Parsimony Analysis as a Specific Kind of Homology Estimation and the Implications for Character Weighting

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 333-339

  Haszprunar, Gerhard ^a  

^a ZOOLOGISCHE STAATSSAMMLUNG MÜNCHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 0032085696     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0496     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Allard M. W., Carpenter J. M. On weighting and congruence. Cladistics. 12:1996;183-198.
2. Ax P. Multicellular Animals. I. A New Approach to the Phylogenetic Order in Nature. 1996;Springer, New York.
3. Bardele C. F. On the symbiotic origin of protists, their diversity, and their privotal role in teaching systematic biology. Ital. J. Zool. 64:1997;107-113.
4. Bock W. J. The homology concept: Its philosophical foundation and practical methodology. Zool. Beiträge N.F. 32:1989;327-353.
5. Boyden A. Homology and analogy: A century after the definition of "homologue" and "analogue" of Richard Owen. Quart. J. Rev. Biol. 18:1943;228-241.
6. Bremer K., Wanntrop E. Hierarchy and reticulation in systematics. Syst. Zool. 28:1979;624-627.
7. Brower A. V. Z., Schawaroch V. Three steps of homology assessment. Cladistics. 12:1996;265-272.
8. Bryant H. N. An evaluation of cladistic and character analyses as hypothetico-deductive procedures, and the consequences for character weighting. Syst. Zool. 38:1989;214-227.
9. Bullini L., Nascetti G. Speciation by hybridization in phasmids and other insects. Can. J. Zool. 68:1990;1747-1760.
10. Cavalier-Smith T. The number of symbiotic origins of organelles. BioSystems. 28:1992;91-106.
11. Corliss J. O. Symposium: Endosymbionts of Protozoa. Zool. Sci. 7:1990;167-178.
12. Cracraft J. [Review of] Molecules and morphology in evolution: conflict or compromise. Cladistics. 5:1989;202-211.
13. Cummings M. P. Transmission patterns of eukaryotic transposeable elements - arguments for and against horizontal transfer. TREE. 9:1994;141-145.
14. DePinna M. C. C. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics. 7:1991;367-394.
15. Ehrendorfer F. Artbegriff und Artbildung in botanischer Sicht. Z. Zool. Syst. Evolutionsforsch. 22:1984;234-263.
16. Farris J. S. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. Advances in Cladistics. 1983;Columbia Univ. Press, New York. p. 7-36.
17. Felsenstein J. Cases in which parimony or compatibility methods can be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:1978;401-410.
18. Funk V. A. Phylogenetic pattern and hybridization. Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden. 72:1985;681-715.
19. Gardner J. P. A. Hybridization in the sea. Adv. Mar. Biol. 31:1997;1-78.
20. Hall B. K. Homology and embryonic development. Evol. Biol. 28:1995;1-37.
21. Haszprunar G. The types of homology and their significance for evolutionary biology and phylogenetics. J. Evol. Biol. 5:1992;13-24.
22. Hennig W. Phylogenetic Systematics. 1966;Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana.
23. Hilaro E., Gogarten J. P. Horizontal transfer of ATPase genes - the tree of life becomes a net of life. BioSystems. 31:1993;111-119.
24. Hillis D. M. Homology in molecular biology. Hall B. K. Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. 1994;339-368 Academic Press, New York.
25. Hoelzer G. A., Melnick D. J. Patterns of speciation and limits to phylogenetic resolution. TREE. 9:1994;104-107.
26. Khakhina L. Evolutionary significance of symbiosis: Development of the symbiogenesis concept. Symbiosis. 14:1993;217-228.
27. Kaplan D. R. The concept of homology and its central role in the elucidation of plant systematic relationships. Duncan T., Stuessy T. Cladistics: Perspectives on the Reconstruction of Evolutionary History. 1984;51-70 Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
28. Kluge A. G. Testability and the refutation and corroboration of cladistic hypothesis. Cladistics. 13:1997;81-96.
29. Mayr E. Principles of Zoological Systematics. 1969;McGraw-Hill, New York.
30. McDade L. Hybrids and phylogenetic systematics. I. Patterns of character expression in hybrids and their implication for cladistic analysis. Evolution. 44:1990;1685-1700.
31. McDade L. Hybrids and phylogenetic systematics. II. The impact of hybrids on cladistic analysis. Evolution. 46:1992;1329-1346.
32. Milinkovitch M. C., LeDuc R. G., Adachi J., Farnir F., Georges M., Hasegawa M. Effects of character weighting and species sampling on phylogeny reconstruction: A case study based on DNA sequence data in cetaceans. Genetics. 144:1996;1817-1833.
