Time-resolved, 3-dimensional magnetic resonance flow analysis at 3 T: Visualization of normal and pathological aortic vascular hemodynamics

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 9-15

  Frydrychowicz, Alex ^a   Harloff, Andreas ^a   Jung, Bernd ^a   Zaitsev, Maxim ^a   Weigang, Ernst ^a   Bley, Thorsten A ^a   Langer, Mathias ^a   Hennig, Jürgen ^a   Markl, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aorta; Magnetic resonance imaging; Phase contrast; Vascular hemodynamics; Velocity mapping

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; BLOOD VESSELS; HEMODYNAMICS; MAGNETISM; RESONANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; VISUALIZATION;

3-DIMENSIONAL; AORTA; FLOW ANALYSIS; FLOW SENSITIVE; HAEMODYNAMICS; PHASE-CONTRAST; THORACIC AORTA; TIME-RESOLVED; VASCULAR HEMODYNAMIC; VELOCITY MAPPING;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ADULT; AORTA FLOW; AORTA THROMBOSIS; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GEOMETRY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THORACIC AORTA; THORACIC AORTA ANEURYSM; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VOLUNTEER;

EID: 33846597931     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000232918.45158.c9     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Beebe HG. Vascular Imaging: Basic Techniques and Applications. In: Rutherford RB, ed. Vascular Surgery. Philadelphia: Elsiever Saunders, 2005, 6th edition, section IV, 271-390.
2. Underwood SR, Firmin DN, Klipstein RH, et al. Magnetic resonance velocity mapping: clinical application of a new technique. Br Heart J. 1987;57:404-412.
3. Firmin DN, Nayler GL, Kilner PJ, et al. The application of phase shifts in NMR for flow measurement. Magn Reson Med. 1990;14:230-241.
4. Pelc NJ, Herfkens RJ, Shimakawa A, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance flow imaging. Magn Reson Q. 1994;10:125-147.
5. Moran PR. A flow velocity zeugmatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans. Magn Reson Imaging. 1982;1:197-203.
6. Firmin DN, Nayler GL, Klipstein RH, et al. In vivo validation of MR velocity imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1987;11:751-756.
7. Rebergen SA, van der Wall EE, Doornbos J, et al. Magnetic resonance measurement of velocity and flow: technique, validation, and cardiovascular applications. Am Heart J. 1993;126:1439-1456.
8. Frayne R, Steinman DA, Ethier CR, et al. Accuracy of MR phase contrast velocity measurements for unsteady flow. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1995;5:428-431.
9. Lee VS, Spritzer CE, Carroll BA, et al. Flow quantification using fast cine phase-contrast MR imaging, conventional cine phase-contrast MR imaging, and Doppler sonography: in vitro and in vivo validation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:1125-1131.
10. Markl M, Draney MT, Hope MD, et al. Time-resolved 3-dimensional velocity mapping in the thoracic aorta: visualization of 3-directional blood flow patterns in healthy volunteers and patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004;28:459-468.
11. Markl M, Chan FP, Alley MT, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:499-506.
12. Bogren HG, Buonocore MH. Complex flow patterns in the great vessels: a review. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 1999;15:105-113.
13. Mohiaddin RH, Kilner PJ, Rees S, et al. Magnetic resonance volume flow and jet velocity mapping in aortic coarctation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1515-1521.
14. Bogren HG, Mohiaddin RH, Yang GZ, et al. Magnetic resonance velocity vector mapping of blood flow in thoracic aortic aneurysms and grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;110:704-714.
15. Kilner PJ, Yang GZ, Wilkes AJ, et al. Asymmetric redirection of flow through the heart. Nature. 2000;404:759-761.
16. Wigstrom L, Ebbers T, Fyrenius A, et al. Particle trace visualization of intracardiac flow using time-resolved 3D phase contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1999;41:793-799.
17. Wigstrom L, Sjoqvist L, Wranne B. Temporally resolved 3D phase-contrast imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:800-803.
18. Buonocore MH. Visualizing blood flow patterns using streamlines, arrows, and particle paths. Magn Reson Med. 1998;40:210-226.
19. Markl M, Frydrychowicz A, Jung B, et al. Adaptive navigator gated time-resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3T: assessment of normal and pathological vascular anatomy and blood flow. In: Proceedings of the 14th Scientific Meeting, International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Seattle, Washington, 6-12 May 2006. p1905.
20. Walker PG, Cranney GB, Scheidegger MB, et al. Semiautomated method for noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity data. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;3:521-530.
21. Mohiaddin RH, Yang GZ, Kilner PJ. Visualization of flow by vector analysis of multidirectional cine MR velocity mapping. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1994;18:383-392.
22. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA. 1999;282(21):2035-2042.
23. Lotz J, Doker R, Noeske R, et al. In vitro validation of phase-contrast flow measurements at 3 T in comparison to 1.5 T: precision, accuracy, and signal-to-noise ratios. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;21(5):604-610.
24. Fink C, Ley S, Kroeker R, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of the chest: combination of parallel imaging with view sharing (TREAT). Invest Radiol. 2005;40(1):40-48.
25. Blaimer M, Breuer F, Mueller M, et al. SMASH, SENSE, PILS, GRAPPA: how to choose the optimal method. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;15(4):223-236.
26. Oshinski JN, Ku DN, Bohning DE, et al. Effects of acceleration on the accuracy of MR phase velocity measurements. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1992;2(6):665-670.
27. Milewicz DM, Dietz HC, Miller DC. Treatment of aortic disease in patients with Marfan syndrome. Circulation. 2005;111:e150-e157.
28. Dake MD, Miller DC, Mitchell RS, et al. The "first generation" of endovascular stent-grafts for patients with aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;116:689-703. [discussion, 703704].