On the phylogeny of the Drosophila hydei subgroup: New insights from combined analyses of nuclear and mitochondrial data

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 1198-1205

  Morán, Tomás ^a   Fontdevila, Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; XANTHINE DEHYDROGENASE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; DROSOPHILA; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; DROSOPHILA; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; XANTHINE DEHYDROGENASE;

DROSOPHILA HYDEI; HYDEI SUBGROUP;

EID: 34248652120     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.12.021     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Baker R.H., and DeSalle R. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst. Biol. 46 4 (1997) 654-673
2. Bock I.R. Interspecific hybridization in the genus Drosophila. Evol. Biol. 18 (1984) 41-70
3. Bremer K. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42 4 (1988) 795-803
4. Bremer K. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10 3 (1994) 295-304
5. Creer S., Malhotra A., and Thorpe R.S. Assessing the phylogenetic utility of four mitochondrial genes and a nuclear intron in the asian pit viper genus, Trimeresurus: separate, simultaneous, and conditional data combination analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20 8 (2003) 1240-1251
6. Cunningham C.W., Zhu H., and Hillis D.M. Best-fit maximum-likelihood models for phylogenetic inference: empirical tests with known phylogenies. Evolution 52 4 (1998) 978-987
7. Després L., Gielly L., Redoutet B., and Tabarlet P. Using AFLP to resolve phylogenetic relationships in a morphologically diversified plant species complex when nuclear and chloroplast sequences fail to reveal variability. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 27 2 (2003) 185-196
8. Dobzhansky Th., and Sturtevant A.H. Inversions in the chromosomes of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 23 1 (1938) 28-64
9. Durando C.M., Baker R.H., Etges W.J., Heed W.B., Wasserman M., and DeSalle R. Phylogenetic analysis of the repleta species group of the genus Drosophila using multiple sources of characters. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 16 2 (2000) 296-307
10. Farris J.S., Källersjö M., Kluge A.G., and Bult C. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10 3 (1994) 315-319
11. Farris J.S., Källersjö M., Kluge A.G., and Bult C. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44 4 (1995) 570-572
12. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17 6 (1981) 368-376
13. Felsenstein, J. 2001. PHYLIP: Phylogeny Inference Package. Version 3.6a2 Distributed by the author, Departament of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
14. Goto S.G., and Kimura M.T. Phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial COI and nuclear Gpdh genes in Drosophila. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18 3 (2001) 404-422
15. Gregg T.G. Crossing over and nondisjunction in interspecific hybrids between Drosophila hydei and neohydei. Genetics 88 (1978) s33-s34
16. Hall T.A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser. 41 (1999) 95-98
17. Huelsenbeck J.P., and Crandall K.A. Phylogeny estimation and hypothesis testing using maximum likelihood. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28 (1997) 437-466
18. Koopman W.J.M., Zevenbergen M.J., and Vander Berg R.G. Species relationships in Lactuca s.l. (Lactuceae, Asteraceae) inferred from AFLP fingerprints. Am. J. Bot. 88 10 (2001) 1881-1887
19. Miyamoto M.M., and Fitch W.M. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44 1 (1995) 64-76
20. Morán T., and Fontdevila A. Phylogeny and molecular evolution of the Drosophila hydei subgroup (Drosophila repleta group) inferred from the Xanthine dehydrogenase gene. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 36 3 (2005) 695-705
21. O'Grady P.M., Baker R.H., Durando C.M., Etges W.J., and DeSalle R. Polytene chromosomes as indicators of phylogeny in several species groups of Drosophila. BMC. Evol. Biol. 1 (2001) 6. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/1/6 [www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/1/6]
22. Pamilo P., and Nei M. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5 5 (1988) 568-583
23. Patterson J.T., and Stone W.S. Evolution in the Genus Drosophila (1952), Macmillan, New York
