Bandwidth and fidelity on the NEO-Five Factor Inventory: Replicability and reliability of Saucier's (1998) item cluster subcomponents

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 88, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 220-234

  Chapman, Benjamin P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEO FIVE FACTOR INVENTORY; NEO PERSONALITY INVENTORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PARENT; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 34247472558     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223890701268082     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Csáki (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Theory (pp. 267-281). Budapest, Hungary: Akadémiai Kiadó.
2. Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Ashton, M. C. (1998). Personality and job performance: The importance of narrow traits. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 289-303.
4. Ashton, M. C., Jackson, D. G., Paunonen, S. V., Helmes, E., & Rothstein, M. G. (1995). The criterion validity of broad factor scales versus specific facet scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 432-442.
5. Beauducel, A., & Whittmann, W. W. (2005). Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 41-75.
6. Bentler, P. M. (1972). A lower-bound method for the dimension-free measurement of internal consistency. Social Science Research, 1, 343-357.
7. Bentler, P. M. (in press). Covariance structure models formaximal reliability of unit weighted composites. In S. Y. Lee (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation models. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
8. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Byrne, B. M. (2005). Factor analytic models: Viewing the structure of an assessment instrument from three perspectives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 17-32.
10. Carstensen, L. L. (1995). Evidence for a lifespan theory of socioemotional selectivity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 151-156.
11. Carver, C. S. (1989). How should multifaceted personality constructs be tested? Issues illustrated by self-monitoring, attributional style, and hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 577-585.
12. Cattell, R. B., & Krug, S. E. (1986) The number of factors in the 16PF: A review of the evidence with special emphasis on methodological problems. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 509-522.
13. Chapman, B. (2005). Emotional intelligence at mid life: A cross sectional investigation of factorial variance, social correlates, and relationships to established personality and ability taxonomies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas, CITY.
14. Chapman, B., & Hayslip, B. (2005). Incremental validity of a measure of trait emotional intelligence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 154-169.
15. Charles, E. P. (2005). The correction for attenuation due to measurement error: Clarifying concepts and creating confidence sets. Psychological Methods, 10, 206-226.
16. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
17. Cortina, J. M. (1993) What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104.
18. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Neo-PI, revised: Technical manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
19. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21-50.
20. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrica, 12, 1-16.
21. Cronbach, L. J. (1970). Essentials of psychological testing (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
22. Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1965). Psychological tests and personnel decisions. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
23. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
24. Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
25. Eysenck, H. (1998) Dimensions of personality. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
26. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
27. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
28. Harris, R. L., Elliot, A. M., & Holmes, D. S. (1986). The timing of psychosocial transitions and changes in women's lives: An examination of women aged 45-60. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 409-416.
29. Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. (1996). Issues and non-issues in the fidelity-bandwidth trade-off. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 627-637.
30. Jang, K. L., McCrae, R. R., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Livesley, W. J. (1998). Heritability of facet-level traits in a cross-cultural twin sample: Support for a hierarchical model of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1556-1565.
31. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. XXX-XXX). New York: Guilford.
32. Levinson, D. J. (1986). A conception of adult development. American Psychologist, 41, 3-13.
33. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004) In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320-341.
34. McCrae, R. R. (1986) Well-being scales do not measure social desirability. Journal of Gerontolgy, 41, 390-392.
35. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882-888.
36. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
37. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
38. Murray, G., Rawlings, D., Allen, N. B., & Trinder, J. (2003). NEO-Five Factor Inventory scores: Psychometric properties in a community sample. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 36, 140-149.
39. Nunnally, J. C., & Berstein, I. H. (1994) Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Olsson, U. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 44, 443-460.
41. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1996). Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 609-626.
42. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Meta-analysis of integrity test validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679-703.
43. Paunonen, S. V. (1998). Hierarchical organization of personality and prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 538-556.
44. Paunonen, S. V. (2003). Big five factors of personality and replicated predictions of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 411-424.
45. Paunonen S.V., & Ashton, M.C. (2001). Big Five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524-539.
46. Ployhart, R. E., & Oswald, F. L. (2004). Applications of mean and covariance structure analysis: Integrating correlational and experimental approaches. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 27-65.
47. Ray, J. J. (1988). Lie scales and the elderly. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 417-418.
48. Ray, J. J., & Lovejoy, F. H. (2003). Age-related social desirability responding among Australian women. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 669-671.
49. Raykov, T. (1997a). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 173-184.
50. Raykov, T. (1997b). Scale reliability, Cronbach's coefficient alpha, and violations of essential tau-equivalence with fixed congeneric components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 329-353.
51. Raykov, T. (1998). On the use of confirmatory factor analysis in personality research. Personality and Individual Differences, 1998, 291-293.
52. Rhodes, R. E., & Courneya, K. S. (2003). Relationships between personality, an extended theory of planned behaviour model and exercise behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 19-36.
53. Rhodes, R. E., Courneya, K. S., & Jones, L. W. (2002). Personality, the theory of planned behavior, and exercise: A unique role for extroversion's activity facet. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1721-1736.
54. Russell, D., Peplau, L., & Cutrona, C. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472-480.
55. Saucier, G. (1998). Replicable item-cluster subcomponents in the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 263-276.
56. Saucier, G., & Ostendorf, F. (1999). Hierarchical subcomponents of the big five personality factors: A cross-language replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 613-627.
57. Saris, W. E., & Aalberts, C. (2003). Different explanations for correlated disturbance terms in MTMM studies. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 193-213.
58. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, 308-313.
59. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507-514.
60. Schinka, J. A., Kinder, B., & Kremer, T. (1997). Research validity scales for the NEO-PI-R: Development and initial validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 7, 395-408.
61. Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogenous versions of the Marlowe-Crown Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191-193.
62. Streiner, D. L. (2003a). Being inconsistent about consistency: When coefficient alpha does and doesn't matter. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 217-222.
63. Streiner, D. L. (2003b). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 99-103.
64. Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10-39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
65. Terraciano, A., McCrae, R. R., Brand, L. J., & Costa, P. T. (2005). Hierarchical linear modeling analyses of the NEO-PI-R scales in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Psychology and Aging, 20, 493-506.
66. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Harkness, A. R. (1994). Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 18-31.
67. Weiss, A., & Costa, P. T. (2005). Domain and facet personality predictors of all-cause mortality among medicare patients aged 65 to 100. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67, 724-733.
68. Weiss, A., Costa, P. T., Karuza, J., Duberstein, P. R., Friedman, B., & McCrae, R. R. (2005). Cross sectional age differences in personality among Medicare patients aged 65 to 100. Psychology and Aging, 20, 182-185.
69. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-70.
70. Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2004). On chi-square difference and z tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is misspecified. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 737-757.
71. Zelenski, J. M., Rusting, C. L., & Larsen, R. J. (2003). Consistency in the time of experiment participation and personality correlates: A methodological note. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 547-558.
72. H: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 1-11.
73. Zitzow, D. (1984a). The college adjustment rating scale. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 160-164.
74. Zitzow, D. (1984b). The college adjustment rating scale (CARS) manual. Detroit Lakes, MN: Personal Development Consultants.