The influence of an equity statement on perceivers' implicit and explicit associations between males and science

New Zealand Journal of Psychology

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 18-24

  Malinen, Sanna ^a   Johnston, Lucy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248402916     PISSN: 0112109X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ayalon, H. (2003). Women and men go to university: mathematical background and gender differences in choice of field in higher education. Sex Roles, 48(5/6), 277-291.
2. Barber, A. E., & Roehlin, M. V. (1993). Job Posting and the Decision to Interview: A Verbal Protocol Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5), 845-856.
3. Blair, I, V. (2002). The Malleability of Automatic Stereotypes and Prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(3), 242-261.
4. Blair, I. V., Ma, J. E., & Lenton, A. P. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 828-841.
5. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K. & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and Explicit Prejudice and Interracial Interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62-68.
6. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
7. Graves, L. M., & Powell, G. N. (1994). Effects of sex-based preferential selection and discrimination on job attitudes. Human Relations, 47, 133-157.
8. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27.
9. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
10. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: I. An Improved Scoring Algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197-216.
11. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, W., Ryan, M., Frost, L. A., & Hopp, C. (1990). Gender Comparisons of Mathematics Attitudes and Affect. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 299-324.
12. Liff, S. (1999). Diversity and equal opportunities: Room for a constructive compromise? Human Resource Management Journal, 9(1), 65-75.
13. Livingston, R. W., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). What are we really priming?: Cue-based versus category-based processing of facial stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 5-18.
14. Matheson, K., Echenberg, A., Taylor, D. M., Rivers, D., & Chow, I. (1994). Women's attitudes toward affirmative action: Putting Actions in Context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(23), 2075-2096.
15. McConnell, A. R., & Leibold, J. M. (2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 435-442.
16. McNab, S. M., & Johnston, L. (2002). The Impact of Equal Employment Opportunity Statements in Job Advertisements on Applicants' Perceptions of Organizations. Australian Journal of Psychology, 54(2), 105-109.
17. Ministry of Education (1997). Maori Participation & Performance in Education. A Literature Review and Research Programme. A summary by Anne Else. Retrieved from www.minedu.govt.nz
18. Nosek, B. A. (1999). Math is hard! Gender, mathematics, and implicit social cognition. Paper presented at the 1999 Graduate Student Conference, New York University, November 19, 1999.
19. Nosek, B. A. & Banaji, M. R. (2001). The Go/No-Go Association Task. Social Cognition, 19, 625-664.
20. Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2002). The Power of the Immediate Situation: Gender Differences in Implicit Math Attitudes. Poster presented at the 2002 conference for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, Savannah, GA. (February 1, 2002).
21. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1998). Gender differences in implicit attitudes towards mathematics. Paper presented at the 1998 meeting for the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago. April 30, 1998. Retrieved from http://www.briannosek.com/papers
22. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ∧= Me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 44-59.
23. National Science Foundation (2002). Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering, 2002. Report by the National Science Foundation. Retrieved http://www.nsf.gov
24. Paddison, L. (1990). The targeted approach to recruitment. Personnel Management, 22(11), 54-58.
25. Perkins, L. A., Thomas, K. M., & Taylor, G. A. (2000). Advertising and recruitment: Marketing to minorities. Psychology & Marketing, 17(3), 235-255.
26. Poehlman, A., Uhlmann, E., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2004). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
27. Rudman, L. A., Ashmore, R. D., & Gary, M. L. (2001). "Unlearning" Automatic Biases: The Malleability of Implicit Prejudice and Stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 856-868.
28. Smith, J. L., & White, P. H. (2002). An examination of implicitly activated, explicitly activated, and nullified stereotypes on mathematical performance: it's not just woman's issue. Sex Roles, 47(3/4), 179-192.
29. Smith, W. J., Wokutch, R. E., Harrington, K. V., & Dennis, B. S. (2004). Organizational Attractiveness and Corporate Social Orientation: Do Our Values Influence our Preference for Affirmative Action or Managing Diversity? Business and Society, 43(1), 69-96.
30. Thomas, K. M., & Wise, P. G. (1999). Organizational Attractiveness and Individual Differences: Are Diverse Applicants Attracted by Different Factors? Journal of Business and Psychology, 13(3), 375-390.
31. Tougas, F., & Beaton, A. M. (1993). Affirmative Action in the Work Place: For Better of For Worse. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 42(3), 253-264.
32. Veilleux, F., & Tougas, F. (1989). Male Acceptance of Affirmative Action Programs for Women: The Results of Altruistic or Egoistic Motives? International Journal of Psychology, 24, 485-496.
33. Walton, P. R. (2003). An Implicit Associations Test, Dexterware.
34. Williams, M. L., & Bauer, T. N. (1994). The effect of a managing diversity policy on organizational attractiveness. Group & Organization Management, 19(3), 295-309.
35. Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (2001). Spontaneous Prejudice in Context: Variability in Automatically Activated Attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 815-827.