24. Pelser P.B., Gravendeel B., and van der Meijden R. Phylogeny reconstruction in the gap between too little and too much divergence: the closest relatives of Senecio jacobaea (Asteraceae) according to DNA sequences and AFLPs. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 29 3 (2003) 613-628
25. Piñol J., Francino O., Fontdevila A., and Cabré O. Rapid isolation of Drosophila high molecular weight DNA to obtain genomic libraries. Nucleic Acids Res. 16 6 (1988) 27-36
26. Rafael V., and Arcos G. Drosophila guayllabambae n. sp., un nuevo miembro del grupo repleta, subgrupo hydei (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Evolución Biológica 2 (1988) 167-176
27. Rafael V., and Arcos G. Subgrupo inca, un nuevo subgrupo del grupo repleta, con descripción de Drosophila huancavilcae n.sp (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Evolución Biológica 3 (1989) 233-243
28. Robe L.J., Valente V.L., Budnik M., and Loreto E.L. Molecular phylogeny of the subgenus Drosophila (Diptera, Drosophilidae) with an emphasis on Neotropical species and groups: A nuclear versus mitochondrial gene approach. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 36 3 (2005) 623-640
29. Rodríguez - Trelles F., Alarcón L., and Fontdevila A. Molecular evolution and phylogeny of the buzzatii complex (Drosophila repleta group): a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17 7 (2000) 1112-1122
30. Russo C.A., Takezaki N., and Nei M. Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of Drosophilid species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12 3 (1995) 391-404
31. Rzhetsky A., and Nei M. Test of applicability of several substitution models for DNA sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12 1 (1995) 131-151
32. Schäfer U. Hybrid breakdown in Drosophila hydei x D. neohydei hybrids. Genetics 83 (1976) s67-s68
33. Sorenson, M.D. 1999. TreeRot, version 2. Boston University, Boston, MA. [http://people.bu.edu/msoren/TreeRot.html].
34. Spicer G.S. Phylogenetic utility of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase gene: molecular evolution of the Drosophila buzzatii species complex. J. Mol. Evol. 41 6 (1995) 749-759
35. Spicer G.S., and Pitnick S. Molecular systematics of the Drosophila hydei subgroup as inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 43 3 (1996) 281-286
36. Strimmer K., and von Haeseler A. Quartet puzzling: a quartet maximum-likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13 7 (1996) 964-969
37. *: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b2. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
38. Tamura K. The rate and pattern of nucleotide substitution in Drosophila mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9 5 (1992) 814-825
39. Tatarenkov A., and Ayala F.J. Phylogenetic relationships among species groups of the virilis-repleta radiation of Drosophila. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 21 2 (2001) 327-331
40. Tavaré S. Some probabilistic and statistical problems on the analysis of DNA sequences. In: Muir R.M. (Ed). Lectures in mathematics in the life sciences (1986), American Mathematical Society, Providence, USA 57-86
41. Ting C.T., Tsaur S.C., and Wu C.I. The phylogeny of closely related species as revealed by the genealogy of a speciation gene, Odysseus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 10 (2000) 5313-5316
42. Vilela C.R. A revision of the Drosophila repleta species group (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Rev. Bras. Ent. 27 1 (1983) 1-114
43. Wasserman M. Cytological studies of the repleta group of the genus Drosophila. IV. The hydei subgroup. Univ. Texas Publ. 6205 (1962) 73-84
44. Wasserman M. Cytological evolution in the Drosophila repleta species group. In: Barker J.S.F., and Starmer W.T. (Eds). Ecological Genetics and Evolution (1982), Academic Press, New York, USA 49-64
45. Wasserman M. Cytological evolution of the Drosophila repleta species group. In: Krimbas C.B., and Powell J.R. (Eds). Drosophila Inversion Polymorphism (1992), CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA 455-552
46. Wharton L.T. Interspecific hybridization in the repleta group. Univ. Texas Pub. 4445 (1944) 175-193
47. Wheeler M.R. Taxonomic studies on the Drosophilidae. Univ. Texas Pub. 4920 (1949) 157-195
48. Yang Z. Maximum-Likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data. J. Mol. Evol. 42 5 (1996) 587-596
49. Yang Z. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13 5 (1997) 555-556. http://abacus.gene.ucl.ac.uk/software/paml.html [http://abacus.gene.ucl.ac.uk/software/paml.html]