An investigation of the differential effect of self-generation to improve learning and memory in multiple sclerosis and traumatic brain injury

Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 273-292

  O'Brien, Amanda ^b   Chiaravalloti, Nancy ^b   Arango Lasprilla, Juan Carlos ^b   Lengenfelder, Jeannie ^b   DeLuca, John ^a  

^a Neuropsychology and Neuroscience Laboratory   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOGENESIS; BRAIN FUNCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPISODIC MEMORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MEMORY DISORDER; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; RECALL; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 34247581785     PISSN: 09602011     EISSN: 14640694     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09602010600751160     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Andrade, V. M., Oliveira, M. G., Miranda, M. C., Oliveira, A. S., Oliveira, E. M.,& Bueno, O. F. (2003). Semantic relations and repetition of items enhance the free recall of words by multiple sclerosis patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25(8), 1070-1078.
2. Arnett, P. A., Rao, S. M., Grafman, J., Bernardin, L., Luchetta, T., Binder, J. R., & Lobeck, L. (1997). Executive functions in multiple sclerosis: An analysis of temporal ordering, semantic encoding, and planning abilities. Neuropsychology, 11(4), 535-544.
3. Barrett, A. M., Crucian, G. P., Schwartz, R. L., & Heilman, K. M. (2000). Testing memory for self-generated items in dementia: Method makes a difference. Neurology, 54(6), 1258-1264.
4. Begg, I., Snider, A., Foley, F., & Goddard, R. (1989). The generation effect is no artifact: Generation makes words distinctive. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 977-989.
5. Begg, I., Vinski, E., Frankovich, L., & Holgate, B. (1991). Generating makes words memorable, but so does effective reading. Memory and Cognition, 19(5), 487-497.
6. Bower, G., & Gilligan, S. (1979). Remembering information related to one's self. Journal of Research in Personality, 13(4), 420-432.
7. Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Kneer, R. (1995). False recognition reversal: When similarity is distinctive. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 157-185.
8. Brittain, J. L., La Marche, J. A., Reeder, K. P., Roth, D. L., & Boll, T. J. (1991). Effects of age and IQ on Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT) performance. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 5, 163-175.
9. Challis, B. H., Velichkovsky, B. M., & Craik, F. I. M. (1996). Levels-of-processing effects on a variety of memory tasks: New findings and theoretical implications. Consciousness and Cognition, 5(1/2), 142-164.
10. Chiaravalloti, N. D., & Deluca, J. (2002). Self-generation as a means of maximizing learning in multiple sclerosis: An application of the generation effect. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(8), 1070-1079.
11. Chiaravalloti, N. D., DeLuca, J., Moore, N. B., & Ricker, J. H. (2005). Treating learning impairments improves memory performance in multiple sclerosis: A randomized clinical trial. Multiple Sclerosis, 11(1), 58-68.
12. Chobor, K. L., & Schweiger, A. (1998). Processing of lexical ambiguity in patients with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11(1/2), 119-136.
13. Clark, S. E. (1995). The generation effect and the modeling of associations in memory. Memory and Cognition, 23(4), 442-455.
14. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
15. Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 104, 268-294.
16. DeLuca, J., Barbieri-Berger, S., & Johnson, S. K. (1994). The nature of memory impairments in multiple sclerosis: Acquisition versus retrieval. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16(2), 183-189.
17. DeLuca, J., Gaudino, E. A., Diamond, B. J., Christodoulou, C., & Engel, R. A. (1998). Acquisition and storage deficits in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20(3), 376-390.
18. DeLuca, J., Schultheis, M. T., Madigan, N. K., Christodoulou, C., & Averill, A. (2000). Acquisition versus retrieval deficits in traumatic brain injury: Implications for memory rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(10), 1327-1333.
19. Deshpande, S. A., Millis, S. R., Reeder, K. P., Fuerst, D., & Ricker, J. H. (1996). Verbal learning subtypes in traumatic brain injury: A replication. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 18(6), 836-842.
