The 2005 NPT review conference mission impossible?

Nonproliferation Review

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 271-301

  Simpson, John ^a   Nielsen, Jenny ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

2005 NPT Review Conference; NPT review process; Nuclear disarmament; Nuclear nonproliferation

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248030893     PISSN: 10736700     EISSN: 17461766     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10736700500378901     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Carl Stoiber, “The Evolution of NPT Review Conference Final Documents, 1975-2000,”Nonproliferation Review 10 (Fall-Winter 2003), http://cns.miis.edu/pubs/npr/vol10/103/103stoi.pdf
2. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), “The Second NPT Review Conference,”in World Armaments and Disarmament: SIPRI Yearbook 1981 (London: Taylor &Francis, 1981), pp. 297-338
3. Jozef Goldblat, “The Third Review of the NPT Treaty,”in World Armaments and Disarmament: SIPRI Yearbook 1986 (London: Taylor & Francis, 1986), pp. 469-80
4. David Fischer and Harald Muller, “The Fourth Review of the Non-Proliferation Treaty,”in World Armaments and Disarmament: SIPRI Yearbook 1991 (London: Taylor & Francis, 1991), pp. 555-84
5. John Simpson, “The 1990 Review Conference of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty: Pointer to the Future or Diplomatic Accident,”Round Table (April 1991), pp. 139-54
6. Jayantha Dhanapala, Randy Rydell, Multilateral Diplomacy and the NPT: An Insider’s Account (Geneva: UNIDIR/United Nations Publication, 2005), pp. 8-10
7. John Simpson, “The 1995 NPT Review Conference: Procedural and Substantive Issues,”in Theodore A. Couloumbis and Thanos P. Dokos, eds., Arms Control and Security in the Middle East and the CIS Republics (Athens: Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy, 1995)
8. Tariq Rauf, and Rebecca Johnson, “After the NPT’s Indefinite Extension: The Future of the Global Nonproliferation Regime,”Nonproliferation Review 3 (Fall 1995), http://cns.miis.edu/pubs/npr/vol03/31/raufjo31.pdf
9. Thomas Graham, “Surviving the Storm: The NPT Regime after the 2000 Review Conference,”Disarmament Diplomacy (May 2000), www.acronym.org.uk/dd/dd46/46storm.htm
10. Tariq Rauf, “The 2000 NPT Review Conference,”Nonproliferation Review 7 (Spring 2000),
11. Tariq Rauf, “Ambassador Abdallah Baali on the 2000 NPT Review Conference,”(interview), Nonproliferation Review 7 (Fall-Winter 2000),
12. John Simpson, “The 2000 NPT Review Conference,”in Armaments, Disarmament and International Security: SIPRI Yearbook 2001 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 487-511.
13. Jayantha Dhanapala, Randy Rydell, Multilateral Diplomacy and the NPT
14. Tariq Rauf, and Rebecca Johnson, “After the NPT’s Indefinite Extension.,”
15. John Simpson and Emily Bailey, “The 1998 PrepCom for the 2000 NPT Review Conference: Issues and Options,”PPNN Issue Review (April 1998), Mountbatten Centre for International Studies for the Programme for Promoting Nuclear Non-Proliferation, www.mcis.soton.ac.uk/ir14.pdf
16. Rebecca Johnson, “Reviewing the NPT: The 1997 PrepCom,”Disarmament Diplomacy (April 1997), http://www.acronym.org.uk/dd/dd14/14prep.htm
17. Tariq Rauf, “The April 1998 NPT PrepCom,”Nonproliferation Review 5 (Winter 1998),
18. John Simpson and Emily Bailey, “The 1998 PrepCom for the 2000 NPT Review Conference: Issues and Options,”PPNN Issue Review (April 1998)
19. Tariq Rauf, “PrepCom Opinion: Farewell to the NPT’s Strengthened Review Process?,”Disarmament Diplomacy (May 1998), http://www.acronym.org.uk/dd/dd26/26tariq.htm
20. Rebecca Johnson, “The NPT Third PrepCom: What Happened and How,”Disarmament Diplomacy (May 1999),
