National Parliaments in the European Union: Are There Any Benefits to Integration?

European Law Journal

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 173-195

  Duina, Francesco ^a   Oliver, Michael J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247675796     PISSN: 13515993     EISSN: 14680386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00256.x     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. AFX News (1996), ‘Dutch Government Plans to Ban Cartels, Regulate Mergers and Acquisitions’, May 3.
2. ANP English News Bulletin (1996), ‘Drafts Law Bans Cartels and Created Monopolies Commission’, May 2.
3. ANP English News Bulletin (1997a), ‘EU Wins More Powers in Investigating Mergers’, 28 April.
4. ANP English News Bulletin (1997b), ‘Wijers Makes More Concessions to Anti-Cartel Legislation’, March 13.
5. Agostini, M. V. (2001), ‘The Role of National Parliaments in the Future of the EU’, The International Spectator, XXXVI(4), 1–13.
6. Amato, G. (1996), ‘The Impact of Europe on National Policies: Italian Anti-Trust Policy’, in Y. Mény, P. Muller and J. L. Quernome (eds), Adjusting to Europe: The Impact of the European Union on National Institutions and Policies (Routledge), 157–174.
7. Associated Press (1990), ‘Italy Passes Its First Antitrust Law’, September 27.
8. Bartocci, B. (1994), ‘The Italian Merger Control Regulation’, The Antitrust Bulletin Summer, 541–598.
9. Bennett, C. (1991a), ‘What is Policy Convergence and What Causes It?’British Journal of Political Science, 21(3), 215–233.
10. Bennett, C. (1991b), ‘How States Utilize Foreign Evidence’, Journal of Public Policy, 11(1), 31–54.
11. Bomberg, E. and Peterson, J. (2000), ‘Policy Transfer and Europeanization: Passing the Heineken Test?’, Queen's Papers on Europeanization 2.
12. Borrás, S. and Jacobsson, K. (2004), ‘The Open Method of Co-ordination and New Governance Patterns in the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 185–208.DOI: 10.1080/1350176042000194395
13. Brown, D. (1996), ‘Dutch to Act over Cartels’, Financial Times, May 4.
14. Brown, S. S., Angel, D. and Derr, P. G. (1996), Effective Environmental Regulation: Learning from Poland's Experience (Praeger).
15. Brusse, W. A. and Griffiths, R. (1997), ‘Early Cartel Legislation and Cartel Policy in the Netherlands: In Memoriam: The Economics Competition Act (1956–1997)’, Acta Politica, 32(4), 375–405.
16. Brusse, W. A. and Griffiths, R. (1998), ‘Paradise Lost or Paradise Regained? Cartel Policy and Cartel Legislation in the Netherlands’, in S. Martin (ed.), Competition Policies in Europe (Elsevier), 15–39.
17. Cameron, D. (1998), ‘Creating Supranational Authority in Monetary and Exchange Rate Policy: The Sources and Effects of EMU’, in W. Sandholtz and A. S. Sweet (eds), European Integration and Supranational Governance (Oxford University Press), 188–216.
18. Cameron, D. (2003), ‘The Europeanization of Employment Policy and the Open Method of Coordination: Origins, Development, and Impact.’ Paper presented to the workshop on the Open Method of Coordination and Economic Governance in the EU, Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies, Harvard University, April.
19. Capotorti, F. et al. (1989), Il Fenomeno delle Concentrazioni di Imprese nel Diritto Interno e Internazionale: Atti e Documenti del Convegno di Napoli del 29 Aprile 1988 (Cedam).
20. De Búrca, G. and Zeitlin, J. (2003), ‘Constitutionalising the Open method of Coordination: What Should the Convention Propose?’, Center For European Policy Studies, Brief No. 31, March.
21. De La Porte, C. (2002), ‘Is the Open Method of Coordination Appropriate for Organizing Activities at European Level in Sensitive Policy Areas?’, European Law Journal, 8(1), 38–58.DOI: 10.1111/1468-0386.00141
22. De La Porte, C. and Nanz, P. (2004), ‘The OMC—A Deliberative-Democratic Mode of Governance? The Cases of Employment and Pensions’, Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 267–288.DOI: 10.1080/1350176042000194430
23. De Nicola, A. (1991a), ‘Analisi del Nuovo Formulario da Riempire in Caso di Concentrazioni’, Il Sole 24 Ore, June 13.
24. De Nicola, A. (1991b), ‘Dall’Authority le Prime Regole sulla Fusione Doc’, Il Sole 24 Ore, 23 October.
25. Dolowitz, D. and Marsh, D. (1996), ‘Who Learn What From Whom? A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature’, Political Studies, 44, 343–357.
26. Drahos, M. (2001), Convergence of Competition Laws and Policies in the European Community (Kluwer Law International).
27. Duffy, K. (2002), EAPN Follow Up on the National Action Plans on Inclusion (EAPN).
28. Duina, F. (2003), ‘National Legislatures in Common Markets: Autonomy in the European Union and Mercosur’, in T. V. Paul, G. J. Ikenberry and J. A. Hall (eds), The Nation State in Question (Princeton University Press), 183–212.
