Spatial occurrence of a habitat-tracking saproxylic beetle inhabiting a managed forest landscape

Ecological Applications

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 900-909

  Schroeder, L Martin ^a   Ranius, Thomas ^a   Ekbom, Barbara ^a   Larsson, Stig ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Habitat tracking metapopulation; Harminius undulatus; Incidence function model; Landscape wide recruitment; Modeling; Occupancy pattern; Saproxylic beetle

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; BOREAL FOREST; HABITAT QUALITY; LANDSCAPE; METAPOPULATION; POPULATION MODELING; RECRUITMENT; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES OCCURRENCE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BARK; BEETLE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FORESTRY; LARVA; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; SWEDEN; THEORETICAL MODEL; TREE;

ANIMALS; BEETLES; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; FORESTRY; LARVA; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PLANT BARK; POPULATION DENSITY; SWEDEN; TREES;

COLEOPTERA;

EID: 34247190746     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/06-0090     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Akçakaya, H. R., J. Franklin, A. D. Syphard, and J. R. Stephensson. 2005. Viability of Bell's sage sparrow (Amphispiza belli ssp. belli): altered fire regimes. Ecological Applications 15:521-531.
2. Akçakaya, H. R., V. C. Radeloff, D. J. Mladenoff, and H. S. He. 2004. Integrating landscape and metapopulation modeling approaches: viability of the sharp-tailed grouse in a dynamic landscape. Conservation Biology 18:526-537.
3. Begon, M., J. L. Harper, and C. R. Townsend, editors. 1990. Ecology: individuals, populations and communities. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, UK.
4. Bergman, K.-O., and O. Kindvall. 2004. Population viability analysis of the butterfly Lopinga achine in a changing landscape in Sweden. Ecography 27:49-58.
5. Biedermann, R. 2004. Modelling the spatial dynamics and persistence of the leaf beetle Goniactena olivacea in dynamic habitats. Oikos 107:645-653.
6. Dahlberg, A., and J. N. Stokland. 2004. Vedlevande arters krav på substrat: sammanställning och analys av 3600 arter. Skogsstyrelsen, Rapport 7. Jönköping, Sweden. [In Swedish with English summary.]
7. Ekbom, B., M. Schroeder, and S. Larsson. 2006. Stand specific occurrence of coarse woody debris in a managed boreal forest landscape in central Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management 221:2-12.
8. Esseen, P.-A., B. Ehnström, L. Ericson, and K. Sjöberg. 1997. Boreal forests. Ecological Bulletins 46:16-47.
9. Fahrig, L. 1992. Relative importance of spatial and temporal scales in a patchy environment. Theoretical Population Biology 41:300-314.
10. Fridman, J., and M. Walheim. 2000. Amount, structure, and dynamics of dead wood on managed forestland in Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management 131:23-36.
11. Gärdenfors, U. 2000. The 2000 Red List of Swedish species. ArtDatabanken, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
12. Gärdenfors, U. 2005. The 2005 Red List of Swedish species. ArtDatabanken, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
13. Gessler, C. 1998. Impedimentens potentiella betydelse för biologisk mångfald. En studie av myr- och bergimpediment i ett skogslandskap i Västerbotten. [In Swedish with English summary.] Arbetsrapport 45, Institutionen för skoglig resurshushållning och geometik, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Umeå, Sweden.
14. Gu, W., R. Heikkilä, and I. Hanski. 2002. Estimating the consequences of habitat fragmentation on extinction risk in dynamic landscapes. Landscape Ecology 17:699-710.
15. Hanski, I. 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology 63:151-162.
16. Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
17. Hanski, I., and O. E. Gaggiotti, editors. 2004. Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
18. Harrison, S., and A. D. Taylor. 1997. Empirical evidence for metapopulation dynamics. Pages 27-42 in I. A. Hanski and M. E. Gilpin, editors. Metapopulation biology. Ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
19. Johnson, D. M. 2005. Metapopulation models: an empirical test of model assumptions and evaluation methods. Ecology 86:3088-3098.
