Distribution pattern of the epiphyte Neckera pennata on three spatial scales - Importance of past landscape structure, connectivity and local conditions

Ecography

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 757-766

  Snäll, Tord ^a   Hagström, Anna ^b   Rudolphi, Jörgen ^c   Rydin, Håkan ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Fredsberg ^*  (Sweden)

^c SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONNECTIVITY; EPIPHYTE; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; MOSS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION;

ACER; ACER PLATANOIDES; BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; FRAXINUS; FRAXINUS EXCELSIOR; NECKERA; NECKERA PENNATA; PTERIDOPHYTA;

EID: 11144279302     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.04026.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at statistical model identification. - IEEE T. Automat. Contr. AC-19: 716-722.
2. Akçakaya, H. R. et al. 2004. Integrating landscape and metapopulation modeling approaches: viability of the sharp-tailed grouse in a dynamic landscape. - Conserv. Biol. 18: 526-537.
3. Anon. 1997a. Naturvårdsinventering av Uppsala kommun 1988-1996. Bladåkers socken. - Rapport 38/40, Park och Natur, Uppsala.
4. Anon. 1997b. Fältinstruktion för ståndortskarteringen. - Inst. för skoglig marklära, Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences.
5. Anon. 1999. Handbok för miljöövervakning. Programområde skogsmark. Delprogram Extensiv övervakning av skogsbiotopers (-bestånds) innehåll med inriktning mot biologisk mångfald. - Available at 〈www.naturvardsverket.se〉, in Swedish.
6. Appelgren, L. and Cronberg, N. 1999. Genetic and morphological variation in the rare epiphytic moss Neckera pennata Hedw. - J. Bryol. 21: 97-107.
7. Avery, T. E. 1978. Forester's guide to aerial photo interpretation. - Agriculture handbook, United States Dept of Agriculture, Washington, USA.
8. Azzalini, A. 1996. Statistical inference based on the likelihood. - Chapman and Hall.
9. Eriksson, P. 1997. Ekologisk landskapsplanering i Vällenområ det. - Rapport 5, Upplandsstiftelsen. Uppsala, in Swedish.
10. Gärdenfors, U. 2000. Rödlistade arter i Sverige - The 2000 Red List of Swedish Species. - ArtDatabanken, Swedish Univ. Agricultural Sciences.
11. Gu, W. D. et al. 2001. Spatial pattern in the occurrence of the lichen Lobaria pulmonaria in managed and virgin forests. - Ecography 24: 139-150.
12. Gu, W. D., Heikkilä, R. and Hanski, I. 2002. Estimating the consequences of habitat fragmentation on extinction risk in dynamic landscapes. - Landscape Ecol. 17: 699-710.
13. Gustafsson, L. and Eriksson, I. 1995. Factors of importance for the epiphytic vegetation of aspen Populus tremula with special emphasis on bark chemistry and soil chemistry. - J. Appl. Ecol. 32: 412-424.
14. Hanski, I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics. - Nature 396: 41-49.
15. Hanski, I. 1999a. Metapopulation ecology. - Oxford Univ. Press.
16. Hanski, I. 1999b. Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes. - Oikos 87: 209-219.
17. Hanski, I. 2000. Extinction dept and species credit in boreal forests: modelling the consequences of different approaches to biodiversity conservation. - Ann. Zool. Fenn. 38: 271-280.
18. Hanski, I. and Ovaskainen, O. 2000. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. - Nature 404: 755-758.
19. Hanski, I. and Gaggiotti, O. E. 2004. Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. - Elsevier.
20. Hazell, P. et al. 1998. Presence and abundance of four epiphytic bryophytes in relation to density of aspen (Populus tremula) and other stand characteristics. - For. Ecol. Manage. 107: 147-158.
21. Heegaard, E. and Hangelbroek, H. H. 1999. The distribution of Ulota crispa at a local scale in relation to both dispersal- and habitat-related factors. - Lindbergia 24: 65-74.
22. Heywood, V. H. 1995. Global biodiversity assessment. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
23. Kuusinen, M. 1996. Epiphyte flora and diversity on basal trunks of six old-growth forest tree species in southern and middle boreal Finland. - Lichenologist 28: 443-463.
24. Kuusinen, M. and Penttinen, A. 1999. Spatial pattern of the epiphytic threatened bryophyte Neckera pennata at two scales in a fragmented boreal forest. - Ecography 22: 729-735.
25. Lowman, M. D. and Nadkarni, M. N. 1995. Forest canopies. - Academic Press.
26. McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. 1989. Generalized linear models. - Chapman and Hall/CRC.
27. Nitare, J. 2000. Signalarter. Indikatorer på skyddsvärd skog. Flora över kryptogamer. - Laholms tryckeri Offset, Laholm, Sweden.
28. Nyholm, E. 1960. Illustrated moss flora of Fennoscandia. - Nordic Bryological Society, Lund, Sweden.
29. Ojala, E., Mönkkönen, M. and Inkeröinen, J. 2000. Epiphytic bryophytes on European aspen Populus tremula in old-growth forests in northeastern Finland and in adjacent sites in Russia. - Can. J. Bot. 78: 529-536.
30. Ovaskainen, O. and Hanski, I. 2002. Transient dynamics in metapopulation response to perturbation. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 61: 285-295.
31. Penttilä, R., Siitonen, J. and Kuusinen, M. 2004. Polypore diversity in managed and old-growth boreal Picea abies forests in southern Finland. - Biol. Conserv. 117: 271-283.
32. Petit, S. and Burel, F. 1998. Effects of landscape dynamics on the metapopulation of a ground beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in a hedgerow network. - Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 69: 243-252.
33. R Development Core Team 2003. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. - R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
34. Ribeiro, Jr, P. J. and Diggle, P. J. 2001. geoR: a package for geostatistical analysis. - R News 1: 15-18.
35. Rose, F. 1992. Temperate forest management: its effect on bryophyte and lichen floras and habitats. - In: Bates, J. W. and Farmer, A. M. (eds), Bryophytes and lichens in a changing environment. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 211-233.
36. Rydin, H., Snoeijs, P. and Diekman, M. 1999. Swedish plant geography. - Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 84.
37. Snäll, T., Ribeiro, Jr, P. J. and Rydin, H. 2003. Spatial occurrence and colonisations in patch-tracking metapopulations of epiphytic bryophytes: local conditions versus dispersal. - Oikos 103: 566-578.
38. Snäll, T. et al. 2004. Spatial genetic structure in two congeneric epiphytes with different dispersal strategies analysed with three different methods. - Mol. Ecol. 13: 2109-2119.
39. Snäll, T. et al. in press. Modelling epiphyte metapopulation dynamic in a dynamic forest landscape. - Oikos.
40. Snäll, T., Ehrlén, J. and Rydin, H. 2005. Colonization and extinction dynamics of an epiphyte metapopulation in a dynamic landscape. - Ecology 86, in press.
41. Tilman, D. et al. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. - Nature 371: 65-66.
42. Venables, W. N. and Ripley, B. D. 1999. Modern applied statistics with S-PLUS. - Springer.
43. Verheyen, K. et al. 2003. An integrated analysis of the effects of past land use on forest herb colonization at the landscape scale. - J. Ecol. 91: 731-742.
44. Wiklund, K. and Rydin, H. 2004a. Ecophysiological constraints for spore establishment in bryophytes. - Funct. Ecol. 18, in press.
45. Wiklund, K. and Rydin, H. 2004b. Colony expansion of Neckera pennata: modelled growth rate and effect of microhabitat, competition and precipitation. - Bryologist 107: 293-301.