Learning the culture of interpersonal relationships: Students' understandings of personal address forms in French

Intercultural Pragmatics

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 55-80

  Liddicoat, Anthony J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248707893     PISSN: 1612295X     EISSN: 1613365X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/IP.2006.003     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ager, Dennis E. 1990. Sociolinguistics and Contemporary French. New York: Cambridge University Press
2. Bacelar da Silva, Antonio José. 2003. The effects of instruction on pragmatic development: Teaching polite refusals in English. Second Language Studies 22: 55-106
3. Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 1996. Pragmatics and language teaching: Bringing pragmatics and pedagogy together. Pragmatics and Language Learning 7: 21-39
4. -. 2001. Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics. In Kenneth R. Rose and Gabriele Kasper (eds.), Pragmatic Development in Instructional Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 13-32
5. Belz, Julie A., and Celeste Kinginger. 2002. Cross-linguistic development of address form use in telecollaborative language learning: Two case studies. Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes 59 (2): 189-214
6. -. 2003. Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms. Language Learning 53: 591-647
7. Braun, Friederike. 1988. Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
8. Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press. 253-276
9. Claudel, Chantal. 2004. De l'utilisation du système d'adresse dans l'interview de presse écrite française. Langage et Société 108
10. Crozet, Chantai, and Anthony J. Liddicoat. 1999. The challenge of intercultural language teaching: Engaging with culture in the classroom. In Joseph Lo Bianco, Anthony J. Liddicoat, and Chantai Crozet (eds.), Striving for the Third Place: Intercultural Competence through Language Education. Canberra: Language Australia. 113-126
11. Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2002. Variation, chaos et système en interlangue française. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 17: 143-167
12. -. 2004. Vous or tu! Native and non-native speakers of French on a sociolinguistic tight-rope. International Review of Applied Linguistics 42: 383-402
13. Dewaele, Jean-Marc, and Gaëlle Planchenault. Forthcoming. "Dites-moi tu"? La perception de la difficulté du système des pronoms d'adresse en français. In M. Faraco (ed.), Regards croisés sur la classe de langue: Pratiques, méthodes et théories. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l'Université de Provence
14. Dimachki, Loubna, and Neijete Hmed. 2002. "Bonjour madame!" "Bonjour mon frère!" Le system des termes d'adresse dans des interactions verbales en France, au Liban et en Tunisie. In Actes du VIIIème Congrès de l'Association pour la Rechercher InterCulturelle (ARIC), 25-28 September 2001. Geneva: University of Geneva
15. Firth, Alan, and Johannes Wagner. 1997. On discourse, communication and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal 81(3): 285-300
16. Ford, Maria Z. 1995. Power of politeness around the world. Dialog on Language Instruction 11(1): 1-12
17. Gardner-Chloros, Penelope. 1991. Ni tu ni vous: Principes et paradoxes dans l'emploi des pronoms d'allocution en français contemporain. Journal of French Language Studies 1: 139-155
18. Gonçalves Matos, Ana. 2005. Literary texts: A passage to intercultural reading in foreign language education. Language and Intercultural Communication 5 (1): 57-71
19. Grimaud, Michel. 1989. Les appellatifs dans le discours. Madame, Mademoiselle, Monsieur avec et sans nom propre. Le Français Moderne 57 (1): 54-78
20. Kasper, Gabriele, and Kenneth R. Rose. 1999. Pragmatics and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 19: 81-104
21. Kecskes, Istvan. 2004. Lexical merging, conceptual blending, and cultural crossing. Intercultural Pragmatics 1: 1-26
22. Kinginger, Celeste, and Julie A. BeIz. 2005. Socio-cultural perspectives of pragmatic development in foreign language learning. Intercidtural Pragmatics 2: 369-421
23. Kinginger, Celeste, and Kathleen Farrell. 2004. Assessing development of metapragmatic awareness in study abroad. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad 10 (2): 19-42
24. Kramsch, Claire, and Thomas Nolden. 1994. Redefining literacy in a foreign language. Die Unterrichtspraxis 27 (1): 28-35
25. Liddicoat, Anthony J. 2002. Static and dynamic views of culture and intercultural language acquisition. Babel 36 (3): 4-11, 37
26. Liddicoat, Anthony J., and Chantal Crozet. 2001. Acquiring French interactional norms through instruction. In Kenneth R. Rose and Gabriele Kasper (eds.), Pragmatic Development in Instructional Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 125-144
27. Liddicoat, Anthony J., Leo Papademetre, Angela Scarino, and Michelle Kohler. 2003. Report on Intercidtural Language Learning. Canberra: DEST
28. Lyster, Roy. 1994. The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students' sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics 15: 263-287
29. -. 1996. Question forms, conditionals, and second-person pronouns used by adolescent native speakers across two levels of formality in written and spoken French. Modern Language Journal 80: 165-180
30. Lyster, Roy, and Jacques Rebuffot. 2002. Acquisition des pronoms d'allocution en classe de français immersif. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 17: 51-72
31. Magnan, Sally Sieloff, Laurey Martin-Berg, William J. Berg, and Yvonne Rochette Ozello. 2002. Paroles (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons
32. Maurer, Louise, Piera Carroli, and Roger Hillman. 2000. Teaching literature across cultures and across artforms. In Anthony J. Liddicoat and Chantai Crozet (eds.), Teaching Languages, Teaching Cultures. Melbourne: Language Australia. 89-104
33. Morford, Janet. 1997. Social indexicality in French pronominal address. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7 (1): 3-37
34. Mühlhäusler, Peter, and Rom Harré. 1990. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Blackwell
35. Peeters, Bert. 2004. Tu ou vous? Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur 114 (1): 1-17
36. Rose, Kenneth R., and Gabriele Kasper (eds.). 2001. Pragmatic Development in Instructional Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
37. Terrell, Tracy D., Mary B. Rogers, Betsy J. Kerr, and Guy Spielmann. 2005. Deux Mondes: A Communicative Approach (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill
38. Valette, Jean-Paul, and Rebecca M. Valette. 1993. Contacts (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin
39. Vincent, Diane. 2001. Remarques sur le tutoiement et le vouvoiement en français parlé au Québec. In Actes du colloque "La Journée du Québec." Copenhagen: Institut d'Etudes Romanes, Copenhagen University. 11-22