20. Keymer, J. E., P. A. Marquet, J. X. Velasco-Hernández, and S. A. Levin. 2000. Extinction thresholds and metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes. American Naturalist 156:478-494.
21. Kouki, J., S. Löfman, P. Martikainen, S. Rouvinen, and A. Uotila. 2001. Forest fragmentation in Fennoscandia: linking habitat requirements of wood-associated threatened species to landscape and habitat changes. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research Supplement 3:27-37.
22. Laibner, S. 2000. Elateridae of the Czech and Slovac Republics. Kabourek, Zlin, Czech Republic.
23. Lennon, J. J. 2000. Red-shifts and red herrings in geographical ecology. Ecography 23:101-113.
24. Lundberg, S. 1995. Catalogus Coleopterum Sueciae. [In Swedish.] Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, Stockholm, Sweden.
25. Marshall, P. L., G. Davis, and V. M. LeMay. 2000. Using line intersect sampling for coarse woody debris. Forest Reserch Technical Report, Vancouver Forest Region, Canada, TR-003, Ecology. Forest Service, British Columbia, Canada.
26. Moilanen, A., A. T. Smith, and I. Hanski. 1998. Long-term dynamics in a metapopulation of the American pika. American Naturalist 152:530-542.
27. National Board of Forestry. 2004. Statistical yearbook of forestry 2004: official statistics of Sweden. National Board of Forestry, Jönköping, Sweden.
28. Nilsson, S. G., and R. Baranowski. 1996. Changes in the Swedish distribution of click beetles (Elateridae) occurring in the boreal forest. [In Swedish with English summary.] Entomologisk Tidskrift 117:87-101.
29. Ovaskainen, O., and I. Hanski. 2002. Transient dynamics in metapopulation response to perturbation. Theoretical Population Biology 61:285-295.
30. Palm, T. 1946. Coleopterfaunan i en jämtländsk lavgranskog: träden och svampfaunan. [In Swedish.] Entomologisk Tidskrift 67:109-139.
31. Palm, T. 1951. Die Holz- und Rinden-Käfer der nordschwedishen Laubbäume. [In German.] Meddelanden från Statens Skogsforskningsinstitut 40:1-242.
32. Palm, T. 1959. Die Holz und Rinden-käfer der süd und mittelschwedischen Laubbäume. [In German.] Opuscula Entomologica Supplementum XVI:1-347.
33. Penttilä, R., J. Siitonen, and M. Kuusinen. 2004. Polypore diversity in managed and old-growth boreal Picea abies forests in southern Finland. Biological Conservation 117:271-283.
34. Ranius, T., O. Kindvall, N. Kruys, and B. G. Jonsson. 2003. Modelling dead wood in Norway spruce stands subject to different management regimes. Forest Ecology and Management 182:13-29.
35. Saalas, U. 1917. Die Fichtenkäfer Finnlands I. Suomalaisen Tiedekatemian Kustantama, Helsinki, Finland. [In German.]
36. Schroeder, L. M., T. Ranius, B. Ekbom, and S. Larsson. 2006. Recruitment of saproxylic beetles in high stumps created for maintaining biodiversity in a boreal forest landscape. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:2168-2178.
37. Siitonen, J., and L. Saaristo. 2000. Habitat requirements and conservation of Pytho kolwensis, a beetle species of old-growth boreal forest. Biological Conservation 94:211-220.
38. Snäll, T., A. Hagström, J. Rudolphi, and H. Rydin. 2004. Distribution pattern of the epiphyte Neckera pennata on three spatial scales: importance of past landscape structure, connectivity and local conditions. Ecography 27:757-766.
39. Snäll, T., J. Pennanen, L. Kivistö, and I. Hanski. 2005. Modelling epiphyte metapopulation dynamics in a dynamic forest landscape. Oikos 109:209-222.
40. Stelter, C., M. Reich, V. Grimm, and C. Wissel. 1997. Modelling persistence in dynamic landscapes: lessons from a metapopulation of the grasshopper Bryodema tuberculata. Journal of Animal Ecology 66:508-518.
41. Thomas, C. D. 1994. Extinction, colonisation and metapopulations: environmental tracking by rare species. Conservation Biology 8:373-378.
42. Tilman, D., R. M. May, C. L. Lehman, and M. A. Nowak. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65-66.
43. Verheyen, K., M. Vellend, H. van Calster, G. Peterken, and M. Hermy. 2004. Metapopulation dynamics in changing landscapes: a new spatially realistic model for forest plants. Ecology 85:3302-3312.
44. Wahlberg, N., T. Klemetti, and I. Hanski. 2002. Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly. Ecography 25:224-232.