The marginal seal of class II restorations: Flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer

Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 123-130

  Payne IV, John H ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FUJI II LC CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; OPTIBOND; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TETRIC;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH DISEASE; VISCOSITY;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; EVALUATION STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; RESIN CEMENTS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0033455533     PISSN: 10534628     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Abdalia I, Davidson C. Sheer bond strength and microleakage of new dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 6: 295-298, 1993.
2. Aquilino S, Williams V, Svare C. The effect of storage solutions and mounting media on the bond strengths of a dentinal adhesive to dentin. Dental Materials 3: 131-135, 1987.
3. Belvedere PC. Posterior composites: injecting composite resins and using mylar matrix bands will eliminate gingival margin failures and increase tight contacts. Northwest Dentistry 73: 19-22, 1994.
4. Bertoli R. Directed shrinkage. Practical Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry 3: 53-58, 1991.
5. Blixt M, Coli P. The influence of lining techniques on the marginal seal of Class II composite resin restorations. Quintessence International 24: 203-10, 1993.
6. Bonner PB. New developments in composite restorations. Dent Today 16: 44-47, 1997.
7. Bryant R, Marzbani N, Hodge K. Occlusal margin defects around different types of composite resin restorations in posterior teeth. Oper Dent 17: 215-221, 1992.
8. Burgess JO. et al. In vivo Comparison of pin and amalgam retained complex restorations. J Dent Res Spec 75: 171, 1996.
9. Carvalho R, Pereira J, Yoshiyama M, Pashley D. A review of polymerization contraction: The influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 21: 17-24, 1946.
10. Coli P, Brannstrom M. The marginal adaptation of four different bonding agents in class II composite resin restoration applied in bulk or in two increments. Quintessence International 24: 583-91, 1993.
11. Cox CF, Suzuki S. Re-evaluating pulp protection. JADA 125: 823-831, 1994.
12. Crim GA, Chapman KW. Reducing microleakage in class II restorations: an in-vitro study. Quintessence International 25: 781-85, 1994.
13. Davidson C, Kemp-Scholte C. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restoration effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69: 1240-1243, 1990.
14. Dickenson G, Leinfelder K, Mazer R, Russell C. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on wear rate of posterior composite resins. JADA 121: 25 1-255, 1990.
15. Dickenson G, Leinfelder K. Assessing the long term effect of a surface penetrating sealant. JADA 124: 68-72, 1993.
16. Dietschi D, Scampa U, Campanile G, Holz E. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect Class II composite resin restorations: an in-vitro evaluation. Quintessence International 26: 127-38, 1995.
17. Ferracane J. Current trends in dental composites. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 6: 302-318, 1995.
18. Ferracane J. Using posterior composites appropriately. JADA 123: 53-58, 1992.
19. Friedl K, Hilley K, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of composite restorations in Germany. Oper Dent 20: 34-38, 1995.
20. Fukushima M, Setcos E, Phillips R. Marginal fracture of posterior composite resins. JADA 117: 577-583, 1988.
21. Garberoglio R, Coli P, Brannstrom M. Contraction gaps in class II restorations with light cured resin composites. Am J Dent 8: 302-7, 1995.
22. Haller B, Hofmann N, Klaiber B, Bloching U. Effect of storage media on microleakage of five dentin bonding agents. Dent Mat 9: 191-197, 1993.
23. Leinfelder K. A conservative approach to placing posterior composite resin restorations. JADA 127: 743-748, 1996.
24. Leinfelder K. Posterior composite resins. JADA 126: 663-676, 1995.
25. Leinfelder K, Wilder A, Teixeira C. Wear rates of posterior composite resins. JADA 112: 829-833, 1986.
26. Lutz F. The post amalgam age. Oper Dent 20: 218-222, 1995.
27. Mangum FI, Jr., Berry BA, DeSchepper E, Rieger MR. Microleakage of incremental versus compression matrix bulk filling of cervical resin composite restorations. Gen Dent 42: 304-8, 1995.
28. Phillips R, Lutz F. Status reports on posterior composites. JADA 107: 74-76, 1983.
29. Prati C, Tao L, Simpson M, Pashley DH. Permeability and microleakage of class II resin composite restorations. J Dent 22: 49-56, 1994.
30. Rada RE. The versatility of flowable composites. Dent Today 17 (April): 78-83, 1998.
31. Ratanapridakul K, Leinfelder K, Thomas J. Effect of finishing on the in-vivo wear rate of posterior composites. JADA 118: 333-335, 1989.
32. Schmalz G, Federlin M, Reich E. Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a Class II ceramic inlay. J Prosthet Dent 73: 392-9, 1995.
33. Sturdevent C, Roberson T, Heymann H, Sturdevent E. The art and science of operative dentistry. Mosby Year Book, 3rd ed. 1995.
34. Suzuki S, et al., Histological evaluation of 4 META adhesive systems on non-exposed pulp. J Dent Res 75: 389, 1996.
35. Tzan AH, Bergh BH, Linder C. Effect of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of Class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 67: 62-66, 1992.
36. Uno S, Shimokobe H. Contraction stress and marginal adaptation of composite restorations in dentinal cavity. Dental Materials J 13: 19-24, 1994.
37. Yap Au, Lim CC, Neo JC. Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems. Quintessence International 26: 817-20, 1995.
38. Youngson C, Grey N, Mortin D. An in vitro marginal microleakage associated with five dentin bonding systems and associated composite restorations. J Dent 18: 203-208, 1990.
39. Barbabow F, Ackerman M, Krejci I, Lutz F. Amalgam as the measure in filling therapy. A determination of its place. Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin 104: 1341-50, 1994.