Teacher teams and computer technology: Do combined strategies maximize student achievement?

Journal of Research on Computing in Education

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 318-328

  Hecht, Jeffrey B ^a   Roberts, Nicole K ^b   Schoon, Perry L ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Achievement; Teaching methods; Team teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007881930     PISSN: 08886504     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08886504.1996.10782168     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Becker, H.J. (1991). How computers are used in United States schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7, 385-406.
2. Becker, H.J. (1987). The effects of computer use on children’s learning: Limitations on past research and a working model for new research. Peabody Journal of Education, 64(1), 81-110.
3. Boloz, S.A., & Blessing, C. (1994). Walking on sacred ground: A Navajo school within a school model. Ganado, AZ: Ganado Primary School. (ERIC ED 367 515)
4. Boyer, E. (1985). High school. New York: Harper & Row.
5. Brophy, J., & Hannon, R (1984). The future of microcomputers in the classroom. Occasional Paper No. 76, Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.
6. Carnegie Task Force on Teaching as a Profession. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the twenty-first century. New York: Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.
7. Costello, R.W. (1987). Improving student achievement by overcoming teacher isolation. The Clearing House, 61(2), 91-94.
8. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Columbia Teachers College Press.
9. Hecht, J.B., & Dwyer, D.J. (1993). Structured computer learning activities at school and participation in out-of-school structured activities. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(1), 70-82.
10. Hecht, J.B., Dwyer, D.J., Roberts, N.K., Schoon, PL., & Fansler, G. (1994). Project Homeroom, Project Schoolroom, and regular school: Innovations in team teaching, interdisciplinary learning, and the use of technology. Normal, IL: Illinois State University, Technological Innovations in Educational Research Laboratory.
11. Hecht, J.B., Dwyer, D.J., Roberts, N.K., Schoon, P.L., Kelly, J., Parsons, J., Nietzke, T., & Virlee, M. (1993). Project Homeroom, second year experiences: A final report on the project in the Maine East High School, New Trier High School, and Amos Alonzo Stagg High School. Normal, IL: Illinois State University, Technological Innovations in Educational Research Laboratory. (ERIC ED 366 638)
12. Hecht, J.B., Dwyer, D.J., Wills, S., Kelly, J., Parsons, J., Nietzke, T., & Virlee, M. (1992). Project Homeroom, first year experiences: A status report on the project in the Maine East High School, New Trier High School, and Amos Alonzo Stagg High School. Normal, IL: Illinois State University, Technological Innovations in Educational Research Laboratory. (ERIC ED 352 029)
13. Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow’s teacher: A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI: Author.
14. Kosma, R.B., & Croninger, R.G. (1992). Technology and the fate of at-risk students. Education and Urban Society, 24(4), 440-453.
15. Lundeen, C, & Lundeen, D.J. (1993, November). Effectiveness of mainstreaming with collaborative teaching. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Anaheim, CA. (ERIC ED 368 127)
16. Meichtry, Y.J. (1990, October). Teacher collaboration: The effects of interdisciplinary teaming on teacher interactions and classroom practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. (ERIC ED 326 499)
17. Meyer, J. A. (1969). Salvaging team teaching. Clearing House, 44(4), 203-205.
18. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
19. Niemiec, R.P., & Walberg, H.J. (1985). Computers and achievement in the elementary schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, 435-440.
20. Persell, C.H., & Cookson, P.W. (1987). Microcomputers and elite boarding schools: Educational innovation and social reproduction. Sociology of Education, 60(4), 123-134.
21. Riel, M. (1989). The impact of computers in classrooms. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22(2) 180-189.
22. Rockman, S. (1993). Asking the right questions. The American School Board Journal, 180(3), 29-31.
23. Ryan, A.W. (1991). Meta-analysis of achievement effects of microcomputer applications in elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(2), 161-184.
24. Schmuck, R.A., & Runkel, P.J. (1985). The handbook of organization development in schools. Palo Alto, CA: May field Publishing Company.
25. Task Force on Federal Elementary and Secondary Education Policy. (1983). Making the grade. New York: The Fund.
26. Whitford, B.L., & Kyle, D.W. (1984, April). Interdisciplinary teaming: Initiating change in a middle school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC ED 263 672)