Consumer exposure to fragrance ingredients: Providing estimates for safety evaluation

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 246-252

  Cadby, Peter A ^a   Troy, William R ^a   Vey, Matthias G H ^a  

^a NONE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Exposure; Fragrance ingredients; Safety evaluation

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL DERIVATIVE; COSMETIC; FRAGRANCE; PERFUME;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); EVAPORATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN SURFACE; SKIN TOXICITY;

EID: 0036926348     PISSN: 02732300     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/rtph.2002.1581     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Cirimele, V., Kirtz, P., Jamey, C., and Ludes, B. (1999). Are cannabinoids detected in hair after washing with cannabio shampoo? J. Annal. Toxicol. 23, 349-351.
2. COLIPA (1987). The European Cosmetic, Toiletry and Perfumery Association, Survey of Cosmetic Usage. Submitted to the Scientific Committee on Cosmetology, 1992.
3. European Commission (1996). Technical Guidance Document in Support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for New Notified Substances and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for Existing Substances. Office of Official Publications of the European Communities, ISBN 92-827-8011-2.
4. Ford, R. A., Domeyer, B., Easterday, O., Maier, K., and Middleton, J. (2000). Criteria for the development of a data-base for safety evaluation of fragrance ingredients. Regul. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 31, 166-181.
5. Fowler, J. F., and Finley, B. (1995). Quantity of allergen per unit area is more important than concentration in effective patch testing. Am. J. Contact Dermatitis 6, 157-159.
6. Friedmann, P. S., Rees, J., White, S. I., and Matthews, J. N. S. (1990). Low-dose exposure to antigen induces sub-clinical sensitization. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 81, 507-509.
7. Fukayama, M. Y., Easterday, O. D., Serafino, P.-A., Renskers, K. J., North-Root, H., and Schrankel, K. R. (1999). Subchronic inhalation studies of complex fragrance mixtures in rats and hamsters. Toxicol. Lett. 111, 175-187.
8. Lambe, J., Cadby, P., and Gibney, M. (2002). Comparison of Stochastic modelling of the intakes of intentionally added flavouring substances with theoretical maximum intakes (TAMDI) and maximized survey-derived daily intakes (MSDI). Food Additives and Contaminants 19, 2-14.
9. Rees, J. L., Friedmann, P. S., and Matthews, J. N. S. (1990). The influence of area of application on sensitization by dinitrochlorobenzene. Br. J. Dermatol. 122, 29-31.
10. RIFM (1996). Cosmetics: Submission on the Safety Data on Ingredients: 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8-Hexahydro-4, 6, 6, 7, 8, 8-hexamethylcyclopenta-gamma-2-benzopyran (HHCB) and 6-acetyl-1, 1, 2, 4, 4, 7-hexa-methyltetraline (AHTN). Submission to DG XXIV, European Commission, December 13, 1996.
11. Robinson, M. K., Gerberick, G. F., Ryan, C. A., McNamee, P., White, I. R., and Basketter, D. A. (2000). The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitization risk. Contact Dermatitis 42, 251-259.
12. Upadhye, M. R., and Maibach, H. I. (1992). Influence of area of application of allergen on sensitization in contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 27, 281-286.
13. Versar Inc. (1991). Screening Level Consumer Inhalation Exposure Software (SCIES): Description and User's Manual Version 3.0. Draft report, US-EPA 68-D9-0166.
14. White, S. I., Friedman, P. S. Moss, C., and Simpson, J. M. (1986). The effect of altering area of application and dose per unit area on sensitization by DNCB. Br. J. Dermatol. 115, 663-668.