Ahumada Jr., "Computational image quality metrics: a review", SID Digest, 24, 305-308, (1993).
23. A. M. Rohaly, J. Ahumada, Albert J., and A. B. Watson, "Object Detection in Natural Backgrounds Predicted by Discrimination Performance and Models", Vision Research, 37, 3225-3235, (1997).
24. A. E. Burgess, F. L. Jacobson, and P. F. Judy, "Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise", Med. Phys., 28, 419-437, (2001).
25. A. E. Burgess and P. F. Judy, "Detection in power-law noise: spectrum exponents and CD diagram slopes", Proc. SPIE, 5034, 57-62, (2003).
26. E. Samei, M. J. Flynn, and W. R. Eyler, "Simulation of subtle lung nodules in projection chest radiography", Radiology, 202, 117-124, (1997).
27. A. E. Burgess, "Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods", Med. Phys., 22, 643-655, (1995).
28. A. E. Burgess, "Evaluation of detection model performance in power-law noise", Proc. SPIE, 4324, 419-437, (2001).