Nanoindentation of injection molded PLA and self-reinforced composite PLA after in vitro conditioning for three months

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 388-396

  Wright Charlesworth, Debra D ^a   Miller, Darinda M ^a   Miskioglu, Ibrahim ^a   King, Julia A ^a  

^a Michigan Technological University   (United States)

Author keywords

Degradable polymers; In vitro; Nanoindentation; Poly(lactic acid)

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADATION; CARBOXYLIC ACIDS; COMPOSITE MATERIALS; ELASTIC MODULI; HARDNESS; INDENTATION; INJECTION MOLDING;

DEGRADABLE POLYMERS; IN VITRO; NANOINDENTATION; POLY(LACTIC ACID);

BIOMATERIALS;

PHOSPHATE BUFFERED SALINE; POLYLACTIC ACID; POLYMER;

ARTICLE; BIODEGRADATION; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; DEVICE; IMMERSION; IN VITRO STUDY; MEASUREMENT; SCREENING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STANDARD; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BUFFERS; LACTIC ACID; NANOTECHNOLOGY; POLYMERS; SODIUM CHLORIDE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 23744495455     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30353     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Middleton JC, Tipton AJ. Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices. Biomaterials 2000;21:2335-2346.
2. Liu L, Li S, Garreau H, Vert M. Selective enzymatic degradations of poly(L-lactide) and poly(ε-caprolactone) blend films. Biomacromolecules 2003;1:350-359.
3. Standard test method for in vitro degradation testing of Poly(L-lactic Acid) resin and fabricated form for surgical implants: ASTM Designation F1635-95(2000). ASTM Standards. Philadelphia: ASTM; 2003.
4. Oliver WC, Pharr GM. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation. J Mater Res 1992;7:1564-1583.
5. Wright-Charlesworth DD, Peers WJ, Miskioglu I, Loo LL. Nanomechanical properties of self-reinforced composite poly-(methyl methacrylate) as a function of processing temperature. J Biomed Mater Res A. Forthcoming.
6. Habelitz S, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr, Balooch MADo. Mechanical properties of human dental enamel on the nanometre scale. Arch Oral Biol 2001;46:173-183.
7. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle GADo. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 1993;72:1434-1442.
8. Zysset PK, Guo XE, Hoffler CE, Moore KE. Elastic modulus and hardness of cortical and trabecular bone lamellae measured by nanoindentation in the human femur. J Biomech 1999;32:1005-1012.
9. Klapperich C, Komvopoulos K, Pruitt L. Nanomechanical properties of polymers determined from nanoindentation experiments. J Tribol 2001;123:624-631.
10. Lewis AL, Cumming ZL, Goreish HH, Kirkwood LC, Tolhurst LA, Stratford PW. Crosslinkable coatings from phosphorylcholine-based polymers. Biomaterials 2001;22:99-111.
11. Xu HH, Smith DT, Schumacher GE, Eichmiller FC, Antonucci JM. Indentation modulus and hardness of whisker-reinforced heat-cured dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2000;16:248-254.
12. Ho SP, Riester L, Drews M, Boland T, LaBerge M. Effects of the sample preparation temperature on the nanostructure of compression moulded ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2002;216:123-133.
13. Zhou J, Chakravartula A, Pruitt L, Komvopoulos K. Tribological and nanomechanical properties of unmodified and crosslinked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene for total joint replacements. J Tribol 2004;126:386-394.
14. Park K, Mishra S, Lewis G, Losby J, Fan Z, Park JB. Quasi-static and dynamic nanoindentation studies on highly crosslinked ultra-high-molecular- weight polyethylene. Biomaterials 2004; 25:2427-2436.
15. Matsuda T, Kwon IK, Kidoaki S. Photocurable biodegradable liquid copolymers: synthesis of acrylate-end-capped trimethylene carbonate-based prepolymers, photocuring, and hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules 2004;5:295-305.
16. Gilbert JL, Ney DS, Lautenschlager EP. Self-reinforced composite poly(methyl methacrylate): static and fatigue properties. Biomaterials 1995;16:1043-1055.
17. Wright DD, Lautenschlager EP, Gilbert JL. The effect of processing temperature and time on the structure and fracture characteristics of self-reinforced composite poly(methyl methacrylate). J Mater Sci Mater Med 1999;10:503-512.
18. Miller DM. The effect of processing conditions and ceramic incorporation on the mechanical and nano mechanical properties of poly(lactic acid) [thesis]. Houghton, MI: Michigan Technological University; 2004.
19. Canevarolo S. Chain scission distribution function for polypropylene degradation during multiple extrusions. Polymer Degrad Stabil 2000;70:71-76.
20. Gonzalez-Gonzalez VA, Neira-Velazquez G, Angulo-Sanchez JL. Polypropylene chain scissions and molecular weight changes in multiple extrusion. Polymer Degrad Stabil 1998;60: 33-42.
21. Ramiro J, Eguiazabal JI, Nazabal J. Effects of reprocessing on the structure and mechanical properties of poly(trimethylene terephthalate). J Appl Polymer Sci 2002;86:2775-2780.
22. Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials, ASTM Designation D790-00. ASTM Standards. Philadelphia, PA: ASTM; 2001.
23. Perego G, Domenico G, Bastioli C. Effect of molecular weight and crystallinity on poly(lactic acid) mechanical properties. J Appl Polymer Sci 1996;59:37-43.
24. Saikku-Backstrom A, Tulamo RM, Pohjonen T, Törmälä P, Raiha JE, Rokkanen P, Material properties of absorbable self-reinforced fibrillated poly-96L/4 D-lactide (SR-PLA96) rods; A study in vitro and in vivo. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1999;10:1-8.
25. Daniels AU, Chang MK, Andriano KP. Mechanical properties of biodegradable polymers and composites proposed for internal fixation of bone. J Appl Biomater 1990;1:57-78.
26. Liao YS, Benya PD, McKellop HA. Effect of protein lubrication on the wear properties of materials for prosthetic joints. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;48:465-473.