21. Tariq Rauf and John Simpson, “The 1999 NPT PrepCom,”Nonproliferation Review 6 (Winter 1999), http://cns.miis.edu/pubs/npr/vol06/62/prep62.pdf
22. NPT RevCon, Final Document, Volume 1, Part 1: Improving the effectiveness of the strengthened review process for the Treaty, Article 9, para 7, p. 20, http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N00/453/64/PDF/N0045364.pdf?OpenElement
23. William C. Potter, Mary Beth Nikitin, and Tariq Rauf, “Ambassador Henrik Salander on the 2002 NPT Preparatory Committee,”(interview) Nonproliferation Review 9 (Summer 2002),
24. Jean DuPreez, “Interview with Laszlo Molnar, The Second NPT Preparatory Committee: Issues, Results, Implications for the 2005 Review Conference,”Nonproliferation Review 11 (Spring 2004),”http://cns.miis.edu/pubs/npr/vol11/111/111molnar.pdf
25. Tanya Ogilvie-White and John Simpson, “The NPT and its 2003 PrepCom Session: A Regime in Need of Intensive Care,”Nonproliferation Review 10 (Spring 2003),
26. Rebecca Johnson, “Report on the 2004 NPT PrepCom,”Disarmament Diplomacy (May/ June 2004),
27. John Simpson and Jenny Nielsen, “Fiddling While Rome Burns? The 2004 NPT PrepCom,”Nonproliferation Review 11 (Summer 2004), http://cns.miis.edu/pubs/npr/vol11/112/112simpson.pdf
28. Preparatory Committee 2005 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (2005 PrepCom), “Chairman’s Summary,”NPT/CONF.2005/PC.III/WP 27, May 10, 2004, http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N04/344/47/PDF/N0434447.pdf?OpenElement
29. DPRK “an automatic and immediate effectuation of its withdrawal from the NPT.,”For the text of the statement in its entirety, see KCNA News Agency, “Text of North Korea’s Statement on NPT Withdrawal,”Jan 10, 2003, http://cns.miis.edu/research/korea/NPTstate.htm
30. KCNA News Agency, “N. Korea’s statement in full,”BBC News, Feb 10, 2005, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4252515.stm
31. Thomas L. Neff, “The Nuclear Fuel Cycle and The Bush Nonproliferation Initiative,”paper for World Nuclear Fuel Cycle 2004, World Nuclear Association/Nuclear Energy Institute, Madrid, April 1, 2004, http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/Focus/FuelCycle/neff.pdf
32. Jon B. Wolfsthal, Assessing Proposals on the International Nuclear Fuel Cycle, Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission (WMDC) Report No. 11, June 2004,
33. Jon B. Wolfsthal, “The Nuclear Third Rail: Can Fuel Cycle Capabilities Be Limited?,”Arms Control Today 34 (Dec 2004), www.armscontrol.org/act/2004_12/Wolfsthal.asp
34. International Atomic Energy Agency Multilateral Approaches to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Expert Group Report Submitted to the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA INFCIRC/640, Feb 22, 2005, www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/2005/infcirc640.pdf
35. Tariq Rauf and Fiona Simpson, “The Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Is It Time for a Multilateral Approach?,”Arms Control Today 34 (Dec. 2004), www.armscontrol.org/act/2004_12/Rauf.asp
36. The White House, Press Release, Feb 11, 2004, “President Announces New Measures to Counter the Threat of WMD: Remarks by the President on Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation,”National Defense University, Washington, DC, Feb 11 2004, www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/02/print/20040211-4.html
37. RevCon, “List of non-governmental organizations,”April 29, 2005, NPT/CONF.2005/INF.2 .
38. Rebecca Johnson, “Rogues and Rhetoric: The 2003 NPT PrepCom Slides Backwards,”Disarmament Diplomacy (June/July 2003), p. 4, www.acronym.org.uk/dd/dd71/71NPT.htm
