Vousor tu? Native and non-native speakers of French on a sociolinguistic tightrope

IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 383-402

  Dewaele, Jean Marc ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248692184     PISSN: 0019042X     EISSN: 16134141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/iral.2004.42.4.383     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bartning, Inge (1997). L'apprenant dit avancé et son acquisition d'une langue étrangère: tour d'horizon et esquisse d'une caractérisation de la variété avancée. AILE Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 9: 9–50.
2. Belz, Julie A. and Celeste Kinginger (2002). The cross-linguistic development of address form use in telecollaborative language learning: Two case studies. Canadian Modern Language Review 59 (2): 189–214.
3. Belz, Julie A. and Celeste Kinginger (2003). Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms. Language Learning 53 (4): 591–647.
4. De Angelis, Gessica (2002). Interlanguage influence and multilingualism: An empirical investigation into typologically similar and dissimilar languages. Ph.D. diss., School of Languages, Linguistics and Culture, Birkbeck College, University of London.
5. Dewaele, Jean-Marc (1993). Variation synchronique en interlangue française. Ph.D. diss., Department of French, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
6. Dewaele, Jean-Marc (2002). Using sociostylistic variants in advanced French IL: The case of nous/on. In EU-ROSLA Yearbook 2, Susan Foster-Cohen, Tanya Ruthenberg, Marie Louise Poschen (eds.), 205–226. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.
7. Dewaele, Jean-Marc (2002). Variation, chaos et système en interlangue française. AILE Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 17: 143–167.
8. Dewaele, Jean-Marc and Vera Regan (2002). Maîtriser la norme sociolinguistique en interlangue française: le cas de l'omission variable de ‘ne’. Journal of French Language Studies 12: 123-148.
9. Dörnyei, Zoltan (2003). Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Ervin-Tripp, Susan (1972). Sociolinguistic rules of address. In Sociolinguistics, John Bernard Pride and Janet Holmes (eds.), 225–240. Penguin: Harmondsworth, Middlesex.
11. Gardner-Chloros, Penelope (1991). Ni tu ni vous: principes et paradoxes dans l'emploi des pro-noms d'allocution en français contemporain. Journal of French Language Studies 1: 139–155.
12. Gleick, James (1987). Chaos. Making a New Science. Penguin: New York.
13. Harpman, Jacqueline (2001). Dieu et moi. Paris: Editions Mille et une nuit.
14. Herdina, Philippe and Ulrike Jessner (2002). A Dynamic Model of Multilingualism. Perspectives of Change in Psycholinguistics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
15. Hughson, Jo-Anne (to appear). Le tu et le vous: étude sociolinguistique dans la banlieue parisienne. Franco-British Studies 33.
16. Keshavarz, Mohammad Hossein (2001). The role of social context, intimacy, and distance in the choice of forms of address. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 148: 5–8.
17. Kinginger, Celeste (2000). Learning the pragmatics of solidarity in the networked foreign language classroom. In Second and Foreign Language Through Classroom Interaction, Joan Kelly Hall and Lorrie Stoops Verplaetse (eds.), 23–46. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Lambert, Wallace and Richard Tucker (1976). Tu, Vous, Usted: A Social-psychological Study of Address Patterns. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
19. Lantolf, Jim and Aneta Pavlenko (2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity Theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In Learner Contributions to Language Learning: New Directions in Research, Michael Breen (ed.), 141–158. London: Longman.
20. Larsen-Freeman, Diane (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 18: 141–165.
21. Lyster, Roy (1994). The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students' sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics 15: 263–287.
22. Lyster, Roy and Jacques Rebuffot (2002). Acquisition des pronoms d'allocution en classe de français immersif. AILE Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 17: 51–72.
23. Morford, Janet (1997). Social indexicality in French pronominal address. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7: 3–37.
24. Mougeon, Raymond, Terry Nadasdi, and Katherine Rehner (2002). État de la recherche sur l'appro-priation de la variation par les apprenants avancés du FL2 ou FLE. AILE Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 17: 7–50.
25. Mühlhäusler, Peter and Rom Harré (1990). Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
26. Planchenault, Gaelle (in progress). The use of film sequences in the French classroom: A study on teaching and acquisition of sociocultural and sociopragmatic competences. Ph.D. diss., School of Languages, Linguistics and Culture, Birkbeck College, University of London.
27. Regan, Vera (1995). The acquisition of sociolinguistic native speech norms: Effects of a year abroad on second language learners of French. In Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context, Barbara F. Freed (ed.), 245–267. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
28. Rehner, Katherine, Raymond Mougeon, and Terry Nadasdi (2003). The learning of sociolinguistic variation by advanced FSL learners: The case of nous versus on in immersion French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25: 127–156.
29. Sax, Kelly (2003). Acquisition of stylistic variation in American learners of French. Ph.D. diss., Department of French and Italian, Indiana University.
30. Schoch, Marianne (1978). Problème sociolinguistique des pronoms d'allocution: “tu” et “vous” enquête à Lausanne. La Linguistique: Revue de la Société Internationale de Linguistique Fonctionnelle 14: 55–73.
31. Tarone, Elaine and Merrill Swain (1995). A sociolinguistic perspective on second language use in immersion classrooms. Modern Language Journal 79: 166–178.
32. Vincent, Diane (2001). Remarques sur le tutoiement et le vouvoiement en français parlé au Québec. In Actes du Colloque “La Journée du Québec”, 11–22. Copenhagen: Institut d'Etudes Romanes, University of Copenhagen.
33. Ullman, Michael T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4 (1): 105–122.
34. Wolfson, Nessa (1989). Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
35. Young, Richard (1999). Sociolinguistic approaches to SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 19: 105–32.