Including Other (and Groups) in the Self: Self-Expansion and Intergroup Relations

Taylor and Francis Ltd 5

Volumn 9781315800516, Issue , 2014, Pages 343-363

  Wright, Stephen C ^a   Aron, Art ^b   Tropp, Linda R ^c  

^a American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949176918     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315800516     Document Type: Chapter

References (81)

1. Abrams, D„ & Hogg, M. A. (2001). Collective identity: Group membership and self-concept In M. A. Hogg & S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology Vol. 2: Group processes (pp. 425-460). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
2. Abramson, L„ Seligman, M., & Teasdale, J. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49-74.
3. Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Amir, Y. (1976). The role of intergroup contact in change or prejudice and ethnic relations. In P. A. Katz (Ed.), Towards the elimination of racism(pp. 245-308). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
5. Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1986). Love as the expansion of self Understanding attraction and satisfaction. New York: Hemisphere.
6. Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1996). Self and self-expansion in relationships. In G. J. O. Fletcher & J. Fitness (Eds), Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach(pp. 325-344). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Aron, A., Aron, E. N. & Norman, C. (2001). Self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships and beyond. In M. S. Clark & G. J. O. Fletcher (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology Vol. 2: Interpersonal processes. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
8. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.
9. Aron, A., Aron, E. N„ Tudor, M„ & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241-253.
10. Aron, A., & Fraley, B. (1999). Relationship closeness as including other in the self: Cognitive underpinnings and measures. Social Cognition, 17, 140-160.
11. Aron, A., Melinat, E., Aron, E. N., Vallone, R., & Bator, R. (1997).The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 363-377.
12. Aron, A, Norman, C. C, & Aron, E. N. (1998). The self expansion model and motivation. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 22,1-13.
13. Aron, A„ Paris, M„ & Aron, E. N. (1995). Falling in Love: Prospective studies of self-concept change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1102-1112.
14. Baumeister, R. F (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology Vol. 1 (4th ed„ pp. 680-740). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
15. Baumeister, R. F, & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
16. Blake, R. R., Shepard, H. A., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). Managing intergroup conflicts in industry. Houston, TX: Gulf.
17. Branscombe, N. R„ & Ellemers, N. (1998). Coping with group-based discrimination: Individualistic versus group-level strategies. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective(pp. 243-266). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17,475-482.
19. Brewer, M B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
20. Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self-representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
21. Brewer, M. B., & Pickett, C. L. (1999). Distinctiveness motives as a source of the social self. In T. R. Tyler, R. M. Kramer, & O. P. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social.sei/(pp. 47-69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Brown, R., Vivian, J., & Hewstone, M. (1999). Changing attitudes through intergroup contact: The effects of group membership salience. European Journal cf Social Psychology, 29741-764
23. Deaux, K. (1996). Social identification. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.)m Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 777-798). New York: Guilford.
24. Deaux, K. (2000). Models, meanings and motivations. In D. Capozza & R. Brown (Eds.), Social identity processes: Trends in theory and research (pp. 1-14). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on motivation: Volume 38. Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237-288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
26. Dweck, C. S„ & Leggett, E. L. (1988) A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95,256-273.
27. Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorization, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371-389.
28. Ellemers, N„ Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617-626
29. Ellemers, N., Spears, R„ & Doosje, B. (1999). Introduction. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 1-5). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
30. Fiske, S. T., & Depret, E. (1996). Control, interdependence and power: Understanding social cognition and its social context. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology(Vol. 7, pp. 31-61). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
31. Gaertner S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common in-group identity model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
32. Grieve, P., & Hogg, M. A. (1999). Subjective uncertainty and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 926-940.
33. Haddock, G, Zanna, M. P., & Esses, V. M. (1993). Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes towards homosexuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65,1105-1118.
34. Hamberger, J., & Hewstone, M. (1997). Inter-ethnic contact as a predictor of blatant and subtle prejudice: Tests of a model in four West European nations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 173-190.
35. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
36. Herek, G. M„ & Capitanio, J. P. (1996). “Some of my best friends”: Intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals’ attitudes towards gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22,412-424.
37. Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. (1986). Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
38. Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 30, pp. 1-46). New York: Academic Press.
39. Hogg, M. A. (2000). Self-categorization and subjective uncertainty resolution: Cognitive and motivational facets of social identity and group membership. In J. P. Forgas, K. D. Williams, & L. Wheeler (Eds.), The social mind: Cognitive and motivational aspects of interpersonal behavior(pp. 323-349). New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Hogg, M. A. (2001). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. In W Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, 11(pp. 223-255). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
