Enamel micro-cracks produced around restorations with flowable composites

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 83-91

  Han, Linlin ^a   Okamoto, Akira ^a   Fukushima, Masayoshi ^b   Okiji, Takashi ^a  

^a NIIGATA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^b NIIGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Conventional hybrid composite; Enamel micro crack; Flowable composite

Indexed keywords

CLEARFIL AP X; CLEARFIL AP-X; CLEARFIL FLOW FX; FILTEK FLOW; FILTEK Z250; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PALFIQUE ESTELITE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; UNIFIL LOFLO PLUS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INJURY; LIGHT; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; PHASE TRANSITION; RADIATION EXPOSURE; TOOTH BRUSHING; VISCOSITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; LIGHT; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; PHASE TRANSITION; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 20644465996     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.24.83     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34: 849-853.
2. Swift EJ, Perdigão J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: A brief history and state of the art. Quint Int 1995; 26: 95-110.
3. Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SHY. Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid conditioned dentin in water-free, acetone-based, single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 236-244.
4. Perdigão J, Ramos JC, Lambrechts P. In vitro interfacial relationship between human dentin and one-bottle dental adhesives. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 218-227.
5. Han L, Edward C, Okamoto A, Iwaku M. A comparative study of the fluoride-releasing adhesive resin materials. Dent Mater J 2002; 21: 9-19.
6. Han L, Neamat A.B, Okamoto A, Iwaku M. Study on the fluoridated adhesive resin cement - Fluoride release, fluoride uptake and acid resistance of the tooth structures. Dent Mater J 2001; 20: 114-122.
7. Ikemura K, Tay FR, Hironaka T, Endo T, Pashley DH. Bonding mechanism and ultrastructural interfacial analysis of a single-step adhesive to dentin. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 707-715.
8. Han L, Okamoto A, Iwaku M. The effects of various clinical factors on marginal enamel micro-cracks produced around composite restoration. Dent Mater J 1992; 11: 26-37.
9. Sunada M, Han L, Okamoto A. Crack initiation of tooth with aging and clinical care. Niigata Dent J 2002; 32: 275-283.
10. Han L, Sunada M, Fukushima M. Enamel cracks and care techniques. The Quintessence 2004; 23: 148-154.
11. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of thermocycling regimens on the nanoleakage of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 189-196.
12. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of load cycling on the nanoleakage of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 111-119.
13. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage patterns of four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 48-56.
14. Shigetani Y, Okamoto A, Neamat AB, Iwaku M. A Study of cavity preparation by Er:YAG laser - Observation of hard tooth structures by laser scanning microscope and examination of the time necessary to remove caries. Dent Mater J 2002; 21: 20-31.
15. Shigetani Y, Tate Y, Okamoto A, Iwaku M, Neamat AB. A study of cavity preparation by Er:YAG laser - Effects on the marginal leakage of composite resin restoration. Dent Mater J 2002; 21: 238-249.
16. Han L, Edward C, Fukushima M, Okamoto A, Okiji T. An ultrastructural analysis of the prototype single-step adhesive applied on enamel and dentin surfaces. Dent Mater J 2004, 23: 321-328.
17. Kamiya N, Motoya T, Mori T, Suzuki H, Hirayama S, Kono Y. Study on the shrinkage stress of aesthetic filling materials during hardening. Japan J Conserv Dent 2001; 44: 716-724.
18. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 146-148.
19. Carlos AG, Federico BS, Jorge GI, Gabriel SE, Miguel A.C.M. Calculation of contraction rates due to shrinkage in light-cured composites. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 228-235.
20. Asmussen E, Jorgensen KD. A microscopic investigation of the adaptation of some plastic filling materials to dental cavity walls. Acta Odontol Scand 1972; 30: 3-21.
21. Asmussen E. Composite restorative resins composition versus wall-to-wall polymerization contraction. Acta Odontol Scand 1975; 33: 337-344.
