Audience costs and interstate crises: An empirical assessment of fearon's model of dispute outcomes

International Studies Quarterly

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 389-405

  Partell, Peter J ^a   Palmer, Glenn ^b  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000888597     PISSN: 00208833     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0020-8833.00125     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ALDRICII.J. H., AND F. D. NEISON (1986) Linear Probability, I^ogit, and Probit Models. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-045. Beverly Hills and London: Sage.
2. nd release. College Park, MD: M. Brecher and J. Wilkenfeld, University of Maryland [producers], 1991. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1992.
3. BUENO DF. MESQUITA, B., AND D. LALMAN (1992) War and Reason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4. BUENODE MESQUITA, B.,J. D. MORROW, AND E. R. ZORICK (1997) Capabilities, Perception, and Escalation. American Political Science Review 91:5-27.
5. DIXON, W. J. (1994) Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict. American Political Science Review 88:14-32.
6. EYERMAN, J., AND R. A. HART, JR. (1996) An Empirical Test of the Audience Cost Proposition: Democracy Speaks Louder Than Words. Journal of Conflict Resolution 40:597-616.
7. FEARON, J. D. (1994) Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation oflnternational Disputes./lmm'raH Political Science Review 88:577-592.
8. GLEDIISCH, K. S., AND M. D. WARD (1996) Double Take: A Re-examination of Democracy and Autocracy in Modern Polities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Peace Science Society (International).
9. GOCHMAN, C., AND Z. MAUZ (1984) Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816-1976: Procedures, Patterns, and Insiglus. Journal of Conflict Resolution 28:585-616.
10. GREENE, W. H. (1993) Econometric Analysis, 2d ed. New York: Macmillan.
11. GURR, T. R., K. JACGERS, AND W. H. MOORE (1989) Polity II: Political Structures and Regime Change, 1800-1986 [Codebook]. Boulder, CO'Center for Comparative Politics [producer]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Researcli [distributor], 1990.
12. JONES, D. M., S. A. BREMER, AND J. D. SINGER (1996) Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15:163-213.
13. KAIIN, H. (1965) On Escalation. New York: Praeger.
14. KING, G. (1989) Unifying Political Methodology: The Uhelihood Theory of Statistical Inference, New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. LEBOW, R. N. (19S1) Betu'een Peace and War: The Nature of International Crises. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16. LENG, R. J. (1993) Interstate Crisis Behavior, 1816-1980: Realism Versus Reciprocity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. MAOZ, Z. (1983) Resolve, Capabilities, and the Outcomes of Interstate Disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 26:195-230.
18. MAOZ, Z., AND N. ABDOLAU (1989) Regime Types and International Conflict, 1816-1976. Journal of Conflict Resolution 33:3-35.
19. MAOZ, Z., AND B. RUSSETT (1993) Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986. American Political Science Review 87:624-638.
20. MORGAN, T. C., AND G. PALMER (1997) ATwo-Good Theory of Foreign Policy: An Application to Dispute Initiation and Reciprocation. International Interactions 22:225-244.
21. MOUSSEAU, M. (1998) Democracy and Compromise in Militarized Interstate Conflicts, 1816-1992. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42:210-230.
22. PARTELL, P. J. (1997a) Escalation at the Outset: An Analysis of Targets' Responses in Militarized Interstate Disputes. International Interactions 23:1-27.
23. PARTELL, P. J. (1997b) Executive Constraints and Success in International Crises. Political Research Quarterly 50:503-528.
24. RAY.J.L. (1993) Wars Between Democracies: Rare or Nonexistent? International Interactions 18:251-276.
25. Rw, J. L. (1995) Democracy and International Conflict: An Evaluation of the Democratic Peace Proposition. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
26. SCHELLING, T. (1960) The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
27. SF.NESE, P. D. (199G) Geographic Proximity and Issue Salience: Their Effects on the Escalation of Militarized Interstate Conflict. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15:133-162.
28. SENESE, P. D. (1997) Between Dispute and War: The Effect of Joint Democracy on Interstate Conflict Escalation. Journal of Politics 59:1-27.
29. SINGER, J. D., S. B. BREMER, AND J. STUCKF.Y (1972) "Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820-1965." In Peace, War, and Numbers, edited by B. Russell, pp. 19-48. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30. SIVERSOX, R. M. (1996) Democracies and War Participation: In Defense of the Institutional Constraints Argument. European Journal of International Relations 1:481-189.
31. SMALL, M., AND J. D. SINGER (1982) Resort to Arms: International and Civil Wars, 1816-19SO. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32. SNYDER, G. H., AND P. DIESING (1977) Conflict Among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.