Comparison of shear and flexural bond strength tests versus failure modes of dentin bonding systems

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 297-303

  Dunn, William Jackson ^a,b   Söderholm, Karl Johan M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b 59th Dental Squadron ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; CLEARFIL SE BOND; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE; SILICON DIOXIDE; SINGLE BOND; WATER; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; ELECTRON PROBE MICROANALYSIS; HARDNESS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PLIABILITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TIME; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ADHESIVES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; ELECTRON PROBE MICROANALYSIS; HARDNESS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; ORTHODONTIC WIRES; PLIABILITY; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; WATER; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0035495175     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Prati C, Biagini G, Rizzoli C, et al. Shear bond strength and SEM evaluation of dentinal bonding systems. Am J Dent 1990;3:283-288.
2. Chappell RD, Eick JD, Theisen FC, et al. Shear bond strength and scanning electron microscopic observation of current dentinal adhesives. Quintessence Int 1991;3:106-113.
3. Dickinson GL, Stevens JT, Overberger JE, et al. Comparison of shear bond strengths of some third generation dentin bonding agents. Oper Dent 1991;16:223-230.
4. Triolo PT, Swift Jr EJ. Shear bond strengths of ten dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater 1992;8:370-374.
5. Swift Jr EJ, Bayne SC. Shear bond strength of a new one-bottle dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 1997;10:184-188.
6. Fritz UB, Finger WJ. Bonding efficiency of single bottle enamel/dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 1999;12:277-282.
7. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, et al. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength. Evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994;10:236-240.
8. Jacobsen T, Söderholm K-J M. Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1995;11:132-136.
9. Dious C, Tsai B, Söderholm K-JM. Effects of dentin morphology on dentinal adhesion. J Dent Res 1996;75:390 (Abstr 2978).
10. Munksgaard EC, Irie M, Asmussen E. Dentin-polymer bond promoted by Gluma and various resins. J Dent Res 1985;64:1409-1411.
11. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin? J Dent Res 1997;76:1298-1307.
12. Øilo G. Bond strength testing. What does it mean? Int Dent J 1993;43:492-498.
13. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: A review. Dent Mater 1995;11:117-125.
14. Tantbirojn D, Cheng YS, Versluis A. Nominal shear or fracture mechanics in the assessment of composite-dentin adhesion? J Dent Res 2000;79:41-48.
15. Watanabe LG, Marshall GW Jr, Marshall SJ. Dentin shear strength: Effects of tubule orientation and intratooth location. Dent Mater 1996; 12:109-115.
16. Tam LE, Pilliar RM. Fracture toughness of dentin/resin-composite adhesive interfaces. J Dent Res 1993;72:953-959.
17. Lin CP, Douglas WH. Failure mechanisms at the human dentin-resin interface: A fracture mechanics approach. J Biomechanics 1994;27:1037-1047.
18. Swift Jr EJ, Triolo PT. Bond strength of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose to moist dentin and enamel. Am J Dent 1992;5:318-320.
19. Pashley EL, Zhang Y, Lockwood PE, et al. Effects of HEMA on water evaporation from water-HEMA mixtures. Dent Mater 1998;14:6-10.
20. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS. Evaluation of adhesive systems using acidic primers. Am J Dent 1997;10:219-223.