41. Hogg, M. A, & Abrams, D. (1993). Towards a single-process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation in groups. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives(pp. 173-190). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
42. Jackson, J. W., & Smith, E. R. (1999). Conceptualizing social identity: A new framework and evidence for the impact of different dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 120-135.
43. Jetton, Y., Spears, R„ & Manstead, A. S. R. (1997). Distinctiveness threat and proto-typicality: Combined effects on intergroup discrimination and collective self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 635-657.
44. Lemyre, L., & Smith, P. M. (1985). Intergroup discrimination and self-esteem in the minimal group paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 660-670.
45. Linville, P. W. (1985). Self-complexity and affective extremity: Don’t put all of your eggs in one cognitive basket. Social Cognition, 3, 94-120.
46. Luhtanen, R, & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of ones social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318.
47. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
48. McLaughlin-Volpe, T., Aron, A., Wright, S. C, & Reis, H. T. (2000). Intergroup social interactions and intergroup prejudice: Quantity versus quality. Manuscript under review.
49. Miller N„ & Brewer, M. B. (1984). Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation New York: Academic Press.
50. Mlicki, P. P., & Ellemers, N. (1996). Being different or being better? National stereotypes and identifications of Polish and Dutch students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26,97-114.
51. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). In group bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
52. Mullin, B.-A., & Hogg, M. A. (1999). Motivations for group membership: The role of subjective importance and uncertainty reduction. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2 1, 91-102.
53. Oakes, P. (2001). The root of all evil in inter group relations? Unearthing the categorization process. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.)Blackwell handbook of social psychology (Vol. 4): Intergroup processes(pp. 3-21). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
54. Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
55. Pettigrew, T. F. (1986). The contact hypothesis revisited. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters(pp. 169-195). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
56. Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173-185.
57. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
58. Pettigrew, T F, & Tropp, L. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 93-114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Reis, H. T., & Wheeler, L. (1991). Studying social interaction with the Rochester Interaction Record. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 269-318). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
60. Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (1998). Social identity theory’s self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2,40-62.
61. Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development and death. San Francisco: Freeman.
62. Simon, B. (1999). A place in the world: Self and social categorization. In T. R. Tyler, R. M. Kramer, & O. P. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 47-69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Simon, B„ & Kampmeier, C. (2001). Revisiting the individual self: Towards a social psychological theory of the individual self and the collective self. In C. Sedikides & M. B. Brewer(Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 199-218). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
64. Skinner, E. A. (1992). Perceived control: Motivation, coping, and development. In R. Schwarzer(Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 91-106). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
65. Smith, E„ Coats, S., & Walling, D. (1999). Overlapping mental representations of self, in-group, and partner: Further response time evidence and a connection^ model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 873-882.
66. Smith, E., & Henry, S. (1996). An in-group becomes part of the self: Response time evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 635-642.
67. Spears, R„ Doosje, B„ & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553.
68. Steele, J. L. (1999). Cognitive mechanisms of attitude change in close relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
69. Stephan, W. G. (1987). The contact hypothesis in intergroup relations. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes and intergroup relations. Review of personality and social psychology, Vol. 9 (pp. 13-40). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
70. Stevens, L. E„ & Fiske, S. T. (1995). Motivation and cognition in social life: A social survival perspective. Social Cognition, 13,189-214.
71. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
73. Taylor, D. M., & Dube, L. (1986). Two faces of identity: The "1” and the “We”. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 81-98.
74. Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
75. Tropp, L. & Wright, S. C. (1995). Inclusion of in group in the self AdaptingAron Ir Aron’s IOS Scale.Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, New York, NY.
76. Tropp, L. R, & Wright, S. C. (1999). In group identification and relative deprivation: An examination across multiple groups social comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29,707-724.
77. Tropp, L. R„ & Wright, S. C. (2001). In group identification as inclusion of in group in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585-600.
78. Turner, J. C, Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Blackwell.
79. Turner, J. C, Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20,454-463.
80. Williams, K. D., Wheeler, L„ & Harvey, J. (2001). Inside the social mind of the ostracizer. In J. Forgas, K. Williams, & L. Wheeler (Eds.), The social mind: Cognitive and motivational aspects of interpersonal behavior (pp. 294-320). New York: Cambridge University Press.
81. Wright, S. C, & Van der Zande, C. C. (1999). Bicultural friends: When cross-group friendships cause improved intergroup attitudes. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Experimental Social Psychology, St. Louis, MO.