22. Suliman AA, Boyer DB, Lakes RS. Cusp movement in premolars resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 6-10.
23. Kamiya N, Motoya T, Shio H, Watanabe Y, Suzuki H, Ikemi T. Study on the shrinkage stress of low-viscosity resin during hardening. Japan J Conserv Dent 2002; 45: 178-183.
24. Han L, Fukushima M, Okamoto A, Okiji T. Enamel micro-cracks produced around restorations with flowable resin composites. Japan J Conserv Dent 2004; 47 (Spring Issue): 73.
25. Jorgensen KD, Asmussen E, Shimokobe H. Enamel damages caused by contracting restorative resins. Scand J Dent Res 1975; 83: 120-122.
26. FiltekTM Z250 Universal Reastorative System: Technical Product Profile, 3M Dental Products Laboratory.
27. Miguez PA, Pereira PNR, Foxton RM, Walter R, Nunes MF, Swift Jr EJ. Effects of flowable resin on bond strength and gap formation in Class I restorations. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 839-845.
28. St-Georges AJ, Swift Jr EJ, Thompson JY, Heymann HO. Irradiance effects on the mechanical properties of universal hybrid and flowable hybrid resin composites. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 406-413.
29. Lee IB, Son HH, Um CM. Rheologic properties of "flowable" conventional "hybrid" and condensable composite resins. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 298-307.
30. Hazemoto K. Effect of air bubbles on curing linear shrinkage and marginal seal of Bis-GMA based light-activated composite resins. J J Dent Mater 1992; 11: 849-859.
31. Nemoto K, Komatsu K, Horie K, Bowen RL, Tomotune K, Ikemi T, Namiki Y. Shrinkage stress of composite resin during hardening. Part II: The effects of filler composition on shrinkage stress. J J Dent Mater 1992; 11: 992-998.
32. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress. JADA 2000; 131: 497-503.
33. Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without softstart-polymerization. J Dent 1997; 25: 321-330.
34. Koran P, Kurschner R. Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion, and degree of polymerization. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 17-22.
35. Matsuzawa N, Ikejima I, Fujibayashi K, Momoi Y, Takamizu M. Polymerization shrinkage of resin composites cured by LED with pilse irradiation. Japan J Conserv Dent 2003; 46: 282-288.
36. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 21: 1636-1639.
37. Liu J, Hattori M, Hasegawa K, Yoshinari M, Kawada E, Oda Y. Effect of tubule orientation and dentin location on the microtensile strength of bovine root dentin. Dent Mater J 2002; 2: 73-82.
38. Ishizaki H. Effect of high-intensity irradiation on polymerization characteristics of light-cured composites and development of marginal enamel cracks. J J Conserv Dent 2001; 44: 64-78.
39. Hofmann N, Denner W, Hugo B, Klaiber B. The influence of plasma arc vs. halogen standard or soft-start irradiation on polymerization shrinkage kinetics of polymer matrix composites. J Dent 2003; 31: 383-393.
40. Uno S, Asumussen E. Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. Scand J Dent Res 1991; 99: 440-444.
41. Watts DC, Hindi AA. Intrinsic 'soft-start' polymerization shrinkage-kinetics in an acrylate-based resin-composite. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 39-45.
42. Arikawa H, Kanei T, Fujii K, Fukui K, Homma T. Mechanical properties of light-cured composite resins cured through filters that simulate enamel. Dent Mater J 2002; 21: 147-155.
43. Otsuki M, Tagami J. Z250 composite resin. Home-page information (http://www.mmm.co.jp/hc/dental/product/filling/z250_4_1.html), 3M ESPE Japan.
44. Iga M. Influence of filler content on marginal sealing properties of light-cured composite resin restorations. J J Conserv Dent 1989; 32: 297-315.
45. Asmussen E. Marginal adaptation of restorative resin in acid etched cavities. Acta Odont Scand 1976; 35: 125-134.
46. Hansen EK. Visible light-cured composite resin: Polymerization contraction, contraction pattern and hygroscopic expansion. Scand J Dent Res 1982; 90: 329-335.
47. Han L, Neamat AB, Okamoto A, Iwaku M. A WDX study of resin-dentin interface on wet vs. dry dentin. Dent Mater J 2000; 19: 317-325.
48. Han L, Okamoto A, Ishikawa K, Iwaku M. EPMA observation between dentin and resin interfaces. Part 1: Comparison of wet and dry techniques after short-term storage in water. Dent Mater J 2003; 22: 115-125.
49. 3 and/or HEM A. Dent Mater J 2003; 22: 1-9.