Recognizing face identity from natural and morphed smiles

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 801-808

  Lander, Karen ^a   Chuang, Lewis ^b   Wickham, Lee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMAN; MEMORY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECOGNITION; STUDENT; VISION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FACE; HUMANS; MEMORY; MOVEMENT; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SMILING; STUDENTS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33646371270     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210600576136     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bassili, J. N. (1978). Facial motion in the perception of faces and emotional expression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 373-379.
2. Baudouin, J. Y., Gilibert, D., Sansone, S., & Tiberghien, G. (2000). When the smile is a cue to familiarity. Memory, 8, 285-292.
3. Bruce, V., & Young, A., (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-327.
4. Burton, A. M., Wilson, S., Cowan, M., & Bruce, V. (1999). Face recognition in poor-quality video: Evidence from security surveillance. Psychological Science, 10, 243-248.
5. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
6. DeCarlo, D., & Metaxas, D. (2000). Optical flow constraints on deformable models with applications to face tracking. International Journal of Computer Vision, 38, 99-127.
7. Gillund, G., & Shriffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
8. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 223-233.
9. Hill, H., & Johnston, A. (2001). Categorizing sex and identity from the biological motion of faces. Current Biology, 11, 880-885.
10. Hill, H., & Pollick, F. (2000). Exaggerating temporal differences enhances recognition of individuals from point light displays. Psychological Science, 11, 223-228.
11. Kamachi, M., Bruce, V., Mukaida, S., Gyoba, J., Yoshikawa, S., & Akamatsu, S. (2001). Dynamic properties influence the perception of facial expressions. Perception, 30, 875-887.
12. Knappmeyer, B., Thornton, I. M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2003). The use of facial motion and facial form during the processing of identity. Vision Research, 43, 1921-1936.
13. Knight, B., & Johnston, A. (1997). The role of movement in face recognition. Visual Cognition, 4, 265-273.
14. LaBar, K. S., Crupain, M. J., Voyvodic, J. T., & McCarthy, G. (2003). Dynamic perception of facial affect and identity in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 1023-1033.
15. Lander, K., & Bruce, V. (2000). Recognizing famous faces: Exploring the benefits of facial motion. Ecological Psychology, 12, 259-272.
16. Lander, K., Bruce, V., & Hill, H. (2001). Evaluating the effectiveness of pixelation and blurring on masking the identity of familiar faces. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 101-116.
17. Lander, K., Christie, F., & Bruce, V. (1999). The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces. Memory & Cognition, 27, 974-985.
18. Lander, K., & Chuang, L. (2004). Why are moving faces easier to recognize? Visual Cognition, 12, 429-442.
19. O'Toole, A. J., Roark, D. A., & Abdi, H. (2002). Recognizing moving faces: A psychological and neural synthesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 261-266.
20. Pilz, K. S., Thornton, I. M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (in press). A search advantage for faces learned in motion. Experimental Brain Research.
21. Rosenblum, L. D., & Saldaña, H. M. (1998). Time-varying information for visual speech perception. In R. Campbell, B. Dodd, & D. Bumham (Eds.), Hearing by eye II: Advances In the psychology of speechreading and auditory-visual speech. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
22. Schweinberger, S. R., & Soukup, G. R. (1998). Asymmetric relationships among perceptions of facial identity, emotion, and facial speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(6), 1748-1765.