Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses

Ophthalmology

Volumn 111, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 318-324

  Küchle, Michael ^a   Seitz, Berthold ^a   Langenbucher, Achim ^a   Gusek Schneider, Gabriele C ^a   Martus, Peter ^b   Nguyen, Nhung X ^a   Hafner, A ^c   Huber, S ^c   Riedel, T ^c   Viestenz, A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^b FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; CYCLOPENTOLATE; EYE DROPS; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENS IMPLANT; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; RETINOSCOPY; VISION TEST; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 10744229344     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.05.033     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Weale R. Presbyopia toward the end of the 20th century. Surv Ophthalmol. 34:1989;15-30.
2. Mathews S. Scleral expansion surgery does not restore accommodation in human presbyopia. Ophthalmology. 106:1999;873-877.
3. Elander R. Scleral expansion surgery does not restore accommodation in human presbyopia. J Refract Surg. 15:1999;604.
4. Vinciguerra P., Nizzola G.M., Bailo G., et al. Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for presbyopia 24-month follow-up in three eyes . J Refract Surg. 14:1998;31-37.
5. Keates R.H., Martines E., Tennen D.G., Reich C. Small-diameter corneal inlay in presbyopic or pseudophakic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 21:1995;519-521.
6. Allen E.D., Burton R.L., Webber S.K., et al. Comparison of a diffractive bifocal and a monofocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 22:1996;446-451.
7. Steinert R.F., Aker B.L., Trentacost D.J., et al. A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 106:1999;1243-1255.
8. Küchle M, Gusek GC, Langenbucher A, Seitz B. First and preliminary results of a new posterior chamber intraocular lens. Online J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2000. Available at: http://www.onjoph.com/deutsch/artikel/pciol. html. Accessed September 15, 2000.
9. Küchle M., Gusek-Schneider G.C., Langenbucher A., et al. First results of implantation of a new, potentially accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. [in German] Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 218:2001;603-608.
10. Küchle M., Nguyen N.X., Langenbucher A., et al. Implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 18:2002;208-216.
11. Nguyen N.X., Langenbucher A., Huber S., et al. Short-term blood-aqueous barrier breakdown after implantation of the 1CU accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 28:2002;1189-1194.
12. Langenbucher A., Huber S., Nguyen X.N., et al. Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 29:2003;677-685.
13. Kommerell G. Streak retinoscopy optical principles and practical recommendations . [in German] Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 203:1993;10-18.
14. Horton J.C., Jones M.R. Warning on inaccurate Rosenbaum charts for testing near vision. Surv Ophthalmol. 42:1997;169-174.
15. Lindstrom R.L. Food and Drug Administration study update one-year results from 671 patients with the 3M multifocal intraocular lens . Ophthalmology. 100:1993;91-97.
16. Werblin T.P. Discussion of Cumming JS, Slade SG, Chayet A, AT-45 Study Group. Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens results of feasibility and the initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial . Ophthalmology. 108:2001;2010.
17. von Helmholtz H. Über die Akkommodation des Auges. Albrecht von Graefes Arch Ophthalmol. 1:1855;1-89.
18. Rohen J. Akkommodationsapparat. Velhagen K. Der Augenarzt. Bd 1. 1969;51-69 Thieme, Leipzig, Germany.
19. Glasser A., Kaufman P.L. The mechanism of accommodation in primates. Ophthalmology. 106:1999;863-872.
20. Legeais J.M., Werner L., Werner L., et al. Pseudoaccommodation. BioComFold versus a foldable silicone intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 25:1999;262-267.
21. Cumming J.S., Slade S.G., Chayet A. Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens results of feasibility and the initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. AT-45 Study Group Ophthalmology. 108:2001;2005-2009.
22. Huber C. Myopic astigmatism a substitute for accommodation in pseudophakia. Doc Ophthalmol. 52:1981;123-178.
23. Nakazawa M., Ohtsuki K. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses optical analysis . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 25:1984;1458-1460.
24. Trindade F., Oliveira A., Frasson M. Benefit of against-the-rule astigmatism to uncorrected near acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg. 23:1997;82-85.
25. Fukuyama M., Oshika T., Amano S., Yoshitomi F. Relationship between apparent accommodation and corneal multifocality in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology. 106:1999;1178-1181.