Dental adhesives …. How it all started and later evolved

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 9, Issue , 2007, Pages 227-230

  Söderholm, Karl Johan M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical evaluations; Generations; Review

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; TOOTH CEMENT;

CHEMISTRY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; ENAMEL;

DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS;

EID: 34248187495     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: 17579988     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a12209     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alhadainy HA, Abdalla AI. 2-year clinical evaluation of dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 1996;9:77-79.
2. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl L. One-year clinical evaluation of an ethanol-based and a solvent-free dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 2004;17:451-456.
3. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl LA. A three-year clinical evaluation of twobottle versus one-bottle dentin adhesives. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:311-322.
4. Barkmeier WW. International Symposium on adhesives in dentistry. Oper Dent 1992;Suppl 5.
5. Bowen RL, Blosser RL, Johnston AD. Effects of ferric oxalate purity on adhesive bonding to dentin [abstract 915]. J Dent Res 1985;64:276.
6. Bowen RL, Cobb EN. A method for bonding to dentin and enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;107:734-736.
7. Bowen RL. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. I. method of determining bond strength. J Dent Res 1965;44:690-695.
8. Bowen RL. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. II. Bonding to dentin promoted by a surface-active comonomer. J Dent Res 1965;44:895-902.
9. Bowen RL. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues.III. Bonding to dentin improved by pre-treatment and the use of surface-active comonomer. J Dent Res 1965;44:903-905.
10. Bowen RL. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. IV. Bonding to dentin, enamel, and fluorapatite improved by the use of a surfaceactive comonomer. J Dent Res 1965;44:906-911.
11. Bowen RL. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. VI. Forces developing in direct-filling materials during hardening. J Am Dent Assoc 1967;74:439-445.
12. Brännström M, Nyborg H. The presence of bacteria in cavities filled with silicate cement and composite resin materials. Sven Tandlak Tidskr 1971;64:149-155.
13. Brudevold F, Buonocore M, Wileman W. A report on a resin composition capable of bonding to human dentin surfaces. J Dent Res 1956;35:846-851.
14. Brunton PA, Cowan AJ, Wilson MA, Wilson NH. A three-year evaluation of restorations placed with a smear-layer-mediated dentin bonding agent in non-carious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:333-341.
15. Buonocore M. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-853.
16. Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Two-year clinical evaluation of One-Up Bond F in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:65-68.
17. Chigira H, Manabe A, Itoh K, Wakumoto S, Hayakawa T. Efficacy of glyceryl methacrylate as a dentin primer. Dent Mater J 1989;8:194-199.
18. Dalton Bittencourt D, Ezecelevski IG, Reis A, Van Dijken JW, Loguercio AD. An 18-months’ evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2005;30:275-281.
19. Dunn WJ, Söderholm KJ. Comparison of shear and flexural bond strength tests versus failure modes of dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 2001; 14:297-303.
20. Fastlicht S. Tooth Mutilations and Dentistry in Pre-Columbian Mexico. Chicago:Quintessence 1976.
21. Federlin M, Thonemann B, Schmalz G, Urlinger T. Clinical evaluation of different adhesive systems for restoring teeth with erosion lesions. Clin Oral Investig 1998;2:58-66.
22. Fusayama T, Nakamura M, Kurosaki N, Iwaku M. Non-pressure adhesion of a new adhesive restorative resin. J Dent Res 1979;58:1364-1370.
23. Gallo JR, Burgess JO, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ, Mercante DE, Davidson JM. Three-year clinical evaluation of a compomer and a resin composite as Class V filling materials. Oper Dent 2005;30:275-281.
24. Gwinnett AJ. Moist versus dry dentin: its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent 1992;5:127-129.
25. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. A comparative study of dentin adhesives. Scand J Dent Res 1985;93:280-287.
26. Helbig EB, Klimm HW, Schreger IE, Haufe E, Natusch I. Controlled clinical study of the anterior composite-adhesive system Point 4/OptiBond Solo Plus. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2002;112:1230-1235.
27. Hoffmann-Axthelm W. History of Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1976:293-295.
28. Kanca J 3rd: Resin bonding to wet substrate. 1. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 1992; 23:39-41.
29. Kramer IRH, McLean JW. The response of the human pulp to self-polymerising acrylic. Br Dent J 1952;93:150-153.
30. Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2006;34:97-105.
31. Mandras RS, Thurmond JW, Latta MA, Matranga LF, Kildee JM, Barkmeier WW. Three-year clinical evaluation of the Clearfil Liner Bond system. Oper Dent 1997;22:266-270.
32. Matis BA, Cochran MJ, Carlson TJ, Guba C, Eckert GJ. A three-year clinical evaluation of two dentin bonding agents. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:451-457.
33. McLean JW. Historical Overview: The pioneers of enamel and dentin bonding. In: Roulet J-F, Degrange M (eds). Adhesion - The silent revolution in dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 2000;13-17.
34. Munksgaard EC, Assmussen E. Bond strength between dentin and restorative resins mediated by a mixture of HEMA and glutaraldehyde. J Dent Res 1984;63:1087-1089.
35. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16:265-273.
36. Perdigao J, Carmo AR, Geraldeli S. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of two dentin adhesives applied on dry vs moist dentin. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:253-258.
37. Servais Ge, Cartz L. Structure of zinc phosphate dental cement. J Dent Res 1971;50:613-620.
38. Silverstone LE, Dogon II. Proceedings of an international symposium on the Acid Etch Technique. St. Paul: North Central, 1975.
39. Söderholm KJ, Guelmann M, Bimstein E. Shear bond strength of one 4th and two 7th generation bonding agents when used by operators with different bonding experience. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:57-64.
40. Stanley HR, Going RE, Chauncey HH. Human pulp response to acid pretreatment of dentin and to composite restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 1975;91:817-825.
41. Türkün SL. Clinical evaluation of a self-etching and a one-bottle adhesive system at two years. J Dent 2003;31:527-534.
42. Van Dijken JW. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in Class V noncarious lesions. Dent Mater 2000;16:285-291.
43. Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Evaluation of two dentin adhesives in cervical lesions. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:672-673.
44. Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli PV, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating the three-year clinical effectiveness of two etch & rinse adhesives in cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2004;29:376-385.