Levels-of-processing effects on a variety of memory tasks: New findings and theoretical implications

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 5, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 142-164

  Challis, Bradford H ^a   Velichkovsky, Boris M ^b   Craik, Fergus I M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PERSONALITY TEST; RECALL; SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL METHOD; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITION; HUMANS; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WORD ASSOCIATION TESTS;

EID: 0030091231     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ccog.1996.0009     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bernstein, N. A. (1947). On the construction of movements. Moscow: Medgiz [In Russian].
2. Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 657-668.
3. Boucart, M., Lorenceau, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1995). Automatic access to object identities: Attention to global information, not to particular physical dimensions, is important. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 584-601.
4. Bridgeman, B., Van der Heijden, A. H. C., & Velichkovsky, B. M. (1994). A theory of visual stability across saccadic eye movements. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 247-258.
5. Brown, A. L. (1975). The development of memory: Knowing, knowing about knowing, and knowing how to know. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press.
6. Brown, A. S., & Mitchell, D. B. (1994). Levels of processing in implicit memory: A review. Memory and Cognition, 22, 533-541.
7. Challis, B. H., & Brodbeck, D. R. (1992). Level of processing affects priming in word fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 595-607.
8. Challis B. H., Chiu, C-Y., Kerr, S. A., Law, J., Schneider, L., Yonelinas, A., & Tulving, E. (1993). Perceptual and conceptual cueing in implicit and explicit retrieval. Memory, 1, 127-151.
9. Challis, B. H., & Sidhu, R. (1993). The dissociative effect of massed repetition on implicit and explicit measures of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 115-127.
10. Challis, B. H., & Tulving, E. (1993, November). Further support for a generation/recognition account of performance in word-fragment cued tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC.
11. Craik, F. I. M. (1983). On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B302, 341-359.
12. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
13. Craik, F. I. M., Moscovitch, M., & McDowd, J. M. (1994). Contributions of surface and conceptual information to performance on implicit and explicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 5, 864-875.
14. Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268-294.
15. Deacon, T. (1996). Prefrontal cortex and the high cost of symbolic learning: Why a brain capable of language evolved only once. In B. M. Velichkovsky & D. M. Rumbaugh (Eds.), Communicating meaning: The evolution and development of language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Fisher, R. P., & Craik, F. I. M. (1977). The interaction between encoding and retrieval operations in cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 153-171.
17. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Goldberg, E. (1989). Higher cortical functions in humans: The gradient approach. In E. Goldberg (Ed.), Contemporary neuropsychology and the legacy of Luria. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Graf, P., & Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable. Journal of Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 553-568.
20. Hamann, S. B. (1990). Level-of-processing effects in conceptually driven implicit tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 970-977.
21. Jacoby, L. L. (1975). Physical features vs. meaning: A difference in decay? Memory and Cognition, 3, 247-251.
22. Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 485-508.
23. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.
24. Jacoby, L. L., & Hollingshead, A. (1990). Toward a generate/recognize model of performance on direct and indirect tests of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 433-454.
25. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., & Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139-154.
26. Kapur, S., Craik, F. I. M., Tulving, E., Wilson, A. A., Houle, S., & Brown, G. M. (1994). Neuroanatomical correlates of encoding in episodic memory: Levels of processing effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 91, 2008-2011.
27. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Lockhart, R. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (1990). Levels of processing: A retrospective commentary on a framework for memory research. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 87-112.
29. Marmurek, H. C. C. (1995). Encoding, retrieval, main effects and interactions: Were Lockhart and Craik (1990) on the level? Canadian Journal of the Experimental Psychology, 49, 174-190.
30. Miall, D. S. (1986). Emotion and the self: The context of remembering. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 389-397.
31. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
32. Moscovitch, M., & Craik, F. I. M. (1976). Depth of processing, retrieval cues, and uniqueness of encoding as factors in recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 447-458.
33. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Richardson-Klavehn, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1988). Measures of memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 475-543.
35. Roediger, H. L. (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.
36. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller and J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63-131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
37. Roediger, H. L., Weldon, M. S., & Challis, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 3-14). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Roediger, H. L., Weldon, M. S., Stadler, M., & Riegler, G. (1992). Direct comparison of word stems and word fragments in implicit and explicit retention tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 251-269.
39. Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677-688.
40. Shimamura, A. P. (1994). The neuropsychology of metacognition. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 253-276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Srinivas, K., & Roediger, H. L. (1990). Testing the nature of two implicit tests: Dissociations between conceptually-driven and data-driven processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 389-412.
42. Thapar, A., & Greene, R. L. (1994). Effects of level of processing on implicit and explicit tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 671-679.
43. Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247, 301-305.
44. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
45. Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R. E., & Mace, W. (1978). Issues in the theory of action: Degrees of freedom, coordinative structures and coalitions. In J. Requin (Ed.) Attention and performance VII. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Velichkovsky, B. M. (1982). Visual cognition and its spatial-temporal context. In F. Klix, J. Hoffmann & E. van der Meer (Eds.), Cognitive research in psychology. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
47. Velichovksy, B. M. (1990). The vertical dimension of mental functioning. Psychological Research, 52, 282-289.
48. Velichkovsky, B. M. (1994). The levels endeavour in psychology and cognitive science. In P. Bertelson, P. Eelen, and G. d'Ydewalle (Eds.) International perspectives on psychological sciences: Leading themes. Howe, UK: Erlbaum.
49. Velichkovsky, B. M. (1995). Communicating attention: Gaze position transfer in cooperative problem solving. Pragmatics and Cognition, 3, 199-222.
50. Weldon, M. S., Roediger, H. L., & Challis, B. H. (1989). The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect. Memory & Cognition, 17, 95-105.