Development of a near activity visual questionnaire to assess accommodating intraocular lenses

Contact Lens and Anterior Eye

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 134-143

  Gupta, Navneet ^a   Wolffsohn, James S ^a   Naroo, Shehzad A ^a   Davies, Leon N ^a   Gibson, George A ^a   Shah, Sunil ^b  

^a ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Midland Eye Institute   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accommodating IOLs; Presbyopia; Quality of life; Questionnaire; Rasch analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CRITERION RELATED VALIDITY; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; LENS IMPLANT; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PILOT STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRESBYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RASCH ANALYSIS; READING; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCORING SYSTEM; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; VISION;

EID: 34247173373     PISSN: 13670484     EISSN: 14765411     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2007.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Vitale S., and Schein O.D. Qualitative research in functional vision. Int Ophthalmol Clin 43 (2003) 17-30
2. Tesio L. Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research. J Rehabil Med 35 (2003) 105-115
3. Guillon M., Maissa C., Cooper P., Girard-Claudon K., and Poling T.R. Visual performance of a multi-zone bifocal and a progressive multifocal contact lens. Clao J 28 (2002) 88-93
4. Woods C., Ruston D., Hough T., and Efron N. Clinical performance of an innovative back surface multifocal contact lens in correcting presbyopia. Clao J 25 (1999) 176-181
5. Kuchle M., Seitz B., Langenbucher A., Gusek-Schneider G.C., Martus P., and Nguyen N.X. Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 318-324
6. Heatley C.J., Spalton D.J., Hancox J., Kumar A., and Marshall J. Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol 140 (2005) 207-213
7. Dogru M., Honda R., Omoto M., Toda I., Fujishima H., Arai H., et al. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 895-902
8. Wolffsohn J.S., Naroo S.A., Motwani N.K., Shah S., Hunt O.A., Mantry S., et al. Subjective and objective performance of the Lenstec KH-3500 "accommodative" intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol 90 (2006) 693-696
9. Weghaupt H., Pieh S., and Skorpik C. Visual properties of the foldable array multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 22 Suppl. 2 (1996) 1313-1317
10. Wang J.C., Tan A.W., Monatosh R., and Chew P.T. Experience with ARRAY multifocal lenses in a Singapore population. Singapore Med J 46 (2005) 616-620
11. Baikoff G., Matach G., Fontaine A., Ferraz C., and Spera C. Correction of presbyopia with refractive multifocal phakic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 1454-1460
12. Dick H.B., Gross S., Tehrani M., Eisenmann D., and Pfeiffer N. Refractive lens exchange with an array multifocal intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 18 (2002) 509-518
13. Fine I.H., Hoffman R.S., and Packer M. Clear-lens extraction with multifocal lens implantation. Int Ophthalmol Clin 41 (2001) 113-121
14. Alio J.L., Tavolato M., De la Hoz F., Claramonte P., Rodriguez-Prats J.L., and Galal A. Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses: comparative clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 2494-2503
15. Jacobi F.K., Kammann J., Jacobi K.W., Grosskopf U., and Walden K. Bilateral implantation of asymmetrical diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Arch Ophthalmol 117 (1999) 17-23
16. Claoue C. Functional vision after cataract removal with multifocal and accommodating intraocular lens implantation: prospective comparative evaluation of Array multifocal and 1CU accommodating lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 2088-2091
17. Walkow L., and Klemen U.M. Patient satisfaction after implantation of diffractive designed multifocal intraocular lenses in dependence on objective parameters. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239 (2001) 683-687
18. Alio J.L., and Mulet M.E. Presbyopia correction with an anterior chamber phakic multifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 112 (2005) 1368-1374
19. Steinberg E.P., Tielsch J.M., Schein O.D., Javitt J.C., Sharkey P., Cassard S.D., et al. The VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 112 (1994) 630-638
20. Nijkamp M.D., Dolders M.G., de Brabander J., van den Borne B., Hendrikse F., and Nuijts R.M. Effectiveness of multifocal intraocular lenses to correct presbyopia after cataract surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 1832-1839
21. Mangione C.M., Phillips R.S., Seddon J.M., Lawrence M.G., Cook E.F., Dailey R., et al. Development of the 'Activities of Daily Vision Scale'. A measure of visual functional status. Med Care 30 (1992) 1111-1126
22. Pesudovs K., Garamendi E., and Elliott D.B. The quality of life impact of refractive correction (QIRC) questionnaire: development and validation. Optom Vis Sci 81 (2004) 769-777
23. de Boer M.R., Moll A.C., de Vet H.C., Terwee C.B., Volker-Dieben H.J., and van Rens G.H. Psychometric properties of vision-related quality of life questionnaires: a systematic review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 24 (2004) 257-273
24. Massof R.W., and Rubin G.S. Visual function assessment questionnaires. Surv Ophthalmol 45 (2001) 531-548
25. Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 140 (1932) 1-55
26. Nagata C., Ido M., Shimizu H., Misao A., and Matsuura H. Choice of response scale for health measurement: comparison of 4,5 and 7-point scales and visual analog scale. J Epidemiol 6 (1996) 192-197
