Calculation of redox properties: Understanding short- and long-range effects in rubredoxin

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 111, Issue 15, 2007, Pages 3969-3976

  Sulpizi, Marialore ^a   Raugei, Simone ^b   VandeVondele, Joost ^c   Carloni, Paolo ^b   Sprik, Michiel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b SISSA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE; PROTEINS;

DIELECTRIC RESPONSE; MESOPHILIC RUBREDOXIN; MOLECULAR DESCRIPTION; THERMOPHILIC RUBREDOXIN;

REDOX REACTIONS;

EID: 34247868775     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp067387y     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Meyer J.; Moulis J. M. Rubredoxin. In Handbook of Metalloproteins; Messerschmidt, A,. Huber, R., Wieghardt, K., Poulos, T., Eds.; Wiley: New York,2001; pp 505-517 and references therein.
2. Gray, H. B.; Winkler, J. R. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1996, 65, 537-561.
3. Gray, H. B.; Winkler, J. R. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2003, 36, 341-372.
4. Gray, H. B.; Winkler, J. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102 (10), 3534-3539.
5. Marcus, R. A.; Sutin, N. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1985, 811, 265-322.
6. Olsson, M. H. M.; Hong, G.; Warshel, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5025-5039.
7. Warshel, A.; Levitt, M. J. Mol. Biol 1976, 103, 227-249.
8. Colombo, M. C.; Guidoni, L.; Laio, A.; Magistrato, A.; Maurer, P.; Piana, S.; Röhrig, U.; Spiegel, K.; Sulpizi, M.; VandeVondele, J.; Zumstein, M.; Röthlisberger, U. Chimia 2002, 56, 13-19.
9. Gao, J.; Truhlar, D. G. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2002, 53, 467-505.
10. Warshel, A.J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 2218-2224
11. Dauter, Z.; Wilson, K. S.; Sieker, L. C.; Moulis, J. M.; Meyer, J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93, 8836-8840.
12. Min, T.; Ergenekan, C. E.; Eidsness, M. K.; Ichiye, T.; Kang, C. Protein Sci. 2001, 10, 613-621.
13. Xiao, Z.; Lavery, M. J.; Ayhan, M.; Scrofani, S. D. B.; Wilce, M. C. J.; Guss, J. M.; Tregloan, P. A.; George, G. N.; Wedd, A. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4135-4150.
14. Maher, M.; Cross, M.; Wilce, M. C. J.; Guss, J. M.; Wedd, A. G. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 2004, 60, 298-303.
15. Meyer, J.; Gaillard, J.; Lutz, M. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995, 212, 827-833.
16. Kummerle, R.; Zhuang-Jackson, H.; Gaillard, J.; Moulis, J. M. Biochemistry 1997, 36, 15983-16991.
17. Park, I. Y.; Eidsness, M. K.; Lin, I. J.; Gebel, E. B.; Youn, B.; Harley, J. L.; Machonkin, T. E.; Frederick, R. O.; Markley, J. L.; Smith, E. T.; Ichiye, T.; Kang, C. Proteins 2004, 57, 618-624.
18. Eidsness, M. K.; Burden, A. E.; Richie, K. A.; Kurtz, D. M.; Scott, R. A.; Smith, E. T.; Ichiye, T.; Beard, B.; Min, T.; Kang, C. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 14803-14809.
19. Lin, I. J.; Gebel, E. B.; Machonkin, T. E.; Westler, W. M.; Markely, J. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 14581-14586.
20. Tan, M. L.; Kang, C.; Ichiye, T. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 2006, 62, 708-714.
21. Kennepohl, P.; Solomon, E. I. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 696-708.
22. Sigfridsson, E.; Olsson, M. H. M.; Ryde, U. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 2509-2519.
23. Stephens, P. J.; Jollie, D. R.; Warshel, A. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2491-2513.
24. The CP2K developers group, 2005: http://cp2k.berlios.de/. Vande-Vondele, J.; Krack, M.; Mohamed, F.; Parrinello, M.; Chassaing, T.; Hutter, J. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2005, 167, 103-128.
25. Tateyama, Y.; Blumberger, J.; Sprik, M.; Tavernelli, I. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 234505 (1-17).
26. Blumberger, J.; Sprik, M. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2006, 115, 113-126.
27. Blumberger, J.; Tavernelli, I.; Klein, M. L.; Sprik, M. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 064507 (1-12).
28. VandeVondele, J.; Sulpizi, M.; Sprik, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1936-1938.
29. 4 However, for our system, these energy differences are dominated by errors in the DFT description of the intermolecular interactions stabilizing the protein structure. The classical force field model, which has been designed for this purpose, is in fact much more reliable. Correcting for the difference between the DFT and classical model would therefore deteriorate rather than improve the accuracy of our results for the redox properties, which is why we have not applied such a procedure.
