Corroboration versus "strongest evidence"

Cladistics

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 385-393

  Farris, James S ^a  

^a SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS;

EID: 0034465971     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/clad.2000.0142     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. A randomization test for phylogenetic information in systematic data
2. PTP is meaningless, T-PTP is contradictory: A reply to Trueman
3. Relative symmetry of cladograms and phenograms: An experimental study
4. On corroboration: A reply to Carpenter
5. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis
6. On the boundaries of phylogenetic systematics
7. Conjectures and refutations
8. Likelihood and inconsistency
9. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining
10. Asymmetry and explanations
11. A botanical clique
12. Parsimony, synapomorphy, and explanatory power: A reply to Duncan
13. Synapomorphy, parsimony, and evidence
14. Parsimony and history
15. A likelihood approach to character weighting and what it tells us about parsimony and compatibility
16. Estimating character weights during tree search
17. Skewness and permutation
18. Methodological problems in green plant phylogeny
19. Homoplasy increases phylogenetic structure
20. Testability and the refutation and corroboration of cladistic hypotheses
21. A method of selection of characters in numerical taxonomy
22. Strongest evidence: Maximum apparent phylogenetic signal as a new cladistic optimality criterion
23. Strongest evidence in compatibility: Clique and tree evaluation using apparent phylogenetic signal
24. Long branch abstractions
25. Links between maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony under a simple model of site substitution