Synergies between intrinsic and synaptic plasticity mechanisms

Neural Computation

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 885-909

  Triesch, Jochen ^a,b  

^a FRANKFURT INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247243264     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2007.19.4.885     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aizenman, C., Akerman, C., Jensen, K., & Hollis, T. (2003). Visually driven regulation of intrinsic neuronal excitability improves stimulus detection in vivo. Neuron, 39, 831-842.
2. Baddeley, R., Abbott, L. F., Booth, M., Sengpiel, F., & Freeman, T. (1998). Responses of neurons in primary and inferior temporal visual cortices to natural scenes. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 264, 1775-1783.
3. Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995). An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Computation, 7, 1129-1159.
4. Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1997). The "independent components" of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Research, 37, 3327-3338.
5. Bertschinger, N., & Natschläger, T. (2004). Real-time computation at the edge of chaos in recurrent neural networks. Neural Computation, 16, 1413-1436.
6. Bienenstock, E., Cooper, L., & Munro, P. (1982). Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: Orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 2, 32-48.
7. Blais, B. S., Intrator, N., Shouval, H., & Cooper, L. N. (1998). Receptive field formation in natural scene environments. Neural Computation, 10, 1797-1813.
8. h, conductances. Neural Computation, 17, 991-995.
9. Bush, P., Prince, D., & Miller, K. (1999). Increased pyramidal excitability and NMDA conductance can explain posttraumatic epileptogenesis without disinhibition: A model. Journal of Neurophysiology, 82(4), 1748-1758.
10. Butko, N. J., & Triesch, J. (2006). Exploring the role of intrinsic plasticity for the learning of sensory representations. In M. Verleysen (Ed.), European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ESANN) (pp. 467-472). Bruges, Belgium: d-side.
11. Cooper, L., Intrator, N., Blais, B., & Shouval, H. (2004). Theory of cortical plasticity. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publishing.
12. Cudmore, R., & Turrigiano, G. (2004). Long-term potentiation of intrinisic excitability in LV visual cortical neurons. J. Neurophysiol., 92, 341-348.
13. Daoudal, G., & Debanne, D. (2003). Long-term plasticity of intrinsic excitability: Learning rules and mechanisms. Learning and Memory, 10, 456-465.
14. Dayan, P., & Abbott, L. F. (2001). Theoretical neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Desai, N. S., Rutherford, L. C., & Turrigiano, G. G. (1999). Plasticity in the intrinsic excitability of cortical pyramidal neurons. Nature Neuroscience, 2(6), 515-520.
16. Földiák, P. (1990). Forming sparse representations by local anti-Hebbian learning. Biological Cybernetics, 64, 165-170.
17. Houweling, A., Bazhenov, M., Timofeev, I., Steriade, M., & Sejnowski, T. (2005). Homeostatic synaptic plasticity can explain post-traumatic epileptogenesis in chronically isolated neocortex. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 834-845.
18. Hyvärinen, A., Karhunen, J., & Oja, E. (2001). Independent component analysis. New York: Wiley.
19. Hyvärinen, A., & Oja, E. (1997). A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis. Neural Computation, 9, 1483-1492.
20. Hyvärinen, A., & Oja, E. (1998). Independent component analysis by general nonlinear Hebbian-like learning rules. Signal Processing, 64(3), 301-313.
21. Janowitz, M., & van Rossum, M. (2006). Excitability changes that complement Hebbian learning. Network Computation in Neural Systems, 17(1), 31-41.
22. Kirkwood, A., Rioult, M., & Bear, M. (1996). Experience-dependent modification of synaptic plasticity in visual cortex. Nature, 381, 526-528.
23. Laughlin, S. (1981). A simple coding procedure enhances a neuron's information capacity. Z. Naturforsch., 36c, 910-912.
24. Lehky, S., Sejnowski, T., & Desimone, R. (2005). Selectivity and sparseness in the responses of striate complex cells. Vision Research, 45, 57-73.
25. Maffei, A., Nelson, S., & Turrigiano, G. (2004). Selective reconfiguration of layer 4 visual cortical circuitry by visual deprivation. Nature. Neuroscience, 7(12), 1353-1359.
26. Marder, E., Abbott, L. F., Turrigiano, G. G., Liu, Z., & Golowasch, J. (1996). Memory from the dynamics of intrinsic membrane currents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 13481-13486.
27. Montague, P., Dayan, P., Person, C., & Sejnowski, T. (1995). Bee foraging in uncertain environments using predictive Hebbian learning. Nature, 377, 725-728.
28. Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1996). Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature, 381, 607-609.
29. Pennartz, C. (1995). The ascending neuromodulatory systems in learning by reinforcement: Comparing computational conjectures with experimental findings. Brain Res. Rev., 21, 219-245.
30. Prince, D., & Tseng, G.-F. (1993). Epileptogenesis in chronically injured cortex: In vitro studies. Journal of Neurophysiology, 69, 1276-1291.
31. Roelfsema, P. R., & van Ooyen, A. (2005). Attention-gated reinforcement learning of internal representations for classification. Neural Computation, 17, 2176-2214.
32. Shin, J., Koch, C., & Douglas, R. (1999). Adaptive neural coding dependent on the time-varying statistics of the somatic input current. Neural Computation, 11, 1893-1913.
33. Stellwagen, D., & Malenka, R. C. (2006). Synaptic scaling mediated by glial TNF-α. Nature, 440(7087), 1054-1059.
34. Stemmler, M., & Koch, C. (1999). How voltage-dependent conductances can adapt to maximize the information encoded by neuronal firing rate. Nature Neuroscience, 2(6), 521-527.
35. Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Triesch, J. (2005a). A gradient rule for the plasticity of a neuron's intrinsic excitability. In W. Duch, J. Kacprzyk, E. Oja, & S. Zadrozny (Eds.), Proc. Int. Conf., on Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN) (pp. 65-70). Berlin: Springer.
37. Triesch, J. (2005b). Synergies between intrinsic and synaptic plasticity in individual model neurons. In L. K. Saul, Y. Weiss, & L. Bottou (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 17. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Turrigiano, G., Leslie, K., Desai, N., Rutherford, L., & Nelson, S. (1998). Activity-dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons. Nature, 391, 892-896.
39. Turrigiano, G., & Nelson, S. (2000). Hebb and homeostasis in neuronal plasticity. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 10(3), 358-364.
40. Turrigiano, G., & Nelson, S. (2004). Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system. Nature Revisais Neuroscience, 5, 97-107.
41. van Welie, I., van Hooft, J. A., & Wadman, W. J. (2004). Homeostatic scaling of neuronal excitability by synaptic modulation of somatic hyperpolarization-activated 4, channels. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 101(14), 5123-5128.
42. + conductance. J. Neuraphystology, 95, 2007-2012.
43. Vinje, W. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2000). Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. Science, 287, 1273-1276.
44. Willmore, B., & Tolhurst, D. (2001). Characterizing the sparseness of neural codes. Network Computation in Neural Systems, 12, 255-270.
45. Zhang, M., Hung, F., Zhu, Y., Xie, Z., & Wang, J.-H. (2004). Calcium signal-dependent plasticity of neuronal excitability developed postnatally. J. Neurobiol., 61(2), 277-287.
46. Zhang, W., & Linden, D. J. (2003). The other side of the engram: Experience-driven changes in neuronal intrinsic excitability. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 885-900.