Effects of prism orientation on tensile strength of enamel

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 251-257

  Carvalho, Ricardo M ^a   Santiago, Sergio L ^b   Fernandas, Carlos A O ^b   Suh, Byoung I ^c   Pashley, David H ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF CEARÁ   (Brazil)

^c Bisco Inc   (United States)

^d MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; PHOSPHORIC ACID; RESIN; SILICON DIOXIDE; SINGLE BOND; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; ENAMEL; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICS; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR, THIRD; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; SILICON DIOXIDE; STATISTICS; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURES; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0034577017     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bowen RL, Rodriguez MS. Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of tooth structure and several restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1962;64:378-387.
2. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984;63:1396-1399.
3. Feilzer AJ, Dooren LH, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sei 1995;103:322-326.
4. Hassan R, Caputo AA, Bunshah RF. Fracture toughness of human enamel. J Dent Res 1981;60:820-827.
5. Kanca J. Use of 45° cavosurface margin reduces occlusal surface dye penetration [abstract 3777]. J Dent Res 2000; 79(special issue):616.
6. Lösche GM, Hilbig WH, Roulet JF. The margin quality of direct posterior composite restorations close to the CEJ [abstract 1889]. J Dent Res 1992;71:752.
7. Lösche GM. Marginal adaptation of Class II composite fillings: Guided polymerization vs. reduced light intensity. J Adhesive Dent 1999;l:31-39.
8. Munechika T, Suzuki K, Nishiyama M, Ohashi M, Horie K. A comparison of the tensile bond strengths of composite resins to longitudinal and transverse sections of enamel prisms in human teeth. J Dent Res 1984;63:1079-1082.
9. Osborne JW. Evaluation of previous assessments of prism directions in human enamel. J Dent Res 1968;47:217-222.
10. Rasmussen ST, Patchin RE, Scott DB, Heuer AH. Fracture properties of human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 1976; 55:154-164.
11. Roulet JF. The problems associated with substituting composite resins for amalgam: a status report on posterior composites. J Dent 1988;16:101-113.
12. Shono Y, Terashita M, Pashley EL, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Effects of cross-sectional area on resin-enamel tensile bond strength. Dent Mater 1997;13:290-296.
13. Skobe Z, Stern S. The pathways of enamel rods at the base of cusps of human teeth. J Dent Res 1980;59:1026-1032.
14. Uno S, Asmussen E. Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. Scand J Dent Res 1991:99:440-444.
15. Unterbrink GL Muessner R. Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems. J Dent 1995;23:183-189.
16. Xu HHK, Smith DT, Jahanmir S, Romberg E, Kelly JR, Thompson VP, Rekow ED. Indentation damage and mechanical properties of human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 1998:77:472-480.
17. Xu HHK, Kelly JR, Jahanmir S, Thompson VP, Rekow ED. Enamel subsurface damage due to tooth preparation with diamonds. J Dent Res 1997:76:1698-1706.