29. Elias, P. E. M. and Cohn, A. (2003), ‘Health Reform in Brazil: Lessons to Consider’, American Journal of Public Health, 931, 44–48.
30. Esping-Andersen, G.(ed.) (1996), Welfare States in Transition (Sage).
31. European Commission (1999), XXVIIIth Report on Competition Policy: 1998 (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
32. European Commission (2001), The Draft Joint Report on Social Inclusion (COM(2001) 565 final) (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
33. European Commission (2002a), Taking Stock Of Five Years Of The European Employment Strategy (COM(2002) 416 final) (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
34. European Commission (2002b), Taking Stock Of Five Years Of The European Employment Strategy— Technical Analysis (Supporting COM(2002) 416 final) (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
35. European Commission (2003), The Draft Joint Report on Social Inclusion (COM(2003) 773 final) (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
36. European Information Service (1995), ‘Competition: EU Court Rejects Dutch Construction Appeal’, February 25.
37. European Report (2001), ‘Social Affairs: Poverty Action Plans First Step Towards EU Strategy’. October 10.
38. European Report (2002), ‘National Action Plans on Poverty Discussed’, October 23.
39. European Social Network (2003), ‘Draft Report on the National Action Plans for Social Inclusion’. Available at: .
40. EuroWatch (1994), ‘Dutch Government Proposes Rules in Line with EU Competition Regulations’, 5(23).
41. EuroWatch (1996), ‘Business Law Developments from the Member States’, March 8.
42. Fignani, A. (1992), ‘Gli Obblighi delle Imprese in Base alla Legge 287/90’, Il Sole 24 Ore, April 11.
43. Foden, D. and Magnusson, L. (eds) (2003), Five Years Experience of the Luxembourg Employment Strategy (ETUI).
44. France (2002), Evaluation de la Strategie Europeenne pour l’Emploi.
45. Franco, D. (2001), ‘Italy: A Never-Ending Pension Reform’. In M. Feldstein and S. Horst (eds), Social Security Pension Reform in Europe (The University of Chicago Press).
46. Germany (2002), Assessment of the Impact of National Policies in connection with the European Employment Strategy.
47. Grabbe, H. (2001), ‘How does Europeanization Affect CEE Governance? Conditionality, Diffusion and Diversity Journal of European Public Policy, 8(6), 1013–1031.
48. Gray, J. (1998), ‘The Youngest Watchdog Shows Its Teeth’, Financial Times, November 5.
49. Héritier, A. (2002), ‘New Modes of Governance in Europe: Policy-Making Without Legislating’, in A. Héritier (ed.), Common Goods: Reinventing European Integration Governance (Rowman & Littlefield), 185–206.
50. Hodson, D. and Maher, I. (2001), ‘The Open Method as a New Mode of Governance: The Case of Soft Economic Policy Co-ordination’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(4), 719–746.
51. International Monetary Fund (1995), Direction of Trade Statistics Yearbook 1995 (IMF).
52. International Monetary Fund (2000), Direction of Trade Statistics Yearbook 2000 (IMF).
53. International Social Security Association (1996), Developments and Trends in Social Security, 1993–95 (ISSA).
54. Ireland (2003), National Action Plan against Poverty and Social Exclusion 2003–1905.
55. Kuck-Schneenmelcher, D. and Müllenmeister-Faust, U. (2003), ‘Germany's NAP/Incl: Strategy and Application’, EAPN Network News, 100, May.
56. La Republica (2003), ‘Senado Vota Ley que Controla Fabricacion de Refrescos’, May 4.
57. Lavenex, S. (2002), ‘EU Enlargement and the Challenge of Policy Transfer: the Case of Refugee Policy’, Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies, 28(4), 701–722.
58. Levy, D. A. (1997), ‘Regulating Digital Broadcasting in Europe: The Limits of Policy Convergence’, West European Politics 20(4), 24–42.
59. Mancino, N. (2000), ‘Indirizzo di Saluto’, in Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri (ed.), Concorrenza e Autorità Antitrust: Un Bilancio a 10 Anni dalla Legge, Atti del Convegno Roma, 9–10 Ottobre 2000 (Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri: Dipartimento per l’Informazione e l’Editoria), 9–12.
60. Mangan, G. (2003), Presentation at NAP Social Inclusion Forum (Kilmainham, January 30). Available at: .
61. Mazey, S. (1998), ‘The European Union and Women's Rights: From the Europeanization of National Agendas to the Nationalization of a European Agenda’, Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 131–152.
62. Mèny, Y., Muller, P. and Quernome, J. L. (eds) (1996), Adjusting to Europe: The Impact of the European Union on National Institutions and Policies (Routledge).
63. McKay, B. (1999), ‘Italy Finds Coke Guilty of Anticompetitive Moves’, Wall Street Journal, December 20.
64. Mosher, J. and Trubek, D. M. (2003), ‘Alternative Approaches to Governance in the EU: EU Social Policy and the European Employment Strategy’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(1), 63–88.
