Domestic audience costs in international relations: An experimental approach

International Organization

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 821-840

  Tomz, Michael ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248576806     PISSN: 00208183     EISSN: 15315088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0020818307070282     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aldrich, John H., Christopher Gelpi, Peter Feaver, Jason Reifler, and Kristin Thompson Sharp. 2006. Foreign Policy and die Electoral Connection. Annual. Review of Political. Science 9:477-502.
2. Aldrich, John H., John L. Sullivan, and Eugene Borgida. 1989. Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates "Waltz Before a Blind Audience?" American Political. Science Review 83 (1):123-41.
3. Baum, Matthew A. 2004. Going Private: Public Opinion, Presidential Rhetoric, and the Domestic Politics of Audience Costs in U.S. Foreign Policy Crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (5):603-31.
4. Brody, Richard A. 1994. Crisis, War, and Public Opinion: The Media and Public Support for the President. In Taken by Storm: The Media, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy in the Gulf War, edited by W. Lance Bennett and David L. Paletz, 210-27. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Broz, J. Lawrence. 2002. Political System Transparency and Monetary Commitment Regimes. International Organization 56 (4):861-87.
6. Canes-Wrone, Brandice, and Scott de Marchi. 2002. Presidential Approval and Legislative Success. Journal of Politics 64 (2):491-509.
7. Desch, Michael C. 2002. Democracy and Victory: Why Regime Type Hardly Matters. International Security 27 (2):5-47.
8. Dorussen, Han, and Jongryn Mo. 2001. Ending Economic Sanctions: Audience Costs and RentSeeking as Commitment Strategies. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (4):395-426.
9. Edwards, George C., Jr. 1997. Aligning Tests with Theory: Presidential Approval as a Source of Influence in Congress. Congress & the Presidency 24 (2): 113-30.
10. Eyerman, Joe, and Robert A. Hart Jr. 1996. An Empirical Test of the Audience Cost Proposition: Democracy Speaks Louder than Words. Journal of Conflict Resolution 40 (4):597-616.
11. Fearon, James D. 1994. Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes. American Political Science Review 88 (3):577-92.
12. Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor. 1996. Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations. International Organization 50 (1):109-39.
13. German, Andrew, John B. Carlin, Hal S. Stern, and Donald B. Rubin. 2004. Bayesian Data Analysis. 2d ed. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
14. Gelpi, Christopher F., and Michael. Griesdorf. 2001. Winners or Losers? Democracies in International Crisis, 1918-94. American Political Science Review 95 (3):633-47.
15. Gelpi, Christopher, Jason Reifler, and Peter Feaver. 2007. Iraq the Vote: Retrospective and Prospective Foreign Policy Judgments on Candidate Choice and Casualty Tolerance. Political Behavior 29 (2):151-74.
16. Gowa, Joanne S. 1.999. Ballots and Bullets: The Elusive Democratic Peace. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
17. Gronke, Paul, Jeffrey Koch, and J. Matthew Wilson. 2003. Follow the Leader? Presidential Approval, Presidential Support, and Representatives' Electoral Fortunes. Journal of Politics 65 (36):785-808.
18. Guisinger, Alexandra, and Alastair Smith. 2002. Honest Threats: The Interaction of Reputation and Political Institutions in International Crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (2):175-200.
19. Herrmann, Richard K., and Vaughn P. Shannon. 2001. Defending International. Norms: The Role of Obligation, Material Interest, and Perception in Decision Making. International Organization 55 (3):621-54.
20. Herrmann, Richard K., Philip E. Tetlock, and Penny S. Visser. 1999. Mass Public Decisions to Go to War: A Cognitive-Interactionist Framework. American Political Science Review 93 (3):553-73.
21. Jensen, Nathan M. 2003. Democratic Governance and Multinational Corporations: Political Regimes and Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment. International Organization 57 (3):587-616.
22. Jones, Daniel M., Stuart A. Bremer, and J. David Singer. 1996. Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science 1.5 (2): 163-213.
23. Krosnick, Jon A., and Donald R. Kinder. 1990. Altering the Foundations of Support for the President Through Priming. American Political Science Review 84 (2):497-512.
24. Leeds, Brett Ashley. 1999. Domestic Political Institutions, Credible Commitments, and International Cooperation. American Journal of Political Science 43 (4):979-1002.
25. Leventoǧlu, Bahar, and Ahmer Tarar. 2005. Prenegotiation Public Commitment in Domestic and International Bargaining. American Political Science Review 99 (3):419-33.
26. Lipson, Charles. 2003. Reliable Partners: How Democracies Have Made a Separate Peace. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
27. Mansfield, Edward D., Helen V. Milner, and B. Peter Rosendorff. 2002. Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control, and International Trade Agreements. International Organization 56 (3): 477-513.
28. Martin, Lisa L. 1993. Credibility, Costs, and Institutions: Cooperation on Economic Sanctions. World Politics 45 (3):406-32.
29. McGillivray, Fiona, and Alastair Smith. 2000. Trust and Cooperation Through Agent-Specific Punishments. International Organization 54 (4):809-24.
30. Partell, Peter J., and Glenn Palmer. 1999. Audience Costs and Interstate Crises: An Empirical Assessment of Fearon's Model of Dispute Outcomes. International Studies Quarterly 43 (2):389-405.
31. Prins, Brandon C. 2003. Institutional Instability and the Credibility of Audience Costs: Political Participation and Interstate Crisis Bargaining, 1816-1992. Journal of Peace Research 40 (1):67-84.
32. Ramsay, Kristopher W. 2004. Politics at the Water's Edge: Crisis Bargaining and Electoral Competition. Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (4):459-86.
33. Schultz, Kenneth A. 1999. Do Democratic Institutions Constrain or Inform? Contrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War. International Organization 53 (2):233-66.
34. _. 2001a. Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. _. 2001b. Looking for Audience Costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (1):32-60.
36. Slantchev, Branislav L. 2006. Politicians, the Media, and Domestic Audience Costs. International Studies Quarterly 50 (2):445-77.
37. Smith, Alastair. 1996. To Intervene or Not to Intervene: A Biased Decision. Journal of Conflict Resolution 40 (1):16-40.
38. _. 1998. International Crises and Domestic Politics. American Political Science Review 92 (3):623-38.
39. Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, Henry Brady, and Norman H. Nie. 1993. Citizen Activity: Who Participates? What Do They Say? American Political Science Review 87 (2):303-18.
40. Walt, Stephen M. 1999. Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies. International Security 23 (4):5-48.
41. Weeks, Jessica. Forthcoming. Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve. International Organization.