27. Massof R.W. A systems model for low vision rehabilitation. II. Measurement of vision disabilities. Optom Vis Sci 75 (1998) 349-373
28. Massof R.W., and Fletcher D.C. Evaluation of the NEI visual functioning questionnaire as an interval measure of visual ability in low vision. Vis Res 41 (2001) 397-413
29. Massof R.W. The measurement of vision disability. Optom Vis Sci 79 (2002) 516-552
30. McHorney C.A., and Monahan P.O. Postscript: applications of Rasch analysis in health care. Med Care 42 (2004) I73-I78
31. Hays R.D., Morales L.S., and Reise S.P. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care 38 (2000) II28-II42
32. Lord F.M., and Novick M.R. Statistical theories of mental test scores (1968), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA
33. Prieto L., Alonso J., and Lamarca R. Classical test theory versus Rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1 (2003) 27-39
34. Wilson M., Allen D.D., and Li J.C. Improving measurement in behavioral sciences using item response models: comparison with the classical test theory approach. Health Educ Res (2006)
35. Garamendi E., Pesudovs K., Stevens M.J., and Elliott D.B. The refractive status and vision profile: evaluation of psychometric properties and comparison of Rasch and summated Likert-scaling. Vis Res 46 (2006) 1375-1383
36. Pesudovs K., Garamendi E., Keeves J.P., and Elliott D.B. The activities of daily vision scale for cataract surgery outcomes: re-evaluating validity with Rasch analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 (2003) 2892-2899
37. Howard E.P. Applying the Rasch Model to test administration. J Nurs Educ 24 (1985) 340-343
38. Smith R.M., and Suh K.K. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates. J Appl Meas 4 (2003) 153-163
39. Karabatsos G. A critique of Rasch residual fit statistics. J Appl Meas 1 (2000) 152-176
40. Smith R.M., Schumacker R.E., and Bush M.J. Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model. J Outcome Meas 2 (1998) 66-78
41. Wright B.D., and Linacre J.M. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas Trans 8 (1994) 370
42. Stelmack J., Szlyk J.P., Stelmack T., Babcock-Parziale J., Demers-Turco P., Williams R.T., et al. Use of Rasch person-item map in exploratory data analysis: a clinical perspective. J Rehabil Res Dev 41 (2004) 233-241
43. Wright B.D. Reliability and separation. Rasch Meas Trans 9 (1996) 472
44. Linacre J.M. WINSTEPS Rasch measurement computer program (2006), Winsteps.com, Chicago
45. Andrich D. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 43 (1978) 561-573
46. Linacre J.M. A user's guide to WINSTEPS Ministep: Rasch-model computer programs (2006), Winsteps.com, Chicago
47. Nunnally J.C., and Bernstein I.H. Psychometric theory (1994), McGraw-Hill Inc, New York
48. Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16 (1951) 297-334
49. Cortina J.M. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol 78 (1993) 98-104
50. Deyo R.A., Diehr P., and Patrick D.L. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials 12 (1991) 142S-158S
51. Kramer M.S., and Feinstein A.R. Clinical biostatistics. LIV. The biostatistics of concordance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 29 (1981) 111-123
52. Shrout P.E., and Fleiss J.L. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86 (1979) 420-428
53. Foster S.L., and Cone J.D. Validity issues in clinical assessment. Psychol Assess 7 (1995) 248-260
54. Streiner D.L., and Norman G.R. Health measurement scales: a guide to their development and use (1995), Oxford University Press Inc, Oxford
55. Mansfield J.S., Ahn S.J., Legge G.E., and Luebker A. A new reading-acuity chart for normal and low vision. Ophthalmic Visual Opt/Noninvasive Assess Visual Syst Techn Digest (Opt Soc Am) 3 (1993) 232-235
56. Rumney N. MnRead: a new LV reading chart. Optometry Today 38 (1998) 50-52
57. Massof R.W., and Emmel T.C. Criterion-free parameter-free distribution-independent index of diagnostic test performance. Appl Opt 26 (1987) 1395-1408
58. Totten V.Y., Panacek E.A., and Price D. Basics of research (Part 14). Survey research methodology: designing the survey instrument. Air Med J 18 (1999) 26-34
59. Kind P. The design and construction of quality of life measures, in centre for health economics: discussion paper 43 (1988), University of York, York p. 1-33
60. Fallowfield L. The quality of life: the missing measurement in health care (1990), Souvenir Press (Educational & Academic) Ltd, London
61. Marx R.G., Menezes A., Horovitz L., Jones E.C., and Warren R.F. A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol 56 (2003) 730-735
62. Wolffsohn J.S., Cochrane A.L., and Watt N.A. Implementation methods for vision related quality of life questionnaires. Br J Ophthalmol 84 (2000) 1035-1040
63. Mangione C.M., Lee P.P., Pitts J., Gutierrez P., Berry S., and Hays R.D. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). NEI-VFQ Field Test Investigators. Arch Ophthalmol 116 (1998) 1496-1504
64. Brenner M.H., Curbow B., Javitt J.C., Legro M.W., and Sommer A. Vision change and quality of life in the elderly. Response to cataract surgery and treatment of other chronic ocular conditions. Arch Ophthalmol 111 (1993) 680-685
65. Hays R.D., Mangione C.M., Ellwein L., Lindblad A.S., Spritzer K.L., and McDonnell P.J. Psychometric properties of the national eye institute-refractive error quality of life instrument. Ophthalmology 110 (2003) 2292-2301
66. Mallinson T., Stelmack J., and Velozo C. A comparison of the separation ratio and coefficient alpha in the creation of minimum item sets. Med Care 42 (2004) I17-I24