Signs and phylogeny: A semiotic approach to systematics

Semiotica

Volumn 149, Issue , 2004, Pages 125-159

  Vogt, Lars ^a  

^a Institut fur Biologie   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248692668     PISSN: 00371998     EISSN: 16133692     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/semi.2004.022     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Allard, M. W. and Carpenter, J. M. (1996). On weighting and congruence. Cladistics 12, 183-198
2. Bock, W. J. (1973). Philosophical foundations of classical evolutionary classification. Systematic Zoology 22, 375-392
3. Brauckmann, S. (1999). On genes, cells, and memory. Semiotica 127, 151-167
4. Brier, S. (1999). Biosemiotics and the foundation of cybersemiotics: Reconceptualizing the insights of ethology, second-order cybernetics, and Peirce's semiotics in biosemiotics to create a non-Cartesian information science. Semiotica 127, 169-198
5. Brogaard, B. O. (1999). An Aristotelian approach to animal behavior. Semiotica 127, 199-213
6. Brower, A. V. Z. (2000). Evolution is not a necessary assumption of cladistics. Cladistics 16, 143-154
7. Bryant, H. N. (1989). An evaluation of cladistic and character analyses as hypotheticodeductive procedures, and the consequences for character weighting. Systematic Zoology 38, 214-227
8. Chippindale, P. T. and Wiens, J. J. (1994). Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 43, 278-287
9. Cicero, M. T. (1995). De re publica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
10. Defoe, D. (1719). The Life and Strange and Surprising Adventures of Robinson Crusoe, R. West (ed.). New York: Carroll & Graf
11. Deledalle, G. (2000). Semiotik als Philosophie. In Die Welt als Zeichen und Hypothese, U. Wirth (ed.), 31-43. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
12. de Pinna, M. C. C. (1991). Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics 7, 367-394
13. de Queiroz, K. and Poe, S. (2001). Philosophy and phylogenetic inference: A comparison of likelihood and parsimony methods in the context of Karl Popper's writings on corroboration. Systematic Biology 50, 305-321
14. Eco, U. (2000). Kant und das Schnabeltier. München: Carl Hanser Verlag
15. Emmeche, C. (1991). A semiotic reflection on biology, living signs, and artificial life. Biology and Philosophy 6, 325-340
16. Faith, D. P. and Trueman, J. W. H. (2001). Towards an inclusive philosophy for phylogenetic inference. Systematic Biology 50 (3), 331-350
17. Farris, J. S. (1969). A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Systematic Zoology 18, 374-385
18. -(1970). Methods for computing Wagner trees. Systematic Zoology 19, 83-92
19. -(2000). Corroboration versus 'strongest evidence'. Cladistics 16, 385-393
20. Goloboff, P. A. (1993). Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics 9, 83-91
21. Haszprunar, G. (1998). Parsimony analysis as a specific kind of homology estimation and the implications for character weighting. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9, 333-339
22. Hoffmeyer, J. (1998). Biosemiotics - The study of living systems from a semiotic perspective. In Encyclopedia of Semiotics, P. Bouissac (ed.), 82-85. New York: Oxford University Press
23. Kant, I. (1998). Kritik der reinen Vernunft, J. Timmermann (ed.). Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag GmbH
24. Kawade, Y. (1999). The two foci of biology: Matter and sign. Semiotica 127, 369-384
25. Kluge, A. G. (1997a). Testability and the refutation and corroboration of cladistic hypotheses. Cladistics 13, 81-96
26. -(1997b). Sophisticated falsification and research cycles: Consequences for differential character weighting in phylogenetic systematics. Zoologica Scripta 26, 349-360
27. -(2001). Philosophical conjectures and their refutation. Systematic Biology 50, 322-330
28. Kull, K. (2000). Organisms can be proud to have been their own designers. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 7, 45-55
29. Laubichler, M. D. (1999). A semiotic perspective on biological objects and biological functions. Semiotica 127, 415-431
30. Mackie, J. L. (1974). The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press
31. Mackie, J. L. (1985). Logic and Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press
32. May, M. (1999). Kausales Schliessen. Eine Untersuchung über kausale Erklärungen und Theorienbildung. Doctoral dissertation, Graduiertenkolleg Kognitionswissenschaft Universität Hamburg, Bericht Nr. 64
33. Mahner, M. and Bunge, M. (1997). Foundations of Biophilosophy. Berlin: Springer
34. Milinkovitch, M. C.; LeDuc, R. G.; Adachi, J.; Farnir, F.; Georges, M.; and Hasegawa, M. (1996). Effects of character weighting and species sampling on phylogeny reconstruction: A case study based on DNA sequence data in cetaceans. Genetics 144, 1817-1833
35. Neff, N. A. (1986). A rational basis for a priori character weighting. Systematic Zoology 35, 110-123
