Optimizing electrode positions and analysis strategies for multifocal VEP recordings by ROC analysis

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1445-1454

  Meigen, Thomas ^a   Krämer, Mathias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Analysis; Electrophysiology; Glaucoma; Signal to noise ratio; VEP

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RECORDING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ADULT; ELECTRODES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTIC STIMULATION; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 34247127423     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.01.026     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Apkarian P.A., Nakayama K., and Tyler C.W. Binocularity in the human visual evoked potential: facilitation, summation and suppression. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 51 (1981) 32-48
2. Baseler H.A., and Sutter E.E. M and P components of the VEP and their visual field distribution. Vision Research 37 (1997) 675-690
3. Baseler H.A., Sutter E.E., Klein S.A., and Carney T. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 90 (1994) 65-81
4. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Multiple significance tests-the Bonferroni method. British Medical Journal 310 (1995) 170
5. Dobie R.A., and Wilson M.J. Objective response detection in the frequency domain. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 88 (1993) 516-524
6. Graham S.L., Klistorner A.I., and Goldberg I. Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials in glaucoma practice. Archives of Ophthalmology 123 (2005) 729-739
7. Graham S.L., Klistorner A.I., Grigg J.R., and Billson F.A. Objective VEP perimetry in glaucoma: asymmetry analysis to identify early deficits. Journal of Glaucoma 9 (2000) 10-19
8. Heravian Shandiz J., Douthwaite W.A., and Jenkins T.C. Effect of attention on the VEP in binocular and monocular conditions. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 12 (1992) 437-442
9. Hoffmann M.B., Straube S., and Bach B. Pattern-onset stimulation boosts central multifocal VEP responses. Journal of Vision 3 (2003) 432-439
10. Hood D.C., and Greenstein V.C. Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 22 (2003) 201-251
11. Hood D.C., Ohri N., Yang E.B., Rodarte C., Zhang X., Fortune B., et al. Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials: a monocular analysis. Documenta Ophthalmologica 109 (2004) 189-199
12. Hood D.C., and Zhang X. Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes. Documenta Ophthalmologica 100 (2000) 115-137
13. Hood D.C., Zhang X., Greenstein V.C., Kangovi S., Odel J.G., Liebmann J.M., et al. An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 41 (2000) 1580-1587
14. Hood D.C., Zhang X., Hong J.E., and Chen C.S. Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording. Documenta Ophthalmologica 104 (2002) 303-320
15. Hood D.C., Zhang X., Rodarte C., Yang E.B., Ohri N., Fortune B., et al. Determining abnormal interocular latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials. Documenta Ophthalmologica 109 (2004) 177-187
16. Hood D.C., Zhang X., and Winn B.J. Detecting glaucomatous damage with multifocal visual evoked potentials: how can a monocular test work?. Journal of Glaucoma 12 (2003) 3-15
17. James A.C. The pattern-pulse multifocal visual evoked potential. Investigative Ophthalmologica and Visual Science 44 (2003) 879-890
18. Klistorner A., and Graham S.L. Objective perimetry in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 107 (2000) 2283-2299
19. Klistorner A.I., and Graham S.L. Multifocal pattern VEP perimetry: analysis of sectoral waveforms. Documenta Ophthalmologica 98 (1999) 183-196
20. Klistorner A.I., and Graham S.L. Electroencephalogram-based scaling of multifocal visual evoked potentials: effect on intersubject amplitude variability. Investigative Ophthalmologica and Visual Science 42 (2001) 2145-2152
21. Klistorner A.I., Graham S.L., Grigg J.R., and Billson F.A. Electrode position and the multi-focal visual-evoked potential: role in objective visual field assessment. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology 26 Suppl. 1 (1998) S91-S94
22. Klistorner A.I., Graham S.L., Grigg J.R., and Billson F.A. Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 39 (1998) 937-950
23. Marmarelis P.Z., and Marmarelis V.Z. Analysis of physiological systems (1978), Plenum Press, New York
24. Odom J.V., Bach M., Barber C., Brigell M., Marmor M.F., Tormene A.P., et al. Visual evoked potentials standard (2004). Documenta Ophthalmologica 108 (2004) 115-123
25. Sutter E. The fast M-transform: fast computation of cross-correlations with binary m-sequences. SIAM Journal of Computing 20 (1991) 686-694
26. Sutter E. The interpretation of multifocal binary kernels. Documenta Ophthalmologica 100 (2000) 49-75
27. Sutter E.E., and Tran D. The field topography of ERG components in man-I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Research 32 (1992) 433-446
28. Swets J.A. Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: implications for theory and measurement of performance. Psychology Bulletin 99 (1986) 181-198
29. Swets J.A. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240 (1988) 1285-1293
30. Zhang X., Hood D.C., Chen C.S., and Hong J.E. A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: an objective definition for poor records. Documenta Ophthalmologica 104 (2002) 287-302