Typology and language acquisition: The case of relative clauses

Typology and Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 19-37

  Comrie, Bernard ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY ANTHROPOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85065064997     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (16)

1. Cole, Peter 1976 An apparent asymmetry in the formation of relative clauses in Modern Hebrew. In: Peter Cole (ed.), Studies in Modern Hebrew Syntax and Semantics, 231-247. Amsterdam: North-Holland
2. Comrie, Bernard 1984 Why linguists need language acquirers. In: William E. Rutherford (ed.), Language Universals and Second Language Acquisition, 11-29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
3. Comrie, Bernard 1989 Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell/Chicago: University of Chicago Press
4. Comrie, Bernard 1998a Attributive clauses in Asian languages: Towards an areal typology. In: Winfried Boeder, Christoph Schroeder, Karl Heinz Wagner, and Wolfgang Wildgen (eds.), Sprache in Raum und Zeit, In memoriam Johannes Bechert, Band 2: Beiträge zur empirischen Sprachwissenschaft, 51-60. Tübingen: Gunter Narr
5. Comrie, Bernard 1998b Rethinking the typology of relative clauses. Language Design 1: 59-86
6. Comrie, Bernard 1999 Relative clauses: Structure and typology on the periphery of standard English. In: Peter Collins and David Lee (eds.), The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston, 81-91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
7. Fiorentino, Giuliana 1999 Relativa debole. Sintassi, uso, storia in Italiano. Milano: Franco Angeli
8. Gass, Susan 1979 Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning 29: 327-344
9. Haig, John H. 1996 Subjacency and Japanese grammar: A functional account. Studies in Language 20: 53-92
10. Hale, Kenneth 1976 The adjoined relative clause in Australian languages. In: R.M.W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, 78-105. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies
11. Keenan, Edward L., and Bernard Comrie 1977 Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63-99
12. Lehmann, Christian 1984 Der Relativsatz: Typologie seiner Strukturen, Theorie seiner Funktionen, Kompendium seiner Grammatik. Tübingen: Gunter Narr
13. Matsumoto, Yoshiko 1997 Noun-Modifying Constructions in Japanese: A Frame Semantic Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
14. Miller, James 1993 The grammar of Scottish English. In: James Milroy and Lesley Milroy (eds.), Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles, 99-138. London: Longman
15. Sankoff, Gillian, and Penelope Brown 1976 On the origin of syntax in discourse: A case study of Tok Pisin relatives. Language 52: 631-666
16. Sheldon, Amy 1974 The Acquisition of Relative Clauses in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club