Testing the efficacy of team teaching

Learning Environments Research

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 53-65

  Carpenter II, Dick M ^a   Crawford, Lindy ^a   Walden, Ron ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Co teaching; Collaborative teaching; Cooperative teaching; Post secondary teaching; Team teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247634603     PISSN: 13871579     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10984-007-9019-y     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anderson, R. S., & Speck, B. W. (1998). Oh what a difference a team makes: Why team teaching makes a difference. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 671-686.
2. Bord-Bowman, P. (1973). A comparative study in the teaching of Spanish through team teaching and supervised independent study. Modern Language Journal, 57, 199-204.
3. Colarulli, G. C., & McDaniel, E. A. (1990). Interdisciplinary general education: Five ways it promotes good freshman teaching and learning. Journal of the Freshman Year Experience, 2(1), 107-117.
4. Cornett, J. D. (1970). Effect of a team approach in achieving the objectives of an introductory course in education. Journal of Educational Research, 63, 222-224.
5. Crow, J., & Smith, L. (2003). Using co-teaching as a means of facilitating interprofessional collaboration in health and social care. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 17(1), 45-55.
6. Davis, J. R. (1995). Interdisciplinary and team teaching. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx.
7. Deighton, L. C. (1971). The encyclopedia of education. New York:Macmillan.
8. Dupuis, V. L., & Woerdehoff, F. J. (1967). Team teaching in teacher education: A study of the differences in student achievement as determined by single-instructor and team-teaching instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 61, 132-136.
9. Easterby-Smith, M., & Olve, N. G. (1984). Team teaching: Making management education more student centered. Management Education and Development, 15, 221-236.
10. Fitzgerald, S. M., & Jurs, S. J. (1996). A model predicting statistics achievement among graduate students. College Student Journal, 30, 361-367.
11. Fu, G. S., & Chase, M. (1991). Team teaching as a form of staff development: When are two teachers better than one? Guidelines, 13(2), 81-87.
12. Garner, A. E., & Thillen, C. (1977). Is your school of nursing ready to implement interdisciplinary team teaching? Journal of Nursing Education, 16(7), 27-30.
13. George, M. A., & Davis-Wiley, P. (2000). Team teaching a graduate course. College Teaching, 48(2), 75-81.
14. Gurman, E. B. (1989). The effect of prior test exposure on performance in two instructional settings. Journal of Psychology, 123, 275-278.
15. Hatcher, T., & Hinton, B. (1996). Graduate students' perceptions of university team teaching. College Student Journal, 30, 367-377.
16. Hecht, J. B., Roberts, N. K., & Schoon, P. L. (1996). Teacher teams and computer technology: Do combined strategies maximize student achievement? Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28, 318-328.
17. Hong, E., & Karstensson, L. (2002). Antecedents of state test anxiety. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 348-368.
18. Hughes, C. E., & Murwaski, W. A. (2001). Lessons from another field: Applying coteaching strategies to gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 195-209.
19. Jurena, D. P., & Daniels, C. N. (1997, May). Two heads are better than one: Team teaching in the information age. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Nebraska Library Association, Crete, NE.
20. Luckner, J. L. (1999). An examination of two coteaching classrooms. American Annals of the Deaf, 144(1), 24-34.
21. McKinley, B. (1996). An example of team-taught inter-disciplinary classrooms. North Branch, NJ, Raritan Valley Community College.
22. Morlock, H. C., Gaeddret, W. P., McCormick, N. B., Merens, M. R., Shaffer, L. C., & Zandi, T. (1988). A rotational format for team teaching introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 15, 144-145.
23. Needleman, J., & Leland, B. (1973). The team teaching alternative. CEA Forum, 4(2), 2-4.
24. Norussis, M. J. (1985). SPSS-X advanced statistics guide. New York:McGraw Hill.
25. Nudelman, J., & Schlosser, A. H. (1.976). A team teaching strategy for composition. Teaching English in the Two Year College, 2, 167-172.
26. Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2000). Attitudes toward statistics assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 321-340.
27. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Slate, J. R., Paterson, F. R. A., Watson, M. H., & Schwartz, R. A. (2000). Factors associated with achievement in educational research courses. Research in the Schools, 7(1), 53-65.
28. Paul, M. L., & McAndrews, L. J. (1991). Team teaching the voices of Central America. College Teaching, 39(1), 8-11.
29. Pugach, M. C., Johnson, L. J., & Lilly, S. (1995). Collaborative practitioners, collaborative schools.
30. Denver, CO: Love. Quinn, S. L. (1984). Team teaching: An alternative to lecture fatigue. Innovative Abstracts, 6'(34)
31. npn. Richardson, A. (1993). School-based teams help improve school learning environments. Schools in the Middle, 2(4), 26-29.
32. Rinn, F. J., & Weir, S. B. (1984). Yea, team. Improving College and University Teaching, 32(1), 5-10.
33. Roth, W.-M, Tobin, K., & Zimmermann, A. (2002). Coteaching/ cogenerative dialoguing: Leaning environments research as classroom praxis. Learning Environments Research, 5, 1-28.
34. Rumsey, D. J. (1999). Cooperative teaching opportunities for introductory statistics teachers. Mathematics Teacher, 92, 734-737.
35. Schram, C. M. (1996). A meta-analysis of gender differences in applied statistics achievement. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27(1), 55-70.
36. Schustereit, R. S. (1980). Team teaching and academic improvement. Improving College and University Teaching, 28(2), 85-89.
37. Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum.
38. Winn, J. A., & Messenheimer-Young, T. (1995). Team teaching at the university level: What we have learned. Teacher Education and Special Education, 18, 223-229.
39. Zitelli, P. A. (1967). An evaluation of a cooperative teaching method in basic physical science as required of non-science majors. Science Education, 51, 295-298.