When "They" becomes "We": Multiple contrasting identities in mixed status groups

Self and Identity

Volumn 6, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 154-172

  Sanchez, Amy K ^a   Zogmaister, Cristina ^a   Arcuri, Luciano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248551108     PISSN: 15298868     EISSN: 15298876     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15298860601128255     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Battacchi, M. W. (1972) Meridionali e settentrionali nella struttura del pregiudizio etnico in Italia [Southerners and Northerners in the structure of ethnic prejudice in Italy], Il Mulino, Bologna, Italy
2. Bratt, C. (2002) Contact and attitudes between ethnic groups: A survey-based study of adolescents in Norway. Acta Sociologica, 45, pp. 107-125.
3. Brewer, M. B. (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, pp. 475-482.
4. Brewer, M. B. and Miller, N. (1996) Intergroup relations, Open University Press, Oxford, UK
5. Cadinu, M. R. and Cerchioni, M. (2001) Compensatory biases after in-group threat: "Yeah, but we have a good personality". European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, pp. 353-367.
6. Capozza, D., Bonaldo, E. and DiMaggio, A. (1982) Problems of identity and social conflict: Research on ethnic groups in Italy. Social identity and intergroup relations, pp. 299-334. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
7. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Niemann, Y. F. and Snider, K. (2001) Racial, ethnic, and cultural differences in responding to distinctiveness and discrimination on campus: Stigma and common group identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57, pp. 167-188.
8. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L. and Validzic, A. (1998) Intergroup bias: Status, differentiation, and a common in-group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, pp. 109-120.
9. Ellemers, N., Van Rijswijk, W., Roefs, M. and Simons, C. (1997) Bias in intergroup perceptions: Balancing group identity with social reality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, pp. 186-198.
10. Fazio, R. H. (1990) A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. Research methods in personality and social psychology: Review of personality and social psychology, pp. 74-97. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
11. Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A. and Anastasio, P. A. (1994) The contact hypothesis: The role of a common in-group identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Group Research, 25, pp. 224-249.
12. Hetts, J. J., Sakuma, M. and Pelham, B. W. (1999) Two roads to positive regard: Implicit and explicit self-evaluation and culture. Journal of Social Psychology, 35, pp. 512-559.
13. Hornsey, M. J. and Hogg, M. A. (2000) Subgroup relations: A comparison of the mutual intergroup differentiation and common in-group identity models of prejudice reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, pp. 242-256.
14. Hornsey, M. J. and Hogg, M. A. (2002) The effects of status on subgroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, pp. 203-218.
15. Karasawa, M., Karasawa, K. and Hirose, Y. (2004) Homogeneity perception as a reaction to identity threat: Effects of status difference in a simulated society game. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, pp. 613-625.
16. Karpinski, A. and Steinman, R. B. (2006) The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, pp. 16-32.
17. Livingston, R. W. (2002) The role of perceived negativity in the moderation of African Americans' implicit and explicit racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, pp. 405-413.
18. Maass, A., Castelli, L. and Arcuri, L. (2000) Measuring prejudice: Implicit versus explicit techniques. Social identity processes: Trends in theory and research, pp. 96-116. Sage, London
19. Maass, A., Milesi, A., Zabbini, S. and Stahlberg, D. (1995) Linguistic intergroup bias: Differential expectancies or in-group protection?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, pp. 116-126.
20. Mummendey, A., Klink, A., Mielke, R., Wenzel, M. and Blanz, M. (1999) Sociostructural characteristics of intergroup relations and identity management strategies: Results from a field study in East Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, pp. 259-285.
21. Nosek, B. A. (2005) Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 134, pp. 565-584.
22. Pak, A. W., Dion, K. L. and Dion, K. K. (1991) Social-psychological correlates of experienced discrimination: Test of the double jeopardy hypothesis. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 15, pp. 243-254.
23. Roccas, S. (2003) The effect of status on identification with multiple groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, pp. 351-366.
24. Smith, E. R. and Henry, S. (1996) An in-group becomes part of the self: Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, pp. 635-642.
25. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The social psychology of intergroup relations, Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA
26. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of intergroup relations, pp. 7-24. Nelson Hall, Chicago
27. Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A. and McGarty, C. (1994) Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, pp. 454-463.
28. Veenstra, K., Haslam, S. A. and Reynolds, K. J. (2004) The psychology of casualization: Evidence for the mediating roles of security, status and social identification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, pp. 499-514.
29. Wright, S. C., Aron, A. and Tropp, L. R. (2002) Including others (and groups) in the self: Self-expansion and intergroup relations. The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal, and intergroup perspectives, pp. 343-363. Psychology Press, New York
30. Zogmaister, C., Arcuri, L. and Modena, S. (2006) La percezione di gruppi caratterizzati da status sociale asimmetrico. Rapporto tra processi impliciti ed espliciti [The perception of groups characterized by asymmetrical social status. The relationship between implicit and explicit processes]. Rassegna di Psicologia, 13, pp. 93-121.