Contrast-enhanced first-pass myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging with parallel acquisition at 3.0 Tesla

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 352-360

  Ruan, Chun ^a,c   Yang, Scott H ^b,d   Cusi, Kenneth ^a   Gao, Feng ^a   Clarke, Geoffrey D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^d KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

Author keywords

3 Tesla; Image quality; Magnetic resonance imaging; Myocardial perfusion; Parallel imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

EID: 34249045988     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000262566.89636.3f     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Nagel E, Al-Saadi N, Fleck E. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance: myocardial perfusion. Herz. 2000;25:409-416.
2. Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M, et al. Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2000;101:1379-1383.
3. Ibrahim T, Nekolla SG, Schreiber K, et al. Assessment of coronary flow reserve: comparison between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:864-870.
4. Penzkofer H, Wintersperger BJ, Knez A, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion using multisection first-pass MRI and color-coded parameter maps: a comparison to 99mTc SestaMIBI SPECT and systolic myocardial wall thickening analysis. Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;17:161-170.
5. Gerber BL, Bluemke DA, Chin BB, et al. Single-vessel coronary artery stenosis: myocardial perfusion imaging with Gadomer-17 first-pass MR imaging in a swine model of comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology. 2002;225:104-112.
6. Wilke N, Simm C, Zhang J, et al. Contrast-enhanced first pass myocardial perfusion imaging: correlation between myocardial blood flow in dogs at rest and during hyperemia. Magn Reson Med. 1993;29:485-497.
7. Christian TF, Rettmann DW, Aletras AH, et al. Absolute myocardial perfusion in canines measured by using dual-bolus first-pass MR imaging. Radiology. 2004;232:677-684.
8. Bertschinger KM, Nanz D, Buechi M, et al. Magnetic resonance myocardial first-pass perfusion imaging: parameter optimization for signal response and cardiac coverage. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;14:556-562.
9. Barkhausen J, Ruehm SG, Goyen M, et al. MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study. Radiology. 2001;219:264-269.
10. Schreiber WG, Schmitt M, Kalden P, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion imaging using saturation-prepared TrueFISP. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16:641-652.
11. Hinton DP, Wald LL, Pitts J, et al. Comparison of cardiac MRI on 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla clinical whole body systems. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:436-442.
12. Greenman RL, Shirosky JE, Mulkern RV, et al. Double inversion black-blood fast spin-echo imaging of the human heart: a comparison between 1.5 T and 3.0 T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:648-655.
13. Hoult DI. Sensitivity and power deposition in a high field imaging experiment. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:46-67.
14. Sodickson DK, Manning WJ. Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn Reson Med. 1997;38:591-603.
15. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Boesiger P. Cardiac real-time imaging using SENSE. SENSitivity encoding scheme. Magn Reson Med. 2000;43:177-184.
16. McGee KP, Debbins JP, Boskamp EB, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance parallel imaging at 3.0 Tesla: technical feasibility and advantages. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;19:291-297.
17. Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K, Dietrich O, et al. Single breath-hold real-time cine MR imaging: improved temporal resolution using generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) algorithm. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1931-1936.
18. Bottomley PA, Foster TH, Argersinger RE, et al. A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1 to 100 MHz: dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision and age. Med Phys. 1984;11:425-448.
19. Ba-Ssalamah A, Nöbauer-Huhmann IM, Pinker K, et al. Effect of contrast dose and field strength in the magnetic resonance detection of brain metastases. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:415-422.
20. Jerosch-Herold M, Wilke N, Stillman AE. Magnetic resonance quantification of the myocardial perfusion reserve with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution. Med Phys. 1998;25:73-84.
21. Epstein FH, Mugler JP, Brookeman JR. Spoiling of transverse magnetization in gradient-echo (GRE) imaging during the approach to steady state. Magn Reson Med. 1996;35:237-245.
22. Jerosch-Herold M, Seethamraju RT, Swingen CM, et al. Analysis of myocardial perfusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;19:758-770.
23. Elkington AG, He T, Gatehouse PD, et al. Optimization of the arterial input function for myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;21:354-359.
24. Hunold P, Maderwald S, Ladd ME, et al. Parallel acquisition techniques in cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging using TrueFISP sequences: comparison of image quality and artifacts. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20:506-511.
25. Barkhausen J, Hunold P, Jochims M, et al. Imaging of myocardial perfusion with magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;19:750-757.
26. Di Bella EV, Parker DL, Sinusas AJ. On the dark rim artifact in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI myocardial perfusion studies. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:1295-1299.
27. Schar M, Kozerke S, Fischer SE, et al. Cardiac SSFP imaging at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51:799-806.
28. Kostler H, Sandstede JJ, Lipke C, et al. Auto-SENSE perfusion imaging of the whole human heart. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;18:702-708.
29. Reeder SB, Wintersperger BJ, Dietrich O, et al. Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:748-754.
30. Kellman P, McVeigh ER. Image reconstruction in SNR units: a general method for SNR measurement. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:1439-1447.
31. Vogt FM, Antoch G, Hunold P, et al. Parallel acquisition techniques for accelerated volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination magnetic resonance imaging of the upper abdomen: assessment of image quality and lesion conspicuity. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;21:376-382.
32. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation. 2001;103:2230-2235.
33. Chiu CW, So NMC, Lam WWM, et al. Combined first-pass perfusion and viability study at MR imaging in patients with non-ST segmentelevation acute coronary syndromes: feasibility study. Radiology. 2003;226:717-722.
34. Sipola P, Lauerma K, Husso-Saastamoinen M, et al. First-pass MR imaging in the assessment of perfusion impairment in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and the Asp175Asn mutation of the α-tropomyosin gene. Radiology. 2003;226:129-137.
35. Guttman MA, Kellman P, Dick AJ, et al. Real-time accelerated MRI with adaptive TSENSE and UNFOLD. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50:315-321.
36. Tsao J, Boesiger P, Pruessmann KP. k-t BLAST and k-t SENSE: dynamic MRI with high frame rate exploiting spatiotemporal correlations. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50:1031-1042.
37. Breuer FA, Kellman P, Griswold MA, et al. Dynamic autocalibrated parallel imaging using temporal GRAPPA (TGRAPPA). Magn Reson Med. 2006;53:981-985.
38. Yeh EN, Stuber M, McKenzie CA, et al. Inherently self-calibrating non-Cartesian parallel imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:1-8.