Bonded indirect restorations for posterior teeth: From cavity preparation to provisionalization

Quintessence International

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 371-379

  Rocca, Giovanni Tommaso ^a,b   Krejci, Ivo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b Section of Dental Medicine   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Adhesive sealing; Esthetics; Indirect restorations

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; COMPOSITE DENTAL RESIN; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CERAMICS; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ACRYLIC RESINS; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL RESTORATION, TEMPORARY; HUMANS; POLYURETHANES;

EID: 34249098957     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ardu S, Perroud R, Krejci I. Extended sealing of interproximal caries lesions. Quintessence Int 2006;37: 423-427.
2. Lutz F, Krejci I. Resin composites in the post-amalgam age. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20:1138-1148.
3. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:241-249.
4. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore memorial lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004;29: 481-508.
5. Mörmann W. Kompositinlay: Forschungsmodell mit Praxispotential? Quintessenz 1982;33:1891-1900.
6. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998;10:47-54.
7. Smales RJ. Rubber-dam usage related to restoration quality and survival. Br Dent J 1993;174: 330-333.
8. Carvalho RM, Santiago SL, Fernandes CAO, Suh BI, Pashley DH. Effect of prism orientation on tensile strength of enamel. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:252-257.
9. Bertschinger C, Paul SJ, Luthi H, Sharer P. Dual application of dentin bonding agents: Effect on bond strength. Am J Dent 1996;9:115-119.
10. Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:1033-1042.
11. Dietschi D, Monasevic M, Krejci I, Davidson C. Marginal and internal adaptation of class II restorations after immediate or delayed composite placement. J Dent 2002;30:259-269.
12. Stavridakis MM, Krejci I, Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing of onlay preparations: Thickness of precured dentin bonding agent and effect of surface cleaning. Oper Dent 2005;30:747-757.
13. Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94: 511-519.
14. Yap AU, Shah KC, Loh ET, Sim SS, Tan CC. Influence of eugenol-containing temporary restorations on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent 2001;26:556-561.
15. Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B, Svizero N, Carvalho RM, Yiu C. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials 2005;26:6449-6459.
16. Soh MS, Yap AU, Siow KS. The effectiveness of cure of LED and halogen curing lights at varying cavity depths. Oper Dent 2003;28:707-715.
17. Shulte AG, Vockler A, Reinhardt R. Longevity of ceramic inlays and onlays luted with a solely light-curing composite resin. J Dent 2005;33:433-442.
18. Dietschi D, Olsburgh S, Krejci I, Davidson C. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:73-80.
19. Hofmann N, Just N, Haller B, Hugo B, Klaiber B. The effect of glass ionomer cement or composite resin bases on restoration of cuspal stiffness of endodontically treated premolars in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 1998;2:77-83.
20. Krejci I, Boretti R. Resin-based composites for indirect adhesive tooth-colored restorations. [Proceedings of the Academy of Dental Materials, Oct 2001, Siena, ltaly.];5:31-36
21. Labella R, Lambrechts R Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 1999;15:128-137.
22. Stavridakis MM, Dietschi D, Krejci I. Polymerization shrinkage of flowable resin-based restorative materials. Oper Dent 2005;30:118-128.
23. De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Coutinho E, et al. Fatigue resistance of dentin/composite interfaces with an additional intermediate elastic layer. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:77-82.
24. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Pelka M, Petshelt A. Internal adaptation and overhang formation of direct Class II resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig 1999;3:208-215.
25. Bortolotto T, Krejci I. The effect of temperature on hardness of a light-curing composite [abstract 119]. J Dent Res 2003;82(special issue A).
26. Van Meerbeek B, De Munk J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-235.
27. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005; 21:864-881.
28. De Munck J, Vargas M, Iracki J, et al. One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2005;30:39-49.
29. Black AD. Preventive treatment of periodontal diseases. Northwest Dent J 1912;10:60-73.
30. Broadbent JM, Williams KB, Thomson WM, Williams SM. Dental restorations: A risk factor for periodontal attachment loss? J Clin Periodontol 2006;33: 803-810.
31. Paolantonio M, D'Ercole S, Perinetti G, et al. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:200-207.