65. Munari, F. (1991), ‘La Legge 287/1990 ed i Suoi Rapporti col Diritto Comunitario: Primi Appunti’, Diritto Del Commercio Internazionale, 173–210.
66. News Press (2003), ‘Exclusion: Rendre Effectif la Politique d’Aide aux plus Fragiles’, March 25.
67. OECD (1999), OECD Reviews of Regulatory Reform: Regulatory Reform in the Netherlands—Government Capacity to Ensure High Quality Regulation in the Netherlands (OECD Publications).
68. Ottervanger, T. R. and Van Der Voorde, S. J. (2002), Competition law of the European Union and the Netherldands (Kluwer Law International).
69. Padgett, S. (2003), ‘Between synthesis and emulation: EU policy transfer in the power sector Journal of European Public Policy, 10(2), 227–245.
70. Palmer, E. (2001), ‘Swedish Pension Reform—How Did It Evolve and What Does It Mean for the Future?’, in Feldstein, M. and Horst, S. (eds), Social Security Pension Reform in Europe (The University of Chicago Press), 171–205.
71. Portugal (2002), Evaluation of the Impact of the European Employment Strategy—Final Report (Summary).
72. Portuguese Ministry of Labour and Social Security (2002), ‘Homelessness in Europe FEANSTA Newsletter, 16–17.
73. Raunio, T. (1999), ‘Always One Step Behind? National Legislatures and the European Union’, Government and Opposition, 34(2), 180–202.
74. Raunio, T. (2004), ‘Two Steps Forward, One Step Back? National Legislatures in the Draft EU Constitution’. Paper presented at the conference Towards a European Constitution, The Federal Trust, London (July 1–2).
75. Raunio, T. and Hix, S. (2000), ‘Backbenchers Learn to Fight Back: European Integration and Parliamentary Government’, West European Politics, 23(4), 142–168.
76. Regent, S. (2003), ‘The Open Method of Coordination: A New Supranational Form of Governance?’European Law Journal, 9(2), 190–214.
77. Rose, R. (1991), ‘What is Lesson-Drawing?’, Journal of Public Policy 11(1), 3–30.
78. Schmidt, V. A. (1999), ‘European ‘Federalism’ and its Encroachments on National Institutions’, Publius, 29(1), 19–44.
79. Silva, F. (2000), ‘La Prospettiva Economica: Competizione, Collusione e Potere di Mercato’, in Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri (ed), Concorrenza e Autorità Antitrust: Un Bilancio a 10 Anni dalla Legge, Atti del Convegno Roma, 9–10 Ottobre (Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri: Dipartimento per l’Informazione e l’Editoria), 33–67.
80. Spain (2002), Assessment of the European Employment Strategy, Final Report (Summary).
81. Spain (2003), Second National Action Plan on Social Inclusion of the Kingdom of Spain 2003–1905.
82. Stone, D. (1999), ‘Learning Lessons and Transferring Policy across Time, Space and Disciplines’, Politics, 19(1), 51–59.
83. Trubek, D. M. and Mosher, J. (2003), ‘New Governance, Employment Policy and the European Social Model’, in J. Zeitlin, D. M. Trubek (eds), Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy: European and American Experiments (Oxford University Press), 59–87.
84. The Economist (1995), ‘Call it Authority?’, April 8.
85. The Economist (2002), ‘A Fine Place to Be’, May 4.
86. The Netherlands (2002), Dutch Experiences with the European Employment Strategy.
87. Vandenbroucke, F. (2001), ‘Open Co-ordination and Sustainable Social Justice in Europe’. Closing address at the conference ‘Towards a New Architecture for Social Protection in Europe? A Broader Perspective of Pension Policies’, October 19–20. Available at: .
88. Waarden, F., Van and Drahos, M. (2002), ‘Courts and (Epistemic) Communities in the Convergence of Competition Policies’, Journal of European Public Policy, 9(6), 913–934.
89. Wallace, H. (2000), ‘An Institutional Anatomy with Five Policy Modes’, in H. Wallace, and W. Wallace (eds), Policy-Making in the European Union, 4th edn (Oxford University Press).
90. Weiler, J. H. H., Haltern, U.R. and Mayer, F.C. (1995), ‘European Democracy and its Critique’, 18 (special issue) West European Politics 4–39.
91. Wiener, A. and Neunreither, K. (2000), ‘Introduction: Amsterdam and Beyond’, in K. Neunreither and A. Wiener (eds), European Integration After Amsterdam: Institutional Dynamics Prospects for Democracy (Oxford University Press), 1–11.
92. Working Group (2001), European Commission: Involving Experts in the Process of National Policy Convergence (Report by Working Group 4a) June. Available at: .
93. Wyles, J. (1990), ‘Curbing Cartels: Italy's First Antitrust Law Will Loosen Grip of Public and Private Industrial Power’, Financial Times, October 23.