Evaluation of an accelerated aging medium for acrylic bone cement based on analysis of nanoindentation measurements on laboratory-prepared and retrieved specimens

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 544-550

  Lewis, Gladius ^a   Xu, Jie ^a   Dunne, Nicholas ^b   Daly, Catherine ^b   Orr, John ^b  

^a University of Memphis ^*  (United States)

^b QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bone cement; Mechanical properties; Nanotechnology

Indexed keywords

ACRYLICS; AGING OF MATERIALS; ELASTIC MODULI; HIP PROSTHESES; NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY; NANOINDENTATION;

INDENTING FORCE; KNEE JOINT REPLACEMENTS; NANOINDENTATION MEASUREMENTS;

BONE CEMENT;

ACRYLIC CEMENT; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; PALACOS;

AGING; ARTICLE; EVALUATION; FORCE; HARDNESS; IMMERSION; IN VIVO STUDY; LABORATORY; LITERATURE; MEASUREMENT; SIMULATION; TIME; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; YOUNG MODULUS;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE CEMENTS; ELASTICITY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MATERIALS TESTING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; SOLUTIONS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34247603907     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30695     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Jaffe WL, Rose RM, Radin EL. On the stability of the mechanical properties of self curing acrylic bone cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974;56:1171-1174.
2. Topoleski LDT, Vesnovsky O, Ducheyne P. The fracture toughness of PMMA bone cement aged in saline at body temperature for 12.5 years. In: Transactions of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, Tampa, FL, April 24-27, 2002. p 391.
3. Nottrott M, Moelster AO, Moldestad I, Gjerdet NR. Short and long term changes of mechanical properties of a bone cement under physiological conditions. In: Transactions of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, CA, March 7-10, 2004. p 1522.
4. Aldinger PK, Jones B, Thomas R, Margerrison E, Salehi A. Effect of 5-year realtime aging on chemical and mechanical properties of bone cement. In: Transactions of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, Memphis, TN, April 27-30, 2005. p 36.
5. Davies J, Harris W. Severe weakness of bone cement retrieved after in vivo service in man. In: Transactions of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, 1989. p 667.
6. Dunne N, Leonard D, Daly C, McHenry G, Orr J. Assessment of the mechanical properties of retrieved self-curing acrylic bone cement. In: Transactions of the Seventh World Biomaterials Congress, Sydney, May 17-21, 2004. p 495.
7. Hughes K, Ries MD, Pruitt LA. Structural degradation of acrylic bone cements due to in vivo and simulated aging. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;65:126-135.
8. Pruitt L, Al-Marashi L. Young E, Petrie TA, Hetheringion A, Goldstein P, Ebenstein D, Ries M. Evaluation of mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement from hip arthroplasty revision surgery. In: Transactions of the Seventh World Biomaterials Congress, Sydney, May 17-21, 2004. p 1468.
9. Ries MD, Young E, Al-Marashi L, Goldstein P, Hetherington A, Petri T, Pruitt L. In vivo behavior of acrylic bone cement in total hip arthroplasty. Biomaterials 2006;27:256-261.
10. Gomoll AH, Thornhill TS. Time and storage dependent changes in mechanical properties of bone cement. In: Transactions of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Orlando, FL, March 12-15, 2000. p 0220.
11. Herman JH, Wendy WG, Anderson D, Appel AM, Hopson N. Polymethylmethacrylate-induced release of bone-resorbing factors. J Bone Joint Surg 1989;71:1530-1541.
12. Coury AJ, Levy RJ, McMillin R, Pathak Y, Ratner RD, Schoen FJ, Williams DF, Williams RL. Degradation of materials in the biological environment. Biomater Sci 1996;11:243-248.
13. Malchau H, Herberts P, Esler T, Garelick G, Soderman P. The Swedish total hip replacement register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84 (Suppl 2):2-20.
14. El-Warrak AO, Olmstead M, Schneider R, Meinel L, Bettschart-Wolfisberger R, Akens MK, Auer J, von Rechenberg B. An experimental animal model of aseptic loosening of hip prostheses in sheep to study early biochemical changes at the interface membrane. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004;5:7.
