Displaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussion

Research on Language and Social Interaction

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 453-479

  Waring, Hansun Zhang ^a  

^a MERCY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038784324     PISSN: 08351813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3504_3     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Beun, R. J. (1990). The recognition of Dutch declarative questions. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 39-56.
2. Beun, R. J. (2000). Context and form: Declarative or interrogative: That is the question. In W. Black & H. C. Bunt (Eds.), Computational pragmatics: Abduction, belief and context (pp. 311-326). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
3. Bublitz, W. (1988). Supportive fellow-speakers and cooperative conversations. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
4. Craig, R. T., & Sanusi, E. (2000). "I'm just saying": Discourse markers of standpoint continuity, Argumentation, 14, 425-445.
5. Duncan, S., & Fiske, D. W. (1977). Face-to-face interaction: Research, methods, and theory, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 337-366). New York: Meredith.
7. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
8. Gonzales, P. A. (1996). The talk and social organization of problem-solving activities among physicists. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
9. Goodwin, C. (1986). Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies, 9, 205-217.
10. Goodwin, M. H. (1983). Aggravated correction and disagreement in children's conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 657-677.
11. Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among Black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
12. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
13. Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299-345). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14. Heritage, J. (1985). Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 95-119). London: Academic.
15. rffrt Heritage,J.C., & Watson,D.R. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. InG. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 123-162). New York: Irvington.
16. Hutchby,I. ( 1996). Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries, and power on talk radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
17. Jacoby,S., & Gonzales,P. (1991). The constitution of expert-novice in scientific discourse. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 2, 149-181.
18. Jefferson, G. (1983). Notes on some orderliness of overlap onset. Tilburg papers in language and literature (No. 28). Tilburg, The Netherlands.
19. Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 86-100). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
20. Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2000). Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. Jurafsky, D., Shriberg, L., & Biasca, D. (1997). Switchboard SWBD-DAMSL shallow-discourse-function annotation coders manual, Draft 13. University of Colorado, Boulder, and +SRI International. Available: http://www.colorado.edu/ling/jurafsky/ws97/manual.august1.html
22. Lakoff, R. (1990). Talking power: The politics of language. New York: Basic Books.
23. Lerner, G. H. (1987). Collaborative turn sequences: Sentence construction and social action. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
24. Lerner, G. H. (1994). Responsive list construction: A conversational resource for accomplishing multifaceted social action. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 20-33.
25. Mandelbaum, J. (1987). Recipient-driven storytelling in conversation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
26. McGregor, G. (Ed.). (1986). Language for hearers. New York: Pergamon.
27. McGregor, G., & White, R. S. (Eds.). (1986). The art of listening. Wolfeboro, NH: Croom Helm.
28. McGregor, G., & White, R. S. (Eds.). (1990). Reception and response: Hearer creativity and the analysis of spoken and written texts. New York: Routledge.
29. Nofsinger, R. E. (1989). Collaborating on context: Invoking alluded-to shared knowledge. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54, 227-241.
30. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Akinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 57-101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
31. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation: Volumes I and II (G. Jefferson, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
32. Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75-119). New York: Free Press.
33. Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of "uh huh" and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71-93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
34. Schegloff, E. (1991). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. R. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 150-173). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35. Schegloff, E. A. (1995). Discourse as an interactional achievement III: The omnirelevance of action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 185-212.
36. Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.
37. Schiffrin, D. (1985). Everyday argument: The organization of diversity in talk. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis, Vol. 3: Discourse and dialogue (pp. 35-47). London: Academic.
38. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39. Tannen, D., & Saville-Troike, M. (Eds.). (1985). Perspectives on silence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
40. Tracy, K. (1997). Colloquium: Dilemmas of academic discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
41. Tracy, K., & Moran, J. P. (1983). Conversational relevance in multiple-goal settings. In R. T. Craig & K. Tracy (Eds.), Conversational coherence (pp. 116-135). London: Sage.
42. Viechnicki, G. B. (1997). An empirical analysis of participant intentions: Discourse in a graduate seminar. Language and Communication, 17, 103-131.
43. Waring, H. Z. (2001). Balancing the competing interests in seminar discussion: Peering referencing and asserting vulnerability, Issues in Applied Linguistics, 12, 29-50.
44. Waring, H. Z. (in press). Expressing noncomprehension in seminar discussion. Journal of Pragmatics.