Emerging vascular applications of magnetic resonance imaging: A picture is worth more than a thousand words

Vascular

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 366-371

  Fitzgerald, Tamara N ^a   Muto, Akihito ^a   Kudo, Fabio Akimaro ^a   Pimiento, Jose Mario ^a   Constable, Robert Todd ^a   Dardik, Alan ^a,b,c  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VA CONNECTICUT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Emerging technology; Flow; Magnetic resonance imaging; Plaque characteristics; Quantitative analysis

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE; BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD VESSEL; BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECHOGRAPHY; FLOW KINETICS; HEMODYNAMICS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PACEMAKER; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ALGORITHMS; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD VESSELS; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, INTERVENTIONAL; PATIENT SELECTION; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 34147211380     PISSN: 17085381     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/6670.2006.00062     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Holland GA, Barker CF. Peripheral vascular surgery with magnetic resonance angiography as the sole preoperative imaging modality. J Vasc Surg 1994;20:869-71.
2. Nighoghossian N, Derex L, Douek P. The vulnerable carotid artery plaque: current imaging methods and new perspectives. Stroke 2005;36:2764-72.
3. Rapp JH, Saloner D. Current status of carotid imaging by MRA. Cardiovasc Surg 2003;11:445-7.
4. Markl M, Uhl M, Wieben O, et al. High resolution 3T MRI for the assessment of cervical and superficial cranial arteries in giant cell arteritis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:423-7.
5. Clarke SE, Beletsky V, Hammond RR, et al. Validation of automatically classified magnetic resonance images for carotid plaque compositional analysis. Stroke 2006;37:93-7.
6. Coombs BD, Rapp JH, Ursell PC, et al. Structure of plaque at carotid bifurcation high-resolution MRI with histological correlation. Stroke 2001;32:2516-21.
7. Saam T, Ferguson MS, Yarnykh VL, et al. Quantitative evaluation of carotid plaque composition by in vivo MRI. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005;25:234-9.
8. Wasserman BA, Wityk RJ, Trout HH, Virmani R. Low-grade carotid stenosis looking beyond the lumen with MRI. Stroke 2005; 36:2504-13.
9. Troyer A, Saloner D, Pan XM, et al. Major carotid plaque surface irregularities correlate with neurologic symptoms. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:741-7.
10. Takaya N, Yuan C, Chu B, et al. Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI - initial results. Stroke 2006;37:818-23.
11. Zarins CK, Giddens DP, Bharadvaj BK, et al. Carotid bifurcation atherosclerosis. Quantitative correlation of plaque localization with flow velocity profiles and wall shear stress. Circ Res 1983;53:502-14.
12. Kaazempur-Mofrad MR, Isasi AG, Younis HF, et al. Characterization of the atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation using MRI, finite element modeling, and histology. Ann Biomed Eng 2004;32:932-46.
13. U.-King-Im JM, Li ZY, Trivedi RA, et al. Correlation of shear stress with carotid plaque rupture using MRI and finite element analysis. J Neurol 2006;253:379-81.
14. Antiga L, Ene-Iordache B, Remuzzi A. Computational geometry for patient-specific reconstruction and meshing of blood vessels from MR and CT angiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003;22: 674-84.
15. Markl M, Schumacher R, Kuffer J, et al. Rapid vessel prototyping: vascular modeling using 3T magnetic resonance angiography and rapid prototyping technology. MAGMA 2005;18:288-92.
16. Buonocore MH. Visualizing blood flow patterns using streamlines, arrows, and particle paths. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:210-26.
17. Davies PF, Dewey CF, Bussolari SR, et al. Influence of hemodynamic forces on vascular endothelial function. In vitro studies of shear stress and pinocytosis in bovine aortic cells. J Clin Invest 1984;73:1121-9.
18. Dewey CF, Bussolari SR, Gimbrone MA, Davies PF. The dynamic response of vascular endothelial cells to fluid shear stress. J Biomech Eng 1981;103:177-85.
19. Papathanasopoulou P, Zhao S, Kohler U, et al. MRI measurement of time-resolved wall shear stress vectors in a carotid bifurcation model, and comparison with CFD predictions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:153-62.
20. Tyszka JM, Laidlaw DH, Asa JW, Silverman JM. Three-dimensional, time-resolved (4D) relative pressure mapping using magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12: 321-9.
21. Markl M, Draney MT, Hope MD, et al. Time-resolved 3-dimensional velocity mapping in the thoracic aorta. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28:459-68.
22. Markl M, Draney MT, Miller DC, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of aortic flow in healthy volunteers and patients after valve-sparing aortic root replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:456-63.
23. Riehle TJ, Oshinski JN, Brummer ME, et al. Velocity-encoded magnetic resonance image assessment of regional aortic flow in coarctation patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1002-7.
24. Nielsen JC, Powell AJ, Gauvreau K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of coarctation severity. Circulation 2005;111: 622-8.
25. Schoenberg SO, Bock M, Kallinowski F, Just A. Correlation of hemodynamic impact and morphologic degree of renal artery stenosis in a canine model. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11:2190-8.
26. Houston JG, Gandy SJ, Milne W, et al. Spiral laminar flow in the abdominal aorta: a predictor of renal impairment deterioration in patients with renal artery stenosis? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19:1786-91.
27. Jou LD, Wong G, Dispensa B, et al. Correlation between lumenal geometry changes and hemodynamics in fusiform intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2357-63.
28. Acevedo-Bolton G, Jou L, Dispensa BP, et al. Estimating the hemodynamic impact of interventional treatments of aneurysms: numerical simulation with experimental validation: technical case report. Neurosurgery 2006;59:429-30.
29. Steele BN, Wan J, Ku JP, et al. In vivo validation of a one-dimensional finite-element method for predicting blood flow in cardiovascular bypass grafts. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003;50:649-56.
30. VanLaar PJ, VanDerGrond J, Moll FL, et al. Hemodynamic effect of carotid stenting and carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44:73-8.
31. Farrar CT, Wedeen VJ, Ackerman JL. Cylindrical meanderline radiofrequency coil for intravascular magnetic resonance studies of atherosclerotic plaque. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:226-30.
32. Hillenbrand CM, Jesberger JA, Wong EY, et al. Toward rapid high resolution in vivo intravascular MRI: evaluation of vessel wall conspicuity in a porcine model using multiple imaging protocols. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;23:135-44.
33. Wilson GJ, Hoogeveen RM, Willinek WA, et al. Parallel imaging in MR angiography. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:169-85.
34. Fenchel M, Nael K, Deshpande VS, et al. Renal magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla using a 32-element phased-array coil system and parallel imaging in 2 directions. Invest Radiol 2006;41: 697-703.
35. Ersoy H, Zhang H, Prince MR. Peripheral MR angiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Res 2006;8:517-28.
36. Madhuranthakam AJ, Hu HH, Kruger DG, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vasculature with a continuously moving table and modified elliptical centric acquisition. Radiology 2006;240:222-9.
37. Kruger DG, Riederer SJ, Polzin JA, et al. Dual-velocity continuously moving table acquisition for contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography. Magn Reson Med 2005;53: 110-7.