36. Oehler, K. (2000). Einführung in den semiotischen Pragmatismus. In Die Welt als Zeichen und Hypothese, U. Wirth (ed.), 13-30. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
37. Pape, H. (1991). Einleitung. In Naturordnung und Zeichenprozeß, H. Pape (ed.), 11-109. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
38. -(2000a). Einleitung. In Charles S. Peirce. Semiotische Schriften Band 1, H. Pape and J. W. Kloesel (eds.), 7-79. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
39. -(2000b). Einleitung. In Charles S. Peirce. Semiotische Schriften Band 2, H. Pape and J. W. Kloesel (eds.), 7-83. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
40. Patterson, C. (1988). Homology in classical and molecular biology. Molecular Biology and Evolution 5, 603-625
41. Peirce, C. S. (1865). Erste Harvard-Vorlesung. In Charles S. Peirce. Semiotische Schriften Band 1, H. Pape and J. W. Kloesel (eds.), 87-104. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
42. -(1866a). The logic of science; or, induction and hypothesis (Lowell Lecture X). In Writings of Charles S. Peirce, Vol. 1, E. C. Moore, M. H. Fisch, C. J. W. Kloesel, D. D. Roberts, L. A. Ziegler, and N. P. Atkinson (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press
43. -(1866b). Neunte Lowell-Vorlesung. In Charles S. Peirce. Semiotische Schriften Band 1, H. Pape and J. W. Kloesel (eds.), 107-127. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
44. -(1867). Eine neue Liste der Kategorien. In Charles S. Peirce. Semiotische Schriften Band 1, H. Pape and J. W. Kloesel (eds.), 147-159. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
45. -(1893). Die Kunst des Räsonierens. In Charles S. Peirce. Semiotische Schriften Band 1, H. Pape and J. W. Kloesel (eds.), 191-201. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
46. -(1895). Kurze Logik. In Charles S. Peirce. Semiotische Schriften Band 1, H. Pape and J. W. Kloesel (eds.), 202-229. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
47. -(1897). Die Logik der Relative. In Charles S. Peirce. Semiotische Schriften Band 1. H. Pape and J. W. Kloesel (eds.), 269-335. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
48. (Translation of Logic of relatives, The Monist, vol. 7, 161-217.)
49. -(1898). Grundbegriffe der Semiotik und formalen Logik. In Charles S. Peirce. Semiotische Schriften Band 1, H. Pape and J. W. Kloesel (eds.), 336-375. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
50. -(1901). Minutiöse Logik. In Charles S. Peirce. Semiotische Schriften Band 1, H. Pape and J. W. Kloesel (eds.), 377-408. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
51. -(1903a). Syllabus of certain topics of logic. In Charles S. Peirce. Phänomen und Logik der Zeichen, H. Pape (ed.), 37-183. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
52. -(1903b). Lowell-Lecture. Teil 1 des 3. Entwurfs der Dritten Vorlesung. In Charles S. Peirce. Semiotische Schriften Band 2, H. Pape and J. W. Kloesel (eds.), 127-145. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
53. -(1904). Neue Elemente. In Naturordnung und Zeichenprozeß, H. Pape (ed.), 339-377. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
54. -(1905). 2. Entwurf zum Aufsatz: Die Grundlagen des Pragmatizismus. In Charles S. Peirce. Semiotische Schriften Band 2, H. Pape and J. W. Kloesel (eds.), 308-353. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
55. Platnick, N. I. and Gaffney, E. S. (1977). Systematics: A Popperian perspective. Systematic Zoology 26, 360-365
56. Riedl, R. (2000). Strukturen der Komplexität. Berlin: Springer
57. Roesler, A. (2000). Vermittelte Unmittelbarkeit. Aspekte einer Semiotik der Wahrnehmung bei Charles S. Peirce. In Die Welt als Zeichen und Hypothese, U. Wirth (eds.), 112-129. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
58. Sebeok, T. A. (1990). Indexicality. The American Journal for Semiotics 7 (4), 7-28
59. Spohn, W.; Ledwig, M.; and Esfeld, M. (2001). Current Issues in Causation. Paderborn: Mentis
60. Stjernfelt, F. (1999). Biosemiotics and formal ontology. Semiotica 127, 537-565
61. Trueman, J. W. H. (1998). Reverse successive weighting. Systematic Biology 47, 733-737
62. Vogt, L. (2002). Testing and weighting characters. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 2 (4), 319-333
63. von Pückler, T. (2002). Peirce und Popper über Hypothesen und ihre Bildung. Available at http://www.rz.uni-frankfurt.de/wirth/texte/ Pückler.html
64. von Uexküll, T. (1999). The relationship between semiotics and mechanical models of explanation in the life sciences. Semiotica 127, 647-655
65. Wagner, G. P. (1986). The systems approach: An interface between development and population genetic aspects of evolution. In Patterns and Processes in the History of Life, D. M. Raup and D. Jablonski (eds.), 149-165. Berlin: Springer
66. Wiens, J. J. (2001). Character analysis in morphological phylogenetics: Problems and solutions. Systematic Biology 50, 689-699
67. Zeidler, K. W. (2000). Prolegomena zur Wissenschaftstheorie, Würzburg: Verlag Königshausen & Neumann GmbH