33. Moens L., VanFleteren J., Van de Peer Y., Peeters K., Kapp O. Globins in nonvertebrate species: Dispersal by horizontal gene transfer and evolution of the structure-functional relationships. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1996;324-333.
34. Moore J., Willmer P. Convergent evolution in envertebrates. Biol. Rev. 72:1997;1-60.
35. Morris P., Cobabe E. Cuvier meets Watson and Crick - The utility of molecules as classical homologies. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 44:1991;307-324.
36. Neff N. A. A rational basis fora priori. Syst. Zool. 35:1986;111-123.
37. Nelson G. J. Reticulations in cladograms. Platnick N. I., Funk V. A. Advances in Cladistics. 1983;106-111 Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
38. Nelson G. J. Homology and systematics. Hall B. K. Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. 1994;101-149 Academic Press, New York.
39. Nilsson D.-E. Eye-ancestry: Old genes for new eyes. Curr. Biol. 6:1996;39-42.
40. Panchen A. L. Classification, Evolution and the Nature of Biology. 1992;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
41. Patterson C. Morphological characters and homology. Joysey K. A., Friday A. E. Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction. 1982;21-74 Academic Press, London/New York.
42. Patterson C. Homology in classical and molecular biology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:1988;603-625.
43. Ponder W. F., Lindberg D. L. Towards a phylogeny of gastropod molluscs: An analysis using morphological data. Zool. J. Linnean Soc. 119:1997;83-265.
44. Remane A. Die Grundlagen des natürlichen Systems, der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. 1952;Akad. Verlagsges, Geest & Portig, Leipzig.
45. Remane A. Morphologie als Homologienforschung. Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 1954:1954;159-183.
46. Remane J. Die Entwicklung des Homologie-Begriffs seit Adolf Remane. Zool. Beiträge N.F. 32:1989;497-503.
47. Rieger R. M., Tyler S. The homology theorem in ultrastructure research. Am. Zool. 19:1979;655-664.
48. Rieger R. M., Tyler S. Das Homologietheorem in der Ultrastrukturforschung. Ott J. A., Wagner G. P., Wuketits F. M. Evolution, Ordnung und Erkenntnis. 1985;21-36 Parey Verlag, Berlin/Hamburg.
49. Rieppel O. Fundamentals of Comparative Biology. 1988;Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel/Boston.
50. Rieppel O. Homology, topology, and typology: The history of modern debates. Hall B. K. Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. 1994;63-100 Academic Press, New York.
51. Ruppert E. E. Homology recognition as a basis for comparative biology. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on the Tardigrada. 1982;East Tennessee State Univ. Press. p. 31-54.
52. Shubin N., Tabin C., Carroll S. Fossils, genes and the evolution of animals limbs. Nature. 388:1997;639-648.
53. Sitte P. Phylogenetische Aspekte der Zellevolution. Biol. Rundschau. 28:1990;1-18.
54. Skála Z., Zrzavy J. Phylogenetic reticulations and cladistics: Discussion of methodological concepts. Cladistics. 10:1995;305-313.
55. Sluys R. The notion of homology in current comparative biology. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 34:1996;145-152.
56. Syvanen M. Horizontal gene transfer: Evidence and possible consequences. Annu. Rev. Genet. 28:1994;237-261.
57. Tyler S. The role of function in determination of homology and convergence - Examples from invertebrate adhesive organs. Fortschr. Zool. 36:1988;331-347.
58. Wägele J.-W. Review of methodological problems of 'computer cladistics' examplified with a case study on isopod phylogeny (Crustacea: Isopoda). Z. Zool. Syst. Evolutionsforsch. 32:1994;81-107.
59. Wagner W. H. Reticulistics: The recognition of hybrids and their role in cladistics and classifications. Platnick N. I., Funk V. A. Advances in Cladistics. 1983;63-79 Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
60. Westheide W., Rieger R. M. Systematics of the amphi-atlanticMicrophthalmus-listensis. Z. Zool. Syst. Evolutionsforsch. 25:1987;12-39.
61. Winnepenninckx B., Backeljau T. 18S rRNA alignments derived from different secondary structure models can produce alternative phylogenies. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 34:1996;135-143.
62. Wiley E. O. Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Procedures. 1981;Wiley, New York/Chichester.
63. Zeyl C., Bell G. Symbiotic DNA in eukaryotic genomes. TREE. 11:1996;10-15.