Qualitative research in functional vision

International Ophthalmology Clinics

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 17-30

  Vitale, Susan ^a   Schein, Oliver D ^b  

^a NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DISEASE COURSE; EYE SURGERY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REFRACTION ERROR; REVIEW; SELF REPORT; SYMPTOM; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 0037362215     PISSN: 00208167     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004397-200343020-00005     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. National Eye Institute. Vision research. A national plan: 1994-1998. A report of the National Advisory Eye Council. NIH Publication No. 93-3186, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1993
2. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications, Inc, 1991
3. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials 1991;12:142S-158S
4. Patrick DL, Erickson P. Health status and health policy. Quality of life in health care evaluation and resource allocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993
5. Stewart AL, Ware JE Jr. Measuring functioning and well-being. The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992
6. Javitt JC, Kendix M, Tielsch JM, et al. Geographic variation in utilization of cataract surgery. Med Care 1995;33:90-105
7. Steinberg EP, Javitt JC, Sharkey PD, et al. The content and cost of cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:1041-1049
8. Coster DJ. The Montgomery Lecture. Some factors which affect the visual outcome of corneal transplantation. Eye 1991;5:265-278
9. Phillips LJ, Lightholder PA, Hurite FG. Evaluation of 225 consecutive intraocular-lens implants. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1978;55:36-42
10. Murphy SB, Donderi DC. Predicting the success of cataract surgery. J Behav Med 1980;3:1-14
11. Bernth-Petersen P. The effectiveness of cataract surgery. A retrospective study. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1981;59:50-56
12. Bernth-Peter P. Visual functioning in cataract patients. Methods of measuring and results. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1981;59:198-205
13. Bernth-Petersen P. Outcome of cataract surgery: II. Visual functioning in aphakic patients. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1982;60:243-252
14. Bernth-Petersen P. Outcome of cataract surgery: I. A prospective, observational study. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1982;60:235-242
15. Bernth-Petersen P, Sorensen T. Intraocular lenses versus extended-wear contact lenses in aphakic rehabilitation. A controlled clinical study. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1983; 61:382-391
16. Elliott DB, Hurst MA, Weatherill J. Comparing clinical tests of visual function in cataract with the patient's perceived visual disability. Eye 1990;4:712-717
17. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, et al. Development of the 'Activities of Daily Vision Scale.' A measure of visual functional status. Med Care 1992;30:1111-1126
18. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Lawrence MG, et al. Improved visual function and attenuation of declines in health-related quality of life after cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:1419-1425
19. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-483
20. Mangione CM, Orav EJ, Lawrence MG, et al. Prediction of visual function after cataract surgery. A prospectively validated model. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:1305-1311
21. Superstein R, Boyaner D, Overbury O. Functional complaints, visual acuity, spatial contrast sensitivity, and glare disability in preoperative and postoperative cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:575-581
22. Steinberg EP, Tielsch JM, Schein OD, et al. National study of cataract surgery outcomes. Variation in 4-month postoperative outcomes as reflected in multiple outcome measures. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1131-1140
23. Tielsch JM, Steinberg EP, Cassard SD, et al. Preoperative functional expectations and postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:1312-1318
24. Damiano AM, Steinberg EP, Cassard SD, et al. Comparison of generic versus disease-specific measures of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Med Care 1995; 33(suppl):AS120-AS130
25. Cassard SD, Patrick DL, Damiano AM, et al. Reproducibility and responsiveness of the VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataracts. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:1508-1513
26. Steinberg EP, Tielsch JM, Schein OD, et al. The VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:630-638
27. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Kressel S, et al. The Sickness Impact Profile: conceptual and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv 1976; 6:393-415
28. Javitt JC, Wang F, Trentacost DJ, et al. Outcomes of cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: functional status and quality of life. Ophthalmology 1997;104:589-599
29. Javitt J, Brauweiler H-P, Jacobi KW, et al. Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes. Multicenter clinical trial in Germany and Austria. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:1356-1366
30. Lundström M, Roos P, Jensen S, et al. Catquest questionnaire for use in cataract surgery care: description, validity, and reliability. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997;23:1226-1236
31. Lundström M, Stenevi U, Thornburn W. Outcome of cataract surgery considering the preoperative situation: a study of possible predictors of the functional outcome. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:1272-1276
32. Sperduto RD, Seigel D, Roberts J, et al. Prevalence of myopia in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 1983;101:405-407
33. Bourque LB, Cosand BB, Drews C, et al. Reported satisfaction, fluctuation of vision, and glare among patients one year after surgery in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:356-363
34. Bourque LB, Lynn MJ, Waring GO 3rd, et al. Spectacle and contact lens wearing six years after radial keratotomy in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy Study. Ophthalmology 1994;101:421-431
35. Bourque LB, Rubenstein R, Cosand B, et al. Psychosocial characteristics of candidates for the prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy (PERK) study. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:1187-1192
36. Hersh PS, Schwartz-Goldstein BH. Corneal topography of phase III excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Characterization and clinical effects. Summit Photorefractive Keratectomy Topography Study Group. Ophthalmology 1995;102:963-978
37. Hersh PS, Shah SI, Geiger D, et al. Corneal optical irregularity after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. The Summit Photorefractive Keratectomy Topography Study Group. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996;22:197-204
38. Hersh PS, Shah SI, Holladay JT. Corneal asphericity following excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Summit PRK Topography Study Group. Ophthalmol Surg Lasers 1996;27(suppl):S421-S428
39. Schwartz-Goldstein BH, Hersh PS. Corneal topography of phase III excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Optical zone centration analysis. Summit Photorefractive Keratectomy Topography Study Group. Ophthalmology 1995;102:951-962
40. Shah SI, Hersh PS. Photorefractive keratectomy for myopia with a 6-mm beam diameter. J Refract Surg 1996;12:341-346
41. Vitale S, Schein OD, Meinert CL, et al. The Refractive Status and Vision Profile. A questionnaire to measure vision-related quality of life in persons with refractive error. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1529-1539
42. Schein OD, Vitale S, Cassard SD, et al. Patient outcomes of refractive surgery. The refractive status and vision profile. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27(5):665-673
43. Brunette I, Gresset J, Boivin J-F, et al. Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy: 1. Development and validation of a survey questionnaire. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1783-1789
44. Brunette I, Gresset J, Boivin J-F, et al. Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy: 2. Survey of 690 patients. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1790-1796
45. Frost NA, Sparrow JM, Durant JS, et al. Development of a questionnaire for measurement of vision-related quality of life. Ophthalmol Epidemiol 1998;5:185-210
46. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Pitts J, et al. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1496-1504.
47. Mangione CM, Berry SH, Spritzer K, et al. Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:227-233
48. Geerling G, Meyer C, Laqua H. Patient expectations and recollection of information about photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997;23:1311-1316
49. Bass EB, Wills S, Scott IU, et al. Preference values for visual states in patients planning to undergo cataract surgery. Med Decis Making 1997;17:324-330