Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vasculature with a continuously moving table and modified elliptical centric acquisition

Radiology

Volumn 240, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 222-229

  Madhuranthakam, Ananth J ^a   Hu, Houchun H ^a   Kruger, David G ^a   Glockner, James F ^a   Riederer, Stephen J ^a  

^a Mayo Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MODIFIED ELLIPTICAL CENTRIC ACQUISITION; MOVEMENT THERAPY; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PERIPHERAL CIRCULATION; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SIGNAL DETECTION; SPATIAL RESOLUTION;

AGED; ARTERIES; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SUPINE POSITION;

EID: 33745135050     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2401050772     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206:683-692.
2. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 1999;211:59-67.
3. Foo TK, Ho VB, Hood MN, Marcos HB, Hess SL, Choyke PL. High-spatial-resolution multistation MR imaging of lower-extremity peripheral vasculature with segmented volume acquisition: feasibility study. Radiology 2001;219:835-841.
4. Goyen M, Quick HH, Debatin JF, et al. Whole-body three-dimensional MR angiography with a rolling table platform: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2002;224:270-277.
5. Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WR, Hoogeveen RM. Utilizing SENSE to achieve lower station submillimeter isotropic resolution and minimal venous enhancement in peripheral MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:484-491.
6. Kruger DG, Riederer SJ, Grimm RC, Rossman PJ. Continuously moving table data acquisition method for long FOV contrast-enhanced MRA and whole-body MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47:224-231.
7. Peters DC, Korosec FR, Grist TM, et al. Undersampled projection reconstruction applied to MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 2000;43: 91-101.
8. Vigen KK, Peters DC, Grist TM, Block WF, Mistretta CA. Undersampled projection-reconstruction imaging for time-resolved contrast-enhanced imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000;43: 170-176.
9. Barger AV, Block WF, Toropov Y, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced imaging with isotropic resolution and broad coverage using an undersampled 3D projection trajectory. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:297-305.
10. Fain SB, Browning FJ, Polzin JA, et al. Floating table isotropic projection (FLIPR) acquisition: a time-resolved 3D method for extended field-of-view MRI during continuous table motion. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:1093-1102.
11. van den Brink JS, Watanabe Y, Kuhl CK, et al. Implications of SENSE MR in routine clinical practice. Eur J Radiol 2003;46:3-27.
12. Hu HH, Madhuranthakam AJ, Kruger DG, Glockner JF, Riederer SJ. Continuously moving table MRI with SENSE: application in peripheral contrast enhanced MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 2005;54;1025-1031.
13. Wilson GJ, Hoogeveen RM, Willinek WA, Muthupillai R, Maki JH. Parallel imaging in MR angiography. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 15:169-185.
14. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ. Performance of an elliptical centric view order for signal enhancement and motion artifact suppression in breath-hold three-dimensional gradient echo imaging. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:793-802.
15. Madhuranthakam AJ, Hu HH, Barger AV, Haider CR, Kruger DG, Glockner JF, Huston J, Riederer SJ. Undersampled elliptical centric view-order for improved resolution in contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Magn Reson Imaging 2006;55:50-58.
16. Madhuranthakam AJ, Kruger DG, Riederer SJ, Glockner JF, Hu HH. Time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MRA of an extended FOV using continuous fable motion. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:568-576.
17. Noll DC, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. Homodyne detection in magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1991;10:154-163.
18. Block WF, Peters DC, Vigen KK. Homodyne reconstruction for projection reconstruction trajectories [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1999; 659.
19. Perman WH, Heiberg EV, Herrmann VM. Half-Fourier, three-dimensional technique for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of both breasts and axillae: initial characterization of breast lesions. Radiology 1996;200:263-269.
20. Polzin JA, Kruger DG, Gurr DH, Brittain JH, Riederer SJ. Correction for gradient nonlinearity in continuously moving table MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:181-187.
21. Zhang HL, Ho BY, Chao M, et al. Decreased venous contamination on 3D gadolinium-enhanced bolus chase peripheral MR angiography using thigh compression. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:1041-1047.
22. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-962.
23. Kruger DG, Riederer SJ, Polzin JA, Madhuranthakam AJ, Hu HH, Glockner JF. Dual-velocity continuously moving table acquisition for contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:110-117.