Marginal and internal adaptation of class II restorations after immediate or delayed composite placement

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 30, Issue 5-6, 2002, Pages 259-269

  Dietschi, Didier ^a   Monasevic, Manuela ^a   Krejci, Ivo ^a   Davidson, Carel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Class II restorations; Composite; Internal adaptation; Marginal adaptation

Indexed keywords

GOLD; ACETONE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; OPTIBOND; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME AND BOND 2.1; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ABSORPTION; ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DENTISTRY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; STRESS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HARDNESS; HISTOLOGY; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CERVIX; ULTRASTRUCTURE; WEIGHT BEARING;

ACETONE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HARDNESS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; REPLICA TECHNIQUES; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH CERVIX; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 0036654685     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00041-6     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Bowen RL, Nemoto K, Rapson JE. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues: forces developing in composite materials during hardening. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;106:475-7.
2. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984;63:1396-9.
3. De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. True linear polymerization shrinkage of unfilled resins and composites determinated with a linometer. Dent Mater 1993;9:11-14.
4. Stavridakis M, Kakaboura A, Krejci I. Linear polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage forces of resin-based restorative materials. Odontostomatologiki Proodos 2000;54:213-25.
5. Lutz F, Kull M. The development of a posterior tooth composite system, in vitro investigation. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilk 1980;90:455-83.
6. Lutz F, Krejci I, Luescher B, Oldenburg TR. Improved proximal margin adaptation of class II composite resin restorations by use of light-reflecting wedges. Quintessence Int 1986;17:659-64.
7. Weaver WS, Blank LW, Pelleu GB. A visible-light-activated resin cured through tooth structure. Gen Dent 1988;36:236-7.
8. Bertolotti R. Posterior composite technique utilizing directed polymerization shrinkage and a novel matrix. Pract Periodont Aesth Dent 1991;3:53-8.
9. Donly KJ, Wild TW, Bowen RL, Jensen ME. An in vitro investigation of the effect of glass inserts on the effective composite resin polymerization shrinkage. J Dent Res 1989;68:1234-7.
10. Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. The effect of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res 2000;79:812-7.
11. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margin of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986;17:777-84.
12. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Mortazavi F. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations. Oper Dent 1997;22:21-9.
13. Bindi G. Evaluation of the marginal adaptation of stratified compomer-composite class II restorations following an in vitro fatigue test. Dissertation. Geneva, Switzerland: University of Geneva; 1998.
14. May Jr. KN, Swift Jr. EJ, Bayne SC. Bond strengths of a new dentin adhesive system. Am J Dent 1997;10:195-8.
15. Wakefield CW, Draughn RA, Sneed WD, Davis TN. Shear bond strengths of six bonding systems using the pushout method of in vitro testing. Oper Dent 1998;23:69-76.
16. Wilder AD, Swift EJ, May Jr. KN, Waddell SL. Bond strengths of conventional and simplified bonding systems. Am J Dent 1998;11:114-7.
17. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2000;16:180-7.
18. Carvalho RM, Santiago SL, Fernandes CAO, Suh BI, Pashley DH. Effect of prism orientation on tensile strength of enamel. J Adhesive Dent 2000;2:252-7.
19. Feilzer A, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in resin composite in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-9.
20. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res 1999;78:898-905.
21. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:658-64.
22. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990;69:1240-3.
23. Perdigao J, Swift EJ. Analysis of dental adhesive systems using scanning electron microscopy. Int J Dent 1994;44:349-59.
24. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Adhesive metal-free restorations: current concepts for the esthetic treatment of posterior teeth. Berlin: Quintessence publishing; 1997. p. 60-77.
25. Krejci I, Glauser R, Saegesser D, Lutz F. Marginale Adaptation und Vergleissfestigkeit eines Feinhybridkomposit-Inlays in vitro. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1993;103:973-8.
26. Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:1033-42.
27. Burrow MF, Tagami J, Negishi T, Nikaido T, Hosoda H. Early tensile bond strengths of several enamel and dentin bonding systems. J Dent Res 1994;73:522-8.
28. Burrow MF, Nikaido T, Satoh M, Tagami JH. Early bonding of resin cements to dentin-effect of bonding environment. Oper Dent 1996;21:196-202.
29. Braga RR, Ballester RY, Daronch M. Influence of time and adhesive system on the extrusion shear bond strength between feldspathic porcelain and bovine dentin. Dent Mater 2000;16:303-10.
30. Andrews SA, Van Hassel HJ, Brown AC. A method for determining the physiologic basis of pulp sensory response. A preliminary report. J Hosp Dent Prac 1972;6:49-53.
31. Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S, Holz J, Pashley DH. Dentinal fluid dynamics in human teeth, in vivo. J Endodont 1995;21:191-4.
32. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. In vitro Testverfahren zur Evaluation dentaler Restaurationssysteme. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:953-9.
33. Krejci I, Heinzmann JL, Lutz F. Verschleiss von Schmelz-Aantagonisten im computer gesteuerten Kausimulator. Schweiz Monatschr Zahmed 1990;100:1285-91.
34. Luescher B, Lutz F, Oschenbein H, Muehlemann HR. Microleakage and marginal adaptation in conventional and adhesive class II restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1977;37:300-9.
35. Roulet JF. Degradation of dental polymers. Basel: Karger AG; 1990. p. 108-110.
36. Sachs L. Angewanadte Statistik: planung und auswertung. Methoden und modelle, Berlin: Springer; 1974. p. 420-422.
37. Krejci I. Zahnfarbene restaurationen: qualität. Potential und indikationen, Munich: Carl Hanser; 1992. p. 38-56.
38. Dietschi D, Moor L. Evaluation of the marginal and internal adaptation of different ceramic and composite inlay systems after an in vitro fatigue test. J Adhesive Dent 1999;1:41-56.
39. Munechika T, Susuki K, Nishiyama M, Ohashi M, Horie K. A comparison of the tensile bond strengths of composite resins to longitudinal and transverse sections of enamel prisms in human teeth. J Dent Res 1984;63:1079-82.
40. Dietschi D, Olsburgh S, Krejci I, Davidson C. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases. Eur J Oral Sci 2003 (in press).
41. Dietschi D, Scampa U, Holz J. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect class II composite resin restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quintessence Int 1995;26:127-38.
42. Davidson CL. Glass ionomer bases under posterior composites. J Esth Dent 1994;6:223-6.
43. Swift EJ, Triolo PT, Barkmeier WW, Bird JL, Bound SJ. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. Am J Dent 1996;9:100-4.
44. Van Meerbeek B, Mohrbacher H, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Chemical characterization of the resindentin interface by micro-Raman spectroscopy. J Dent Res 1993;72:1423-8.
45. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled-filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990;69:1652-78.
46. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1992;71:1530-40.
47. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Montanari G, Pashley DH. Thickness and morphology of resin-infiltrated dentin layer in Young, old and sclerotic dentin. Oper Dent 1999;24:66-72.
48. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J. Bonded to tooth ceramic restorations: in vitro evaluation of the efficiency and failure mode of two modern adhesives. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1995;105:299-305.
49. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 1999;24:147-55.
50. Krejci I, Stavridakis M. New perspectives on dentin adhesion - the different ways of bonding. Pract Periodont Aesth Dent 2000;12:727-32.
51. Thonemann B, Federlin M, Schalz G, Grundler W. Total bonding vs selective bonding: marginal adaptation of class 2 composite restorations. Oper Dent 1999;24:261-71.
52. Nakabayashi N. Resin reinforced dentin due to infiltration of monomers into dentin at the adhesive interface. Dent Mater J 1982;1:78-81.
53. Pashley DH. The effects of acid etching on the pulpodentin complex. Oper Dent 1992;17:229-42.
54. Amstrong SR, Boyer DB, Keller JC. Micro tensile bond strength testing and failure analysis of two dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1998;14:44-51.
55. Schreiner RF, Chapell RP, Glaros AG, Eick JD. Microtensile testing of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1998;14:192-201.
56. Tay FR, Carvalho R, Sano H, Pashley DH. Effect of smear layers on the bonding of self-etching primer to dentin. J Adhesive Dent 2000;2:99-116.
57. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996;21:17-24.
58. Krejci I, Lutz F. Composite fillings - the 1 X 1 of finishing. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1984;94:1015-28.
59. Davidson CL. Glass ionomer bases under posterior composites. J Esth Dent 1994;6:223-6.
60. Herr P, Ciucchi B, Holz J. Méthode de positionnement de répliques destinée au contrôle clinique des matériaux d'obturation. J Biol Buccale 1981;9:17-26.
61. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvahlo RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res 1999;78:699-705.
62. Tay RF, Gwiinnet JA, Wei SHY. The overwet phenomenum in two-component acetone-based primers containing aryl amine and carboxylic acid monomers. Dental Materials 1996;13:118-127.
63. President light body, Coltène, Alstätten, Switzerland.