39. Rebecca Johnson, “‘The Miserable Failure of the NPT to Contain the Nuclear Spectre?’ NPT Review Conference Day 3 (May 4),”The NPT Review Conference 2005: Acronym Special Coverage, The Acronym Institute, May 5, 2005,
40. Rebecca Johnson, “‘Decisions, Resolution and Outcomes: Frustration as Agenda is Thwarted,’ NPT Review Conference entering Week 2 (May 9),”The NPT Review Conference 2005: Acronym Special Coverage, The Acronym Institute, May 7, 2005, www.acronym.org.uk/NPT/05rep03.htm
41. Rebecca Johnson, “Decisions, Resolution and Outcomes.,”
42. RevCon document, “Proposed Programme of Work (19 to 27 May 2005),”NPT/CONF.2005/INF.5, May 19, 2005, www.un.org/events/NPT2005/NPT-conf2005-inf5.Pdf
43. RevCon document, “Report of Main Committee II,”NPT/CONF.2005/MC.II/1, May 25, 2005, http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N05/360/01/PDF/N0536001.pdf?OpenElement
44. RevCon document, “Report of Main Committee I,”NPT/CONF.2005/MC.I/1, May 25, 2005, http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N05/359/89/PDF/N0535989.pdf?OpenElement
45. RevCon document, “Report of Main Committee III,”NPT/CONF.2005/MC.III/1, May 25, 2005, http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N05/359/95/PDF/N0535995.pdf?OpenElement
46. RevCon document, “Closing Remarks by Amb. Paul Meyer, Canadian Ambassador for Disarmament,”statement to the Final Plenary of the 2005 NPT Review Conference, May 27, 2005, www.reachingcriticalwill.org/legal/NPT/RevCon05/GDstatements/canada27.doc
47. Rebecca Johnson, “Day 26: Spineless NPT Conference Papers Over Cracks and Ends with a Whimper,”The NPT Review Conference 2005: Acronym Special Coverage, The Acronym Institute, May 27, 2005,
48. RevCon, “Statement by Ambassador Alfredo Labbe´, Alternate Permanent Representative of Chile to the United Nations to the final Plenary of the VII Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,”May 27, 2005, www.reachingcriticalwill.org/legal/NPT/RevCon05/GDstatements/chile2005.24.doc
49. RevCon document NPT/CONF.2005/WP.27, para. 1-13, pp. 1-2.
50. RevCon document NPT/CONF.2005/WP.34., para. 1-13, pp.1-2.
51. RevCon document NPT/CONF.2005/WP.27, para. 6-19, pp. 2-3.
52. RevCon “Nuclear Disarmament and Reduction of the Danger of Nuclear War: Working Paper submitted to the 2005 RevCon by China, April 26, 2005, NPT/CONF.2005/WP.2, http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N05/323/46/PDF/N0532346.pdf?OpenElement
53. RevCon document NPT/CONF.2005/WP.19, para 1, p. 1.
54. RevCon document NPT/CONF.2005/WP.19, para 7, p. 2.
55. RevCon document NPT/CONF.2005/WP.19, para 8, p. 2.
56. RevCon document NPT/CONF.2005/WP.19, para 10, p. 3.
57. RevCon document NPT/CONF.2005/WP.19, para 16, p. 4.
58. RevCon document NPT/CONF.2005/WP.19, para 4, p. 1.
59. RevCon document NPT/CONF.2005/WP.19, para 3, p. 1.
60. RevCon document NPT/CONF.2005/WP.19, para 9, p. 2
61. RevCon document, “Withdrawal from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,”NPT/CONF.2005/WP.32,
62. RevCon document, “Withdrawal from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferationof Nuclear Weapons,”NPT/CONF.2005/WP.32, para. II.3, pp.1-2. http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N05/339/76/PDF/N0533976.pdf?OpenElement
63. Nuclear Suppliers Group, Guidelines for Nuclear Transfers, INFCIRC/254/Rev.5/Part 1, 16 Jan 2002, pp. L7-L11, www.mcis.soton.ac.uk/Site_Files/site_resources/bb-volii-2005/sectionl.pdf
64. NPT/CONF.2000/28 (Parts I and II), Article 9, para. 16, sub. para. 10, p. 18.
65. Dana Milbank and Dafna Linzer, “U.S., India May Share Nuclear Technology: Bush Move to Reverse Policy on Civilian Aid Needs Hill Approval,”Washington Post, July 19, 2005, p. A01, www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/18/AR2005071801646_pf.html