Two contributions of distinctive processing to accurate memory

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 811-825

  Hunt, R Reed ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

Distinctiveness; Familiarity; Recall; Recognition; Recollection

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038625444     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00018-4     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 80, Pt. 2.
2. Dobbins, I. G., Kroll, N. E. A., Yonelinas, A. P., & Liu, Q. (1998). Distinctiveness in recognition and free recall: The role of recollection in rejection of the familiar. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 381-400.
3. Dodson, C. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 181-194.
4. Eysenck, M. W. (1979). Depth, elaboration, and distinctiveness. In L. S. Cermak, & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Gruppuso, V., Lindsay, D. S., & Kelley, C. M. (1997). The process-dissociation procedure and similarity: Defining and estimating recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 259-278.
6. Harris, G., Upfold, D., & Begg, I. (1982). On the role of the speaker's expectations in interpersonal communication. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 597-607.
7. Humphreys, M. S. (1976). Relational information and the context effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 4, 221-232.
8. Hunt, R. R. (1976). List context effects: Inaccessibility or indecision? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 423-430.
9. Hunt, R, R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 497-514.
10. Hunt, R. R., & Lamb, C. A. (2001). What causes the isolation effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1359-1366.
11. Hunt, R. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 421-445.
12. Hunt, R. R., & Smith, R. E. (1996). Accessing the particular from the general: The power of distinctiveness in the context of organization. Memory & Cognition, 24, 217-225.
13. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
14. Jacoby, L. L., & Craik, F. I. M. (1979). Effects of elaboration of processing at encoding and retrieval: Trace distinctiveness and recovery of initial context. In L. S. Cermak, & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Lockhart, R. S., Craik, F. I. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1976). Depth of processing, recognition, and recall: Some aspects of a general memory system. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition. London: Wiley.
16. Lindsay, D. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1991). Recognition memory and source monitoring. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 203-205.
17. Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100, 254-278.
18. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus test appropriate strategies. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
19. Mulligan, N. W., & Hirshman, E. (1997). Measuring the basis of recognition memory: An investigation of the process-dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 280-304.
20. Winograd, E. (1968). List differentiation, recall, and category similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 510-515.
21. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.
22. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.
23. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Noncriterial recollection: Familiarity as automatic, irrelevant recollection. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 131-141.
24. Yonelinas, A. P., Regehr, G., & Jacoby, L. L. (1995). Incorporating response bias in a dual-process of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 821-835.