30. Day, M. W.; Hsu, B. T.; Joshua-Tor, L.; Park, J. B.; Zhou, Z. H.; Adams, M. W.; Rees, D. C. Protein Sci. 1992, 1, 1494-1507.
31. Case, D. A.; Darden, T. A.; Cheatham, T. E., III; Simmerling, C. L.; Wang, J.; Duke, R. E.; Luo, R.; Merz, K. M.; Wang, B.; Pearlman, D. A.; Crowley, M.; Brozell, S.; Tsui, V.; Gohlke, H.; Mongan, J.; Hornak, V.; Cui, G.; Beroza, P.; Schafmeister, C.; Caldwell, J. W.; Ross, W. S.; Kollman, P. A. AMBER 8, University of California, San Francisco, 2004.
32. Berendsen, H. J. C.; Grigera, J. R.; Straatsma, T. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 6269-6271.
33. Straatsma, T. P.; Berendsen, H. J. C. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 89, 5876-5886.
34. Bayly, C. I.; Cieplak, P.; Cornell, W. D.; Kollman, P. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 10269-10280.
35. Cornell, W. D.; Cieplak, P.; Bayly, C. I.; Kollman, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9620-9631.
36. Phillips, W. D.; Poe, M.; Weiher, J. F.; McDonald, C. C.; Lovenberg, W. Nature 1970, 227, 574-577.
37. Becke, A. D. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098-3100.
38. Lee, T. C.; Yang, W. T.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785-789.
39. The high spin multiplicity for the system discussed here might raise questions about the validity of our approximation to the exchange and correlation functional (BLYP). However, in our case both oxidized and reduced states have high multiplicity. Vacuum calculations for similar systems indicate that DFT can give quite good results in contrast to, for example, haemes, where high and low spin states are compared.
40. Lippert, G.; Hutter, J.; Parrinello, M. Mol. Phys. 1997, 92, 477-488.
41. VandeVondele, J.; Hutter, J. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 4365-4369.
42. Goedecker, S.; Teter, M.; Hutter, J. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 1703-1710.
43. Hartwigsen, C.; Goedecker, S.; Hutter, J. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 55, 3641-3662.
44. Blankman, J. I.; Shanazad, N.; Miller, C. J.; Guiles, R. D. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 14806-14812.
45. Fraga, E.; Webb, M. A.; Lopponow, G. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 3278-3287.
46. Simonson, T.; Perahia, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7987-8000.
47. Miyashita, O.; Okamura, M. Y.; Onuchic, J. N. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 1230-1241.
48. Basu, G.; Kitao, A.; Kuki, A.; Go, N. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 2076-2084.
49. Basu, G.; Kitao, A.; Kuki, A.; Go, N. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 2085-2094.
50. Miyashita, O.; Go, N. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 7516-7521.
51. Muegge, I.; Qi, P. X.; Wand, A. J.; Chu, Z. T.; Warshel, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 825-836.
52. Counterions contribute very little to the total reorganization energy (10% for CpRd and 6% for PfRd). Over the sampled time scale of 5 ns, none of them was seen to approach the metal center closer than 7 Å, which could perturb the metal coordination properties.
53. Yelle, R. B.; Park, N. S.; Ichiye, T. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 1995, 22, 154-167.
54. Park, I. Y.; Youn, B.; Harley, J. L.; Eidsness, M. K.; Smith, E.; Ichiye, T.; Kang, C J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 9, 423-428.
55. Mertz, E. L.; Krishtalik, L. I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 2081-2086.
56. Kennepohl, P.; Solomon, E. I. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 679-688.
57. Kennepohl, P.; Solomon, E. I. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 689-695.
58. Yang, X.; Wang, X. B.; Fuand, Y. J.; Wang, L. S. J. Phys. Chem. 2003, 107, 1703-1709.
59. Niu, S.; Wang, X. B.; Nichols, J. A.; Wang, L. S.; Ichiye, T. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 2898-2907.
60. Bair, R. A.; Goddard, W. A., III J. Am. Chem. Soc 1978, 100, 5669-5676.
61. Mouesca, J. M.; Chen, J. L.; Noodelman, L.; Bashford, D.; Case, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1994, 116, 11898-11914.
62. Koerner, J. B.; Ichiye, T. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 3633-3643.
63. Sundararajan, M.; Hillier, I. H.; Burton, N. A. J. Phys. Chem. 2006, 110, 785-790.