20. Dick, M. B., & Kean, M. L. (1989). Memory for internally generated words in Alzheimertype dementia: Breakdown in encoding and semantic memory. Brain and Cognition, 9(1), 88-108.
21. Duchnick, J. J., Vanderploeg, R. D., & Curtiss, G. (2002). Identifying retrieval problems using the California Verbal Learning Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(6), 840-851.
22. Eustache, F., Desgranges, B., Laville, P., Guillery, B., Lalevee, C., Schaeffer, S., de la Sayette, V., Iglesias, S., Baron, J. C., & Viader, F. (1999). Episodic memory in transient global amnesia: Encoding, storage, or retrieval deficit? Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 66(2), 148-154.
23. Gardiner, J. M., & Rowley, J. M. (1984). The generation effect with numbers rather than words. Memory and Cognition, 12(5), 443-445.
24. Gaudino, E. A., Chiaravalloti, N. D., DeLuca, J., & Diamond, B. J. (2001). A comparison of memory performance in relapsing-remitting, primary progressive and secondary progressive, multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, 14(1), 32-44.
25. Glisky, E. L., & Delaney, S. M. (1996). Implicit memory and new semantic learning in posttraumatic amnesia. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 11(2), 31-42.
26. Golden, C. J. (1978). Stroop Color and Word Test. Chicago: Stoelting.
27. Goverover, Y., Chiaravalloti, N., Johnston, M., & DeLuca, J. (2005). Self-generation to improving learning of everyday functional tasks in multiple sclerosis and traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11 (Suppl. 1), 49.
28. Green, S. B. & Salkind, N. J. (2003). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29. Hodges, J. R. (1994). Exploring disorders of semantic memory (pp. 77-94). New York: Plenum Press.
30. Hough, M. S., Pierce, R. S., Difilippo, M., & Pabst, M. J. (1997). Access and organization of goal-derived categories after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 11(11), 801-814.
31. Howe, M. L. (1998). When distinctiveness fails, false memories prevail. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 170-177.
32. Hunt, R. R. (2003). Two contributions of distinctive processing to accurate memories. Journal of Language and Memory, 48, 811-825.
33. Hunt, R. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 421-445.
34. Kenealy, P. M., Beaumont, J. G., Lintern, T. C., & Murrell, R. C. (2002). Autobiographical memory in advanced multiple sclerosis: Assessment of episodic and personal semantic memory across three time spans. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8(6), 855-860.
35. Klein, S. B., & Kilhstrom, J. F. (1986). Elaboration, organization, and the self-reference effect in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 26-38.
36. Klein, S. B., & Loftus, J. (1988). The nature of self-referent encoding: The contribution of elaborative and organizational processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 5-11.
37. Lengenfelder, J., Chiaravalloti, N. D., & DeLuca J. (2002). Examining the generation effect in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 173.
38. Lengenfelder, J., Chiaravalloti, N. D., & DeLuca, J. (2003). The generation effect: Comparisons between MS and TBI to improve new learning. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 320.
39. Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Lipinska, B., Backman, L., Mantyla, T., & Viitanen, M. (1994). Effectiveness of self-generated cues in early Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Neuropsychology, 16(6), 809-819.
41. Lokken, K., Ferraro, F. R., Petros, T., Bergloff, P., Thompson, S., & Teetzen, M. (1999). The effect of importance level, delay, and rate of forgetting on prose recall in multiple sclerosis. Applied Neuropsychology, 6(3), 147-153.
42. McElroy, L. A., & Slamecka N. J. (1982). Memorial consequences of generating nonwords: Implications for semantic-memory interpretations of the generation effect. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 249-259.
43. McKinlay, W., & Watkiss, A. J. (1999). Cognitive and behavioral effect of brain injury. Rehabilitation of the adult and child with traumatic brain injury (3rd ed., pp. 74-86). Philadelphia: FA Davis.
44. McMurray, D., & McIntyre, J. S. (1981). Depth of processing: Is there a semantic continuum? Australian Journal of Psychology, 33(2), 197-213.
45. Mitchell, D. B., Hunt, R. R., & Schmitt, F. A. (1986). The generation effect and reality monitoring: Evidence from dementia and normal aging. Journal of Gerontology, 41(1), 79-84.
46. Multhaup, K. S., & Balota, D. A. (1997). Generation effects and source memory in healthy older adults and in adults with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychology, 11(3), 382-391.
47. Olver, J. H., Ponsford, J. L., & Curran, C. A. (1996). Outcome following traumatic brain injury: A comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain Injury, 10(11), 841-848.
48. Payne, D. G., Neely, J. H., & Burns, D. J. (1986). The generation effect: Further tests of the lexical activation hypothesis. Memory and Cognition, 14(3), 246-252.
49. Pesta, B. J., Sanders, R. E., & Murphy, M. D. (1999). A beautiful day in the neighborhood: What factors determine the generation effect for simple multiplication problems? Memory and Cognition, 27(1), 106-115.
50. Pollmann, S., Haupt, M., Romero, B., & Kurz, A. (1993). Is impaired recall in dementia of the Alzheimer's type a consequence of a contextual retrieval deficit? Dementia, 4(2), 102-108.
51. Poser, C. M., Paty, D. W., Schinberg, L., McDonald, W. I., Davis, F. A., Ebers, G., et al. (1983). New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology, 13, 227-231.
52. Rao, S. M., Grafman, J., DiGiulio, D., Mittenberg, W., Bernardin, L., Leo, G. J., et al. (1993). Memory dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: Its relation to working memory, semantic encoding, and implicit learning. Neuropsychology, 7(3), 364-374.
53. Ricker, J. H., & Axelrod, B. N. (1994). Analysis of an oral paradigm of the Trail Making Test. Assessment, 1, 47-51.
54. Ricker, J. H., Axelrod, B. N., & Houtler, B. D. (1996). Clinical validation of the oral Trail Making Test. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, 9, 50-53.
55. Rosenthal, M., & Ricker, J. (2000). Traumatic brain injury. In R. Frank, & T. Elliott (Eds.), Handbook of rehabilitation psychology (pp. 49-74). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
56. Schallert, D. L. (1976). Improving memory for prose: The relationship between depth of processing and context. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15(6), 621-632.
57. Seamon, J., & Murray, P. (1976). Depth of processing in recall and recognition memory: Differential effects of stimulus meaningfulness and serial position. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2(6), 680-687.
58. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(6), 592-604.
59. Souliez, L., Pasquier, F., Lebert, F., Leconte, P., & Petit, H. (1996). Generation effect in short term verbal and visuospatial memory: Comparisons between dementia of the Alzheimer type and dementia of the frontal lobe type. Cortex, 32, 347-356.
60. Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1991). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. New York: Oxford University Press.
61. Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
62. Steffens, M. C., & Erdfelder, E. (1998). Determinants of positive and negative generation effects in free recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51(4), 705-733.
63. Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 371-394.
64. Taconnat, L., & Isingrini, M. (2004). Cognitive operations in the generation effect on a recall test: Role of aging and divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30(4), 827-837.
65. Thornton, A. E., & Raz, N. (1997). Memory impairment in multiple sclerosis: A quantitative review. Neuropsychology, 11(3), 357-366.
66. Thornton, A. E., Raz, N., & Tucker, K. A. (2002). Memory in multiple sclerosis: Contextual encoding deficits. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8(3), 395-409.
67. Vanderploeg, R. D., Crowell, T. A., & Curtiss, G. (2001). Verbal learning and memory deficits in traumatic brain injury: Encoding, consolidation, and retrieval. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23(2), 185-195.
68. Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised Manual. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
69. Wechsler, D. (1987). Wechsler Memory Scale - Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
70. Westmacott, R., & Moscovitch, M. (2003). The contribution of autobiographical significance to semantic memory. Memory and Cognition, 31(5), 761-774.
71. Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). Wide Range Achievement Test - 3, Administration Manual. Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.