15. Lewis G. Properties of acrylic bone cement: State-of-the-art review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appi Biomater 1997;38:155-182.
16. Giddings VL, Kurtz SM, Jewett CW, Foulds JR, Edidin AA. A small punch test technique for characterizing the elastic modulus and fracture behavior of PMMA bone cement used in total joint replacement. Biomaterials 2001;22:1875-1881.
17. Fan Z, Rho J-Y. Effects of viscoelasticity and time-independent plasticity on nanoindentation measurements of human cortical bone. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67:208-214.
18. Ebenstein DM, King K, Pruitt LA. A nanoindentation technique for measuring the mechanical properties of finger joint cartilage. In: Transactions of 29th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, Reno, NV, April 30-May 3, 2003. p 718.
19. Ho SP, Goodis H, Balooch M, Nonomura G, Marshall SJ, Marshall G. The effect of sample preparation technique on determination of structure and nanomechanical properties of human cementum hard tissue. Biomaterials 2004;25:4847-4857.
20. Ho E, Marcolongo M. Effect of coupling agents on the local mechanical properties of bioactive denial composites by the nano-indentation technique. Dent Mater 2005;21:656-664.
21. Park K, Mishra S, Lewis G, Losby J, Fan Z, Park JB. Quasi-static and dynamic nanoindentation studies on highly cross-linked ultra-high-molecular- weight polyethylene. Biomaterials 2004;25:2427-2436.
22. Wright-Charlesworth DD, Miller DM, Miskioglu I, King JA. Nanoindentation of injection molded PLA and self-reinforced composite PLA after in vitro conditioning for three months. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:388-396.
23. Lewis G, Xu J, Dunne N, Daly C, Orr J. Critical comparison of two methods for the determination of nanomechanical properties of a material: Application to synthetic and natural biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006 78B:312-317.
24. De Santis R, Mollica F, Ambrosio L, Nicolais L, Ronca D. Dynamic mechanical behavior of PMMA based bone cements in wet environment. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003;14:583-594.
25. Loubet JL, Oliver WC, Lucas BN. Measurement of the loss tangent of low-density polyethylene with a nanoindentation technique. J Mater Res 2000;15:1195-1198.
26. White CC, VanLandingham MR, Drzal PL, Chang N-K, Chang S-H. Viscoelastic characterization of polymers using instrumented indentation. II. Dynamic testing. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 2005;43:1812-1814.
27. Bull SJ. Extracting hardness and Young's modulus from load-displacement curves. Z Metallkd 2002;93:870-874.
28. Oliver WC, Pharr GM. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 1992;7:564-583.
29. Odegard GM, Bandorawalla T, Herring HM, Gates TS.Characterization of viscoelastic properties of polymeric materials through nanoindentation. In: Transactions of the 2003 Society for Experimental Mechanics Annual Conference and Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics, Charlotte, NC, June 2-3, 2003.
30. Edidin AA, Villarraga ML, Herr MP, Muth J, Yau SS, Kurtz SM. Accelerated aging studies of UHMWPE. 11. Virgin UHMWPE is not immune to oxidative degradation. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;61:323-329.
31. ASTM F. 2003-02. Standard practice for accelerated aging of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene after γ irradiation in air. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 13.01. West Conshohocken. PA: American Society for Testing and Materials International; 2005. pp 1035-1038.
32. Briscoe BJ, Fiori L, Pelillo. Nano-indentation of polymeric surfaces. J Phys D: Appl Phys 1998;31:2395-2405.
33. Klapperich C, Komvopoulos K, Pruitt L. Nanomechanical properties of polymers determined from nanoindentation experiments. J Tribol 2001;123:624-631.
34. Morlock M, Schneider E, Bluhm A, Vollmer M, Bergmann G, Muller V, Honl M. Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients. J Biomech 2001;34:873-881.
35. Zimmerman S, Hawkes WG, Hudson JI, Magaziner J, Hebel JR, Towheed T, Gardner J, Provenzano G, Kenzora JE. Outcomes of surgical management of total HIP replacement in patients aged 65 years and older: Cemented versus cementless femoral components and lateral or anterolateral versus posterior anatomical approach. J Orthop Res 2002;20:182-191.