In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 111, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 73-80

  Dietschi, Didier ^a   Olsburgh, Steven ^a   Krejci, Ivo ^a   Davidson, Carel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Base lining; Class II restoration; Composite inlay; Internal adaptation; Marginal adaptation

Indexed keywords

RESIN; COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DYRACT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRODIGY; REVOLUTION (COMPOSITE RESIN); SILICATE; TETRIC FLOW COMPOSITE RESIN;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MECHANICAL STRESS; MOLAR TOOTH; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH FRACTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; MATERIALS TESTING; RANDOMIZATION; WEIGHT BEARING;

COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SILICATES; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 0038823715     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00004.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. LUTZ F, KULL M. The development of a posterior tooth composite system, in vitro investigation. Schweiz Mschr Zahnheilk 1980; 90: 455-483.
2. LUTZ F, KREJCI I, LUESCHER B, OLDENBURG TR. Improved proximal margin adaptation of Class II composite resin restorations by use of light-reflecting wedges. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 659-664.
3. LUTZ F, KREJCI I, OLDENBURG TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margin of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 777-784.
4. WEAVER WS, BLANK LW, PELLEU GB. A visible-light-activated resin cured through tooth structure. General Dent 1988; 36: 236-237.
5. BERTOLOTTI R. Posterior composite technique utilizing directed polymerization shrinkage and a novel matrix. Pract Periodont Aesth Dent 1991; 3: 53-58.
6. DONLY KJ, WILD TW, BOWEN RL, JENSEN ME. An in vitro investigation of the effect of glass inserts on the effective composite resin polymerization shrinkage. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1234-1237.
7. FRIEDL KH, SCHMALZ G, HILLER KA, MORTAZAVI F. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/ composite sandwich restorations. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 21-29.
8. BOWEN RL, NEMOTO K, RAPSON JE. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues: forces developing in composite materials during hardening. J Am Dent Assoc 1983; 106: 475-477.
9. DAVIDSON CL, DE GEE AJ, FEILZER A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1396-1399.
10. DE GEE AJ, FEILZER A, DAVIDSON CL. True linear polymerization shrinkage of unfilled resins and composites determinated with a linometer. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 11-14.
11. LEUNG RL, FAN PL, JOHNSTON WM. Post-irradiation polymerization of visible light-activated composite resin. J Dent Res 1983; 62: 262-265.
12. KILDAL KK, RUYTER IE. How different curing methods affect the degree of conversion of resin-based inlay/onlay materials. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52: 315-322.
13. DIETSCHI D, SPREAFICO R. Adhesive metal-free restorations: current concepts for the esthetic treatment of posterior teeth. Quintessence, Berlin. 1997, 60-77.
14. DIETSCHI D, SPREAFICO R. Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored restorations. Pract Periodont Aesth Dent 1998; 10: 47-54.
15. DAVIDSON CL. Glass ionomer bases under posterior composites. J Esth Dent 1994; 6: 223-226.
16. CARVALHO RM, PEREIRA JC, YOSHIYAMA M, PASHLEY DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996; 21: 17-24.
17. SCOTT JA, STRANG R, SAUNDERS WT. The plane of fracture and shear bond strength of three composite inlay systems. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 208-210.
18. KREJCI I, FUELLEMAN J, LUTZ F. Klinische and Rasterelektronenmikroskopische Langzeituntersuchung von Kompositinlays. Schweiz Monatschr Zahmed 1994; 104: 1351-1356.
19. ANDREWS SA, VAN HASSEL HJ, BROWN AC. A method for determining the physiologic basis of pulp sensory response. A preliminary report. J Hasp Dent Prac 1972; 6: 49-53.
20. CIUCCHI B, BOUILLAGUET S, HOLZ J, PASHLEY DH. Dentinal fluid dynamics in human teeth, in vivo. J Endodont 1995; 21: 191-194.
21. KREJCI I, REICH T, LUTZ F, ALBERTONI M. In-vitro Testverfahren zur Evaluation dentaler Restaurationssysteme. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990; 100: 953-959.
22. KREJCI I, HEINZMANN JL, LUTZ F. Verschleiss von Schmelz, Amalgam und ihrer Schmelz-Antagonisten im Computer gesteuerte Kausimulator. Schweiz Monatschr Zahmed 1990; 100: 1285-1291.
