The 2000 NPT review conference

Nonproliferation Review

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 146-161

  Rauf, Tariq ^a  

^a MONTEREY INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85023668421     PISSN: 10736700     EISSN: 17461766     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10736700008436802     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Honourable Lloyd Axworthy, Minister of Foreign Affairs to the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade, “India’s Nuclear Testing: Implications for Nuclear Disarmament and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime,” Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (Ottawa, Canada: May 26, 1998)
2. Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Final Document: Parti- Organization and Work of the Conference, Decision 1, “Strengthening the Review Process for the Treaty,” (New York: United Nations, 1995), Annex, p. 8.
3. Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Final Document: Part I-Organization and Work of the Conference, Decision 2, “Principles and Objectives for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament,” (New York: United Nations, 1995), Annex, pp. 9-12.
4. Non-Proliferation ofNuclear Weapons, Final Document: Part I - Organization and Work of the Conference, Decision 3, “Extension of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation ofNuclear Weapons,” (New York: United Nations, 1995), Annex, pp. 12-13.
5. Non-Proliferation ofNuclear Weapons, Final Document: Part I -Organization and Work of the Conference, “Resolution on the Middle East,” (New York: United Nations, 1995), Annex, pp. 13-14.
6. Non-Proliferation, Arms Control and Disarmament Division, Department of Foreign Affairs (Canada), A Non-Paper on Strengthening Review Conferences (Ottawa: January 1995; revised March 1995), unpublished.
7. Avner Cohen, Israel and the Bomb (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998), chs. 10-11.
8. Mohamed El Baradei, Director General, Statement to the General Conference (September 27, 1999), IAEA.
9. Henry Fox, “Review of Existing Export Control Regimes,” presented at the United Nations Conference on Disarmament Issues, Nagasaki, Japan, November 1998, pp. 13-14.
10. Alison Mitchell, “Summit Talks End With Agreements, but Not for NATO,” New York Times, March 22, 1997, p. A6.
11. Alison Mitchell United Kingdom Strategic Defence Review, “Modem Forces for a Modem World,” United Kingdom Ministry of Defence (July 8, 1998)
12. “Just Say ‘No’,” Arms Control Today 29 (November 1999), p. 2.
13. International Court of Justice, “Legality of the Threat or Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict (Request for Advisory Opinion by the General Assembly of the United Nations),” Communiqué No. 96/23 (July 8, 1996)
14. Darach Mac Fhionnbhairr, “Fulfilling Article VI Commitments on Nuclear Disarmament,” Workshop on the 2000 Conference of the Strengthened NPT Review, sponsored by the Monterey Institute of International Studies, New York, November 1, 1999.
15. Strobe Talbott in C. Raja Mohan, “Early Solution to Nuclear Issues Will Help: Talbott,” The Hindu, January 14,2000.
16. Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, “Address at India International Center,” New Delhi, India (January 30, 1999)
17. Jayantha Dhanapala, “The NPT Review Process: Identifying New Ideas to Strengthen the Regime,” UNIDIR Newsletter, No. 37, p. 10.
18. Facing Nuclear Dangers: An Action Plan for the 21" Century, The Report of the Tokyo Forum for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament, July 25, 1999.
19. J. Moher, Permanent Representative and Ambassador of Canada to the United Nations for Disarmament, to the Third Preparatory Committee for the 2000.
20. Intervention de S.E.M. Hubert de La Fortelle, Ambassadeur, Chef de la délégation française,” New York, May 10, 1999.
21. Mr. Wulf (United States), NPT/CONF.2000/PC.III/SR.2, para. 12, p. 4.