Electronic structure contributions to electron-transfer reactivity in iron-sulfur active sites: 3. Kinetics of electron transfer

Inorganic Chemistry

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 696-708

  Kennepohl, Pierre ^a   Solomon, Edward I ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RUBREDOXIN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; CONTROL SYSTEM; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; HYDROGEN BOND; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; PHASE SEPARATION; REACTION ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 0037429246     PISSN: 00201669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ic0203320     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Ratner, M. A. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1978, 14, 675-694.
2. Marcus, R. A.; Sutin, N. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1985, 811, 265-322.
3. Holm, R. H.; Kennepohl, P.; Solomon, E. I. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2239-2314.
4. Skourtis, S. S.; Beratan, D. N. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 2, 378-386.
5. Utimoto, K. New Challenges Org. Electrochem. 1998, 279-306.
6. Mataga, N.; Miyasaka, H. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1999, 107. 431-496.
7. Sutin, N. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1999, 106, 7-33.
8. Kuznetsov, A. M.; Ulstrup, J. Electrochim. Acta 2000, 45, 2339-2361.
9. Moser, C. C.; Page, C. C.; Chen, X.; Dutton, P. L. Subcell. Biochem. 2000, 35, 1-28.
10. Bellelli, A.; Brunori, M.; Brzezinski, P.; Wilson, M. T. Methods (San Diego) 2001, 24, 139-152.
11. Deaton, J. C.; Gebhard, M. S.; Koch, S. A.; Millar, M.; Solomon, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 6241-6243.
12. Deaton, J. C.; Gebhard, M. S.; Solomon, E. I. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 877-889.
13. Butcher, K. D.; Didziulis, S. V.; Briat, B.; Solomon, E. I. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 1626-1637.
14. Butcher, K. D.; Didziulis, S. V.; Briat, B.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 2231-2242.
15. Butcher, K. D.; Gebhard, M. S.; Solomon, E. I. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 2067-2074.
16. Gebhard, M. S.; Deaton, J. C.; Koch, S. A.; Millar, M.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 2217-2231.
17. Gebhard, M. S.; Koch, S. A.; Millar, M.; Devlin, F. J.; Stephens, P. J.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 1640-1649.
18. Lowery, M. D.; Guckert, J. A.; Gebhard, M. S.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 3012-3013.
19. Williams, K. R.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.; Solomon, E. I. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1997, 263, 315-321.
20. Rose. K.; Shadle, S. E.; Eidsness, M. K.; Kurtz, D. M.; Scott, R. A.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998. 120, 10743-10747.
21. Kennepohl, P.; Solomon. E. I. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42. 679-688.
22. Kennepohl, P.; Solomon, E. I. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 689-695.
23. Bond distances for tetrathiolate are average values for a series of ferrous (CSD: DOKPUO, LAJFUX, PAFVIB, PTHPFE10, VAPVUD, ZAGYIP) and ferric (CSD: BOSTOS, CANCUP, CANDAW, JURHIN, OXYSFEO10) structures.
24. Evans, D. J.; Hills, A.; Hughes, D. L.; Leigh, G. J. Acta Crystallogr. C: Cryst. Struct. Commun. 1990, C46, 1818-1821.
25. Ferrari, A.; Brainbanti, A.; Bigliardi, G. Acta Crystallogr. 1963, 16, 846-847.
26. Sigfridsson, E.; Olsson, M. H. M.; Ryde, U. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 5546-5552.
27. Im, S. G.; Sykes, A. G. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1996, 2219-2222.
28. Jensen, T. J.; Gray, H. B.; Ulstrup, J. J. Inorg. Biochem. 1999, 74, 181-181.
29. Te Velde, G.; Bickelhaupt, F. M.; Baerends, E. J.; Fonseca Guerra, C.; van Gisbergen, S. J. A.; Snijders, J. G.; Ziegler, T. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 931-967.
30. Versluis, L.; Ziegler, T. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 322-328.
31. Baerends, E. J.; Ellis, D. E.; Ros, P. Chem. Phys. 1973, 2, 41-51.
32. Te Velde, G.; Baerends, E. J. J. Comput. Phys. 1992, 99, 84-98.
33. Guerra, C. F.; Snijders, J. G.; Te Velde, G.; Baerends, E. J. Theor. Chem. Acc. 1998, 99, 391-403.
34. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Baboul, A. G.; Stefanov. B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Gonzalez, C.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, revision A.lx; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 2001.
35. Vosko, S. H.; Wilk, L.; Nusair, M. Can. J. Phys. 1980, 58, 1200-1211.
36. Becke, A. D. Phys. Rev. A: Gen. Phys. 1988, 38, 3098-3100.
37. Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Emzerhof, M. ACS Syrup. Ser. 1996, 629, 453-462.
38. Perdew, J. P. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 1986, 33, 8822.
39. Bader, R. F. W. Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory; Oxford University Press: New York, 1994.
40. The negative charge of these complexes in the gas phase contributes to the overestimate of the Fe-X bond distances. The deviation is larger for the tetrachloride, which is unsurprising because of the poorer charge distribution in this complex relative to the tetrathiolate.
41. Robertson, N. E.; Hidalgo, G. R. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 458-459.
42. The relationship between the distorting force and the bond changes upon oxidation for the Morse-type potential is compared to that occurring in a harmonic field in the Supporting Information. The linear relationship in a harmonic field is dampened by the anharmonicity in the Morse potential; this deviation increases as the distorting force increases.
43. Newton, M. D.; Ohta, K.; Zhong, E. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 2317-2326.
44. Newton, M. D. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2000, 77, 255-263.
45. Newton, M. D. Jerusalem Syrup. Quantum Chem. Biochem. 1986, 19. 305-314.
46. Newton, M. D. Jerusalem Syrup. Quantum Chem. Biochem. 1990, 22, 157-170.
47. Newton, M. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 3049-3056.
48. Newton, M. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 3734-3739.
49. Liang, C. X.; Newton, M. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 2855-2866.
50. x2-y2 orbital is lowest in energy and becomes the RAMO.
51. Eaton, W. A.; Lovenberg, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 7195.
52. Eaton, W. A.; Lovenberg, W. In Iron-Sulfur Proteins; Academic Press: New York, 1973; Vol. II, pp 131-162.
53. The RAMO was considered to point towards the surface of the protein in ref 18. The full calculation of the active-site region provides the correct orientation of the RAMO with respect to the protein structure.
54. Beratan, D. N.; Betts, J. N.; Onuchic, J. N. Science 1991, 252, 1285-1288.
55. Tominaga, K.; Walker, G. C.; Kang, T. J.; Barbara, P. F.; Fonseca, T. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 10485-10492.
56. Raineri, F. O.; Friedman, H. L. In Electron Transfer - From Isolated Molecules to Biomolecules; John Wiley & Sons. Inc: New York, 1999; Vol. 107, Part 2, pp 81 -189.
57. Basilevsky, M. V.; Parsons, D. F.; Vener, M. V. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 1103-1114.
58. Yoshihara, K.; Nagasawa, Y.; Yartsev, A.; Johnson. A. E.; Tominaga, K. J. Mol. Liq. 1995, 65-6, 59-64.
59. Yoshihara, K.; Tominaga, K.; Nagasawa, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1995, 68, 696-712.
60. Rips, I.; Jortner, J. Jerusalem Syrup. Quantum Chem. Biochem. 1990, 22, 293-299.
61. Rips, I.; Klafter, J.; Jortner, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 8557-8561.
62. Rips, I.; Klafter, J.; Jortner, J. Photochem. Energy Convers., Proc. Int. Conf. Photochem. Convers. Storage Solar Energy, 7th 1989, 1-22.
63. Rips, I.; Jortner, J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1987, 133, 411-414.
64. Sigfridsson, E.; Olsson, M. H. M.; Ryde, U. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 2509-2519.
65. Cambray, J.; Lane. R. W.; Wedd, A. G.; Johnson, R. W.; Holm, R. H. Inorg. Chem. Inorg. Chem. 1977, 16, 2565-2571.
66. Lane, R. W.; Ibers, J. A.; Frankel, R. B.; Holm, R. H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1975, 72, 2868-2872.
67. Lane. R. W.; Ibers, J. A.; Frankel, R. B.; Papaefthymiou, G. C.; Holm, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 84-98.
68. Papaefthymiou, G.; Frankel, R. B.; Lane, R. W.; Holm, R. H. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 1976, 21, 317-317.
69. Blankman, J. I.; Shahzad, N.; Miller, C. J.; Guiles, R. D. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 14806-14812.
70. Fraga, E.; Webb, M. A.; Loppnow, G. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 3278-3287.
71. Some additional factors further lower the distorting force in the tetrathiolate. The electrostatic charge model should be redistributed within the ligand, and the model assumes that only a single distorting mode is consequential.
72. Recent studies have suggested that structural rearrangement of the active site could be sufficient to allow direct access to the iron. The crystallographic data used to support this proposal show a water molecule near the active site but still ∼4 Å away from the iron itself. The water is in close contact with one of the surface cysteinates and would ultimately allow for effective solvent-mediated electron transfer through the cysteinate ligand.
73. The importance of the H-bond pathways can be seen by recalculating the rate constant using the CEM structure where the active-site H-bonds have been broken. In this case, the rate constant drops by approximately 30%.
74. Yang, Y.; Beck, B. W.; Shenoy, V. S.; Ichiye, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 7439-7444.