23. LUESCHER B, LUTZ F, OSCHENBEIN H, MUEHLEMANN HR. Microleakage and marginal adaptation in conventional and adhesive Class II restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1977; 37: 300-309.
24. ROULET JF. Degradation of dental polymers. Basel: Karger, 1990, 108-110.
25. PERDIGÃO J, LAMBRECHTS P, VAN MEERBEEK B, LOPES ALB. A field emission SEM comparison of four postfixation drying techniques for human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29: 1111-1120.
26. SACHS L. Angewandte Statistik: Planung und Auswertung Methoden und Modelle. Berlin: Springer 1974, 420-422.
27. MUNECHIKA T, SUSUKI K, NISHIYAMA M, OHASHI M, HORIE K. A comparison of the tensile bond strengths of composite resins to longitudinal and transverse sections of enamel prisms in human teeth. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1079-1082.
28. CARVALHO RM, SANTIAGO SL, FERNANDES CAO, SUH BI, PASHLEY DH. Effect of prism orientation on tensile strength of enamel. J Adhesive Dent 2000; 2: 252-257.
29. KREJCI I, GLAUSER R, SAEGESSER D, LUTZ F. Marginale Adaptation und Vergleissfestigkeit eines Feinhybridkomposit-Inlays in vitro. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1993; 103: 973-978.
30. DIETSCHI D, HERZFELD D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106: 1033-1042.
31. DIETSCHI D, MOOR L. Evaluation of the marginal and internal adaptation of different ceramic and composite inlay systems after an in vitro fatigue test. J Adhesive Dent 1999; 1: 41-56.
32. DIETSCHI D, SCAMPA U, CAMPANILE G, HOLZ J. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect Class II composite resin restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 127-137.
33. DIETSCHI D, BINDI G, KREJCI I, DAVIDSON C. Marginal and internal adaptation of stratified compomer-composite class II restorations. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 500-509.
34. SUH B. Principi di base, evoluzione e sviluppi dell'adesione in odontoiatria. In: LIGURE SM, ed. Odontoiatria adesiva oggi. Proceedings of the International Symposium of Adhesive Dentistry, May, 14-15, 1997, Hippocrates Edizioni Medico-Scientifiche, 1997, 44-55.
35. KEMP-SCHOLTE CM, DAVIDSON CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 658-664.
36. KEMP-SCHOLTE CM, DAVIDSON CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1240-1243.
37. STAVRIDAKIS M, KAKABOURA A, KREJCI I. Linear polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage forces of resin-based restorative materials. Odontostomatologiki Proodos 2000; 54: 213-225.
38. FEILZER A, DE GEE AJ, DAVIDSON CL. Setting stress in resin composite in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1636-1639.
39. TAM LE, MCCOMB D. Shear bond strength of resin luting cements to laboratory-made composite resin veneers. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 314-321.
40. MATSUMARA H, HISANATSU N, ATSUTA M. Effect of unfilled resins and a silane primer on bonding between layers of a light-activated composite resin veneering material. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 386-391.
41. TIRLET G. Inlays céramique et composite collés. étude des mécanismes d'adhésion et d'adhérence aux interfaces. Thesis. Paris: Université René Descartes (Paris V), 1997.
42. PASHLEY DH. The effects of acid etching on the pulpodentin complex. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 229-242.
43. NAKABAYASHI N, KOJIMA K, MASUHARA E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16: 265-273.
44. VAN MEERBEEK B, MOHRBACHER H, CELIS JP, ROOS JR, BRAEM M, LAMBRECHTS P, VANHERLE G. Chemical characterization of the resin-dentin interface by micro-raman spectroscopy. J Dent Rex 1993; 72: 1423-1428.
45. PASHLEY DH, CIUCCHI B, SANO H, HORNER JA. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 618-631.
46. DIETSCHI D, MAGNE P, HOLZ J. Bonded to tooth ceramic restorations: in vitro evaluation of the efficiency and failure mode of two modern adhesives. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1995; 105: 299-305.
47. RUEGGEBERG FA, MARGESON DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled-filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1652-1758.
48. DURET B, REYNAUD M, DURET F. Un nouveau concept de reconstitution corono-radiculaire: le composipost (1). Chir Dent Fr 1990; 542: 131-141.
49. REES JS, JACOBSEN PH, HICKMAN J. The elasticity modulus of dentine determined by static and dynamic methods. Clin Mat 1994; 17: 11-15.
50. KINNEY JH, BALOOCH M, MARSHALL SJ, MARSHALL GW, WEIHS TP. Hardness and Young's modulus of human peritubular and intertubular dentin. Arch Oral Biol 1996; 41: 9-13.
51. KINNEY JH, BALOOCH M, MARSHALL GW, MARSHALL SJ. A micromechanics model of the elastic properties of human dentin. Arch Oral